Re: [PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal

Lewis, please be patient. Edward and I are working on getting ICLAs signed, etc., and that process shouldn't block entry into the incubator. >From an IP perspective, the age of the original codebase has no relevance. I will call a vote soon, but not until I'm confident that the IPMC has had

Re: [PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal

Hi Ed, If you were able to track down the GoogleCode authors and update this thread then that would be good. @John, bq. > I can't speak with 100% certainty, but it sounds like an SGA would be > expected prior to importing into an ASF repo. >From whom? The old GoogleCode community who have not

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Apex Core Release 3.2.1-incubating (RC1)

The vote passes with 3, +1 binding votes from IPMC members and no -1s: Justin Mclean Alan Gates John D. Ament Thanks for voting, we will proceed with the release activities. Thank you, Vlad On 4/20/16 13:45, John D. Ament wrote: +1 on the release. On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 7:42 PM Vlad Rozov

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M2

Thanks for the feedback Justin! > On Apr 19, 2016, at 7:14 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > +1 binding > > I checked: > - incubating in name > - signatures correct > - DISCLAIMER exits > - source LICENSE has some minor issues (see below) > - source NOICE is good

Re: [VOTE] Apache Apex Core Release 3.2.1-incubating (RC1)

+1 on the release. On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 7:42 PM Vlad Rozov wrote: > Please vote on the following Apache Apex Core 3.2.1-incubating release > candidate. > > The Apache Apex PPMC has voted to release this candidate. > > The community vote passed with 3 binding votes

Re: [VOTE] Apache Apex Core Release 3.2.1-incubating (RC1)

Dear IPMC members, One more nod for this release please. Thanks, Thomas On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Vlad Rozov wrote: > Hi IPMC members, > > With 2 +1 binding votes from Justin and Alan, we need one more vote to > proceed with the release. May I ask for one more

[RESULT][VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.0-incubating Release

The vote for releasing Apache TinkerPop 3.2.0-incubating passed with 3 binding +1s, 0 non-binding +1s, and no 0 or -1. Binding +1s: Daniel Gruno John Ament Justin Mclean Thanks again to those who were able to take the time to vote. On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Daniel Gruno

[RESULT][VOTE] TinkerPop 3.1.2-incubating Release

The vote for releasing Apache TinkerPop 3.1.2-incubating passed with 3 binding +1s, 0 non-binding +1s, and no 0 or -1. Binding +1s: Daniel Gruno John Ament Justin Mclean Justin, glad to see you were happy with LICENSE/NOTICE on this pass. :) John, the project is TinkerPop but the binary

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.1.2-incubating Release

+1 (binding) With regards, Daniel. On 04/14/2016 08:46 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 (binding) > > I checked: > - incubating in name > - signatures good > - DISCLAIMER(s) exists > - source LICENSE and NOTICE good > - binary LICENSEs and NOTICEs good > - no unexpected binaries in source

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.0-incubating Release

+1 from me as well. With regards, Daniel. On 04/14/2016 09:15 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 (binding) > > I checked: > - incubating in name > - signatures good > - DISCLAIMER(s) exists > - source and binary LICENSE/NOTICE identical to 3.1.2 release (and no new > copyrights) so all

Re: [VOTE] Retire Concerted

+1 (binding) Sad, but something quite expected. So a lesson to learn for future similar cases. On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:32 AM, Julian Hyde wrote: > Following a discussion[1], the Concerted community has voted to retire the > project from incubation[2]. Per the retirement