Re: Worked LICENSE and NOTICE example

Justin, Thank you for putting this up. This is super helpful. - Henry On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 7:16 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > At the last ApacheCon I was discussing with Marvin about some of the > issues around assembling license and notice files. One of the

Re: Worked LICENSE and NOTICE example

HI, > This gets tricky because something in category B won't be in the > source release, and thus should not be in the standard LICENSE/NOTICE. Correct and that why it's a good example to make - may be a few other examples first to cover other issues (propagation of NOTICE files for instance

Re: Worked LICENSE and NOTICE example

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:49 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: Justin, thank you so much for pushing forward with this! > I could make an example with Category B licenses (weak copy left) > as I’ve not covered that yet. This gets tricky because something in category B won't

Re: Worked LICENSE and NOTICE example

+1 This is awesome, Justin. Thanks for making the time to put this together. Justin Mclean wrote: Hi, At the last ApacheCon I was discussing with Marvin about some of the issues around assembling license and notice files. One of the ideas we come up with was to have some worked examples. So

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.25 (incubating)

+1 On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 1:47 PM wrote: > Hi all, > > The Apache FreeMarker community has voted on and approved a proposal > to release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.25-incubating. > > PPMC Vote Call: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.25 (incubating)

+1 (Binding) On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 7:47 PM, wrote: > Hi all, > > The Apache FreeMarker community has voted on and approved a proposal > to release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.25-incubating. > > PPMC Vote Call: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.25 (incubating)

+1 (not binding) Jacques Le 22/06/2016 à 19:47, ddek...@apache.org a écrit : Hi all, The Apache FreeMarker community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.25-incubating. PPMC Vote Call:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Command-line Tool 3.1.0-incubating RC3

Hi, we have +2 already for the below Taverna release candidate (Thanks Justin and Sergio!) - do we have any other IPMC volunteers..? Thanks! On 17 June 2016 at 14:26, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > The Taverna PPMC has successfully voted for the source release of > > Apache

Re: Worked LICENSE and NOTICE example

Hi, On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > You can’t have a dependancy (other than optional) on or include non > permissive licenses like LGPL. Even if it’s an optional dependancy nothing > would go in NOTICE as it’s not bundled. > Right, non-bundled

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.25 (incubating)

Re-casting my vote here for easy reference: +1 (binding) Jacopo Cappellato On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 7:47 PM, wrote: > Hi all, > > The Apache FreeMarker community has voted on and approved a proposal > to release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.25-incubating. > > PPMC Vote Call: > >

Re: Worked LICENSE and NOTICE example

Hi, > Great idea, Justin! Thanks! I’m considering making several examples, perhaps a few other people can help me out? > What about including an example in the NOTICE about the inclusion of a > non-permissive 3rd party license (e.g., LGPL)? You can’t have a dependancy (other than optional) on

Re: Worked LICENSE and NOTICE example

Great idea, Justin! What about including an example in the NOTICE about the inclusion of a non-permissive 3rd party license (e.g., LGPL)? I can make a PR in case you find it relevant. On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 2:16 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > At the last

Re: Worked LICENSE and NOTICE example

Hi Justin, This is the best guide to understand the topic. Thank you. Regards Ajay Yadava On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi Justin, > > great, really helpful ! > > Regards > JB > > > On 06/23/2016 02:16 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>