Re: [VOTE] Releasing Apache Metron 0.2.0BETA-RC2

Ok, fair points. The discussion was within the project's mailing list here rather than a discussion with legal. As such, we're going to do the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Sirona 0.4-incubating

Ah ok, I see it on Pony Mail: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ec6f2b78221d6287d0db3cc8a07fdec72161a54b7e032961f664ec70@%3Cdev.sirona.apache.org%3E Though for some reason this is marked as a private list. John On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 4:21 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Sirona 0.4-incubating

@John: JL just voted too - why i closed the vote on dev@. Seems mail-archives didn't eat it yet Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Wordpress Blog | Github

Re: [VOTE] Apache Sirona 0.4-incubating

Romain, I'm failing to see the vote result on dev@sirona. I see votes from you and Olivier. John On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 4:07 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys, > > > sirona vote passed on dev@ so here is the general vote (the dev thread was >

[VOTE] Apache Sirona 0.4-incubating

Hi guys, sirona vote passed on dev@ so here is the general vote (the dev thread was http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/sirona-dev/201607.mbox/browser). This release is mainly about getting fixes out + some enhancements on the path tracking + few new features to integrate with existing

Re: [VOTE] Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) also. With regards, Daniel. On 07/09/2016 10:08 AM, Nick Kew wrote: > On Fri, 2016-07-08 at 18:16 -0600, Jan van Doorn wrote: > >> I don't think the association with ATS would hold us back, but I do think it >> could give prospective users of Traffic Control the impression that it

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Apache Metron 0.2.0BETA-RC2

Hi, > . > If you think it's clearer, we can pull it into its own file and mention it > in the LICENSE for next release Sounds fine to me. > Regarding the effective_tld_names.dat, we had this discussion last release > and

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Apache Metron 0.2.0BETA-RC2

Thanks for the careful attention, Justin. Regarding the sample data for the StixExtractorTest.java, that came from here and I considered it to be 3-clause BSD licensed due to

[DRAFT] Incubator PMC report for July 2016

All, Below is the current draft of the board report. There's still a large number of podlings not signed off, mentors don't forget to sign off or review with the podling changes required to get a sign off. John Incubator PMC report for July 2016 The Apache Incubator is the entry path into

Re: Warning from d...@juneau.incubator.apache.org

On Sun, 2016-07-10 at 20:52 -0700, Danese Cooper wrote: > I get these in spates. As James says they don't seem to cause real trouble so > I have learned to ignore them. They only happen between Apache mail server > and Gmail. It's not just gmail, nor just any-mail. It was those messages that