[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Slider (incubating) release 0.91.0-incubating rc1

This vote passes 4 binding +1's. Thanks again John and Justin! I'll go ahead and promote the artifacts. SLIDER-1149 was filed to dbl-check L in the jars before the next release. Josh Elser wrote: Hi folks, This is a call for a vote on the Apache Slider (incubating) release

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Atlas version 0.7-incubating

Thanks Justin for verifying We have used sha512 already. We need to remove glyphicons font. We will also fix the LICENSE and NOTICE and get back. Thanks! Regards, Shwetha On 28/06/16, 10:40 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >-1 (binding) until font license

July 2016 - Incubator Report Timeline

July 2016 Incubator report timeline: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/July2016 Wed July 06 -- Podling reports due by end of day Sun July 10 -- Shepherd reviews due by end of day Sun July 10 -- Summary due by end of day Tue July 12 -- Mentor signoff due by end of day Wed

Re: [VOTE] $podling.apache.org is the same as $podling.incubator.apache.org

I'm eyeing some changes to http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html as well, so I don't mind picking this up. The issue originally came up as we found that many newly created podlings had working websites as $podling.apache.org in addition to $podling.i.a.o. Marvin had sent out an audit of

Re: [VOTE] $podling.apache.org is the same as $podling.incubator.apache.org

Hi, +1 but only if poddlings follow branding guidelines [1] (i.e. include disclaimer on website) I's also suggest that the inclusion of the incubator logo be changed to a MUST rather than a SHOULD as the URL may no longer include “incubator”. The page [1] may require a couple of minor edit as

Re: [VOTE] $podling.apache.org is the same as $podling.incubator.apache.org

+1 On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 7:58 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > All, > > Its been discussed a few times, and I'd like to provide clear feedback to > the infra team on how to implement going forward. > > Typically, the addresses $podling.apache.org and $ >

Re: [VOTE] $podling.apache.org is the same as $podling.incubator.apache.org

+1 Looking forward to this one :) On Tuesday, June 28, 2016, John D. Ament wrote: > All, > > Its been discussed a few times, and I'd like to provide clear feedback to > the infra team on how to implement going forward. > > Typically, the addresses $podling.apache.org and

Re: [VOTE] $podling.apache.org is the same as $podling.incubator.apache.org

+1 Niall On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 3:28 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > All, > > Its been discussed a few times, and I'd like to provide clear feedback to > the infra team on how to implement going forward. > > Typically, the addresses $podling.apache.org and $ >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

Hi, And also: - no need to mention point “d” or list Apache 2.0 licensed software. [1] Justin 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

Hi, > which as I understand it is the preferred way to include MIT-style licenses > in LICENSE.txt. That is the case. However other MIT license software include the LICENSE text are included in full (e.g. UTF-8 Library, epoch, jQuery). In all cases they are bundled with the source so I don’t

Re: [VOTE] $podling.apache.org is the same as $podling.incubator.apache.org

+1 It’s easy to change content (e.g. the incubation disclaimer at the top of the home page and in files that are part of the release) but it’s difficult to change URLs. Remember that projects are ongoing operations, before and after graduation, and they are trying to reduce friction in their

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 binding > > But would be good clarify licenses of patches and fix up the slightly > confusing section in LICENSE. > > Thanks for your thorough check as always. Notes below: > I checked: > - incubating

Re: [VOTE] $podling.apache.org is the same as $podling.incubator.apache.org

+1 (binding) Having to switch domain names during graduation is a pain for users, SEO, printed t-shirts, etc. Especially after many podlings arrive from outside the ASF and already have to switch once when entering incubation, adding the second switch is aggravating. -Todd On Tue, Jun 28, 2016

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < > chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > >> Hi Todd, >> >> If the release managers log in to id.apache.org and put their >> keys in their profile the kudu.asc

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > Hi Todd, > > If the release managers log in to id.apache.org and put their > keys in their profile the kudu.asc will get generated automatically. > Hrm, when I log in, it shows: OpenPGP Public

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

Hi Todd, If the release managers log in to id.apache.org and put their keys in their profile the kudu.asc will get generated automatically. I grabbed the KEYS file and was able to verify the release, so +1 from me! Cheers, Chris LMC-053601:apache-kudu-0.9.1-RC1 mattmann$ curl -O

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > Hi All, > > minor nit first: > > there are no KEYS present in: > > > > And, the Git WP repo doesn’t have a KEYS file. > > Can someone point me to

Re: [VOTE] $podling.apache.org is the same as $podling.incubator.apache.org

+1 (non-binding) On 28 Jun 2016 3:29 p.m., "John D. Ament" wrote: > All, > > Its been discussed a few times, and I'd like to provide clear feedback to > the infra team on how to implement going forward. > > Typically, the addresses $podling.apache.org and $ >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

Hi All, minor nit first: there are no KEYS present in: And, the Git WP repo doesn’t have a KEYS file. Can someone point me to the KEYS file? Cheers, Chris P.S. I couldn’t find my old email with the release +1, so I am redo’ing my VOTE.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote: > +1 (binding) > > So far I've checked: signatures and digests, source releases file layouts, > matched git tags and commit ids, incubator suffix and disclaimer, NOTICE > and LICENSE files, license headers, build from

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

+1 (binding) So far I've checked: signatures and digests, source releases file layouts, matched git tags and commit ids, incubator suffix and disclaimer, NOTICE and LICENSE files, license headers, build from sources (CMake 3.5.1, GCC 5.3.1, Debian amd64). The thirdparty/patches folder looks a

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

+1 On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 11:10 AM Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hi, > > The PPMC vote to release Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1 passed and > I'm now submitting this to the IPMC. > > Vote thread: > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

+1 -Jake On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hi, > > The PPMC vote to release Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1 passed and > I'm now submitting this to the IPMC. > > Vote thread: > >

Re: [VOTE] $podling.apache.org is the same as $podling.incubator.apache.org

+1 to implementing this in the future. -0 for retroactive implementation. On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Flavio Junqueira wrote: > +1 > >> On 28 Jun 2016, at 15:28, John D. Ament wrote: >> >> All, >> >> Its been discussed a few times, and I'd like to

Re: [VOTE] $podling.apache.org is the same as $podling.incubator.apache.org

+1 > On 28 Jun 2016, at 15:28, John D. Ament wrote: > > All, > > Its been discussed a few times, and I'd like to provide clear feedback to > the infra team on how to implement going forward. > > Typically, the addresses $podling.apache.org and $ >

[VOTE] $podling.apache.org is the same as $podling.incubator.apache.org

All, Its been discussed a few times, and I'd like to provide clear feedback to the infra team on how to implement going forward. Typically, the addresses $podling.apache.org and $ podling.incubator.apache.org work, and have worked for a while. This is a call to vote on whether the IPMC agrees

Re: *.incubator.apache.org and lists.apache.org?

On 06/28/2016 04:19 PM, John D. Ament wrote: On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:17 AM Daniel Gruno wrote: Let's keep the two things separate: There's Pony Mail, and then there's lists.apache.org which is a specific installation of it. In the specific agreement we have about

Re: *.incubator.apache.org and lists.apache.org?

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:17 AM Daniel Gruno wrote: > Let's keep the two things separate: There's Pony Mail, and then there's > lists.apache.org which is a specific installation of it. > > In the specific agreement we have about lists.apache.org, we wanted the >

Projects using GitHub issues

All, I started a discussion on legal discuss, as I was told VP Legal approved using GitHub issues. I have no specific concerns, other than ensuring that permissions are propagated.

Re: *.incubator.apache.org and lists.apache.org?

Let's keep the two things separate: There's Pony Mail, and then there's lists.apache.org which is a specific installation of it. In the specific agreement we have about lists.apache.org, we wanted the '.incubator' part of the mailing list IDs stripped, so we wouldn't have to fix that every

*.incubator.apache.org and lists.apache.org?

Hi, I'm helping the new Juneau podling, and some confusion came because https://lists.apache.org/list.html?d...@juneau.apache.org claims the address is d...@juneau.apache.org and lists dev-subscr...@juneau.apache.org as it's "Subscribe" address. Reply-To on the list is however

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

Hi, +1 binding But would be good clarify licenses of patches and fix up the slightly confusing section in LICENSE. I checked: - incubating in name - signature and hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - NOTICE is good - LICENSE I think is missing a boost [1] and again I think the end section is