Hi general team,
Could you please give your judgement on this vote? Thanks.
Michael
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Michael Wu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is the incubator release of Apache Eagle, version 0.4.0-incubating.
> Highlighted changes in this release are as the following:
> * JBDC
Hi John
The vote period has ended and I'm indicating that we will reissue a new
candidate release package in lieu of the down votes.Do I need to explicitly say
'cancel' the vote?
ThanksKam
On Sunday, July 17, 2016 7:36 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
Did you mean to cancel this vote?
On Jul
Did you mean to cancel this vote?
On Jul 17, 2016 22:29, "Kam Kasravi" wrote:
> The results are in and voting is now closed.
>
> [2] +1 Release this package as gearpump-0.8.1
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré (binding)
> Andrew Purtell (binding)
>
> [2] -1 Do not release this package
> Justin Mclean (bindin
The results are in and voting is now closed.
[2] +1 Release this package as gearpump-0.8.1
Jean-Baptiste Onofré (binding)
Andrew Purtell (binding)
[2] -1 Do not release this package
Justin Mclean (binding) missing DISCLAIMER and LICENSE problems
John D. Ament (binding) missing DISCLAIMER
We will
Daniel Gruno wrote:
On 07/17/2016 06:03 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
+1 (binding)
Yay!
* Verified SHA1 and sig
* DISCLAIMER present
* LICENSE and NOTICE look good after glance through source release
* Didn't find anything to explicitly build or any automated tests to run
(maybe I missed them?)
Pierre,
Personally, I'd prefer to remove attributes like this from the clutch all
together. Clutch is hard to read as it stands. Many of its attributes are
based on the older methodology, and probably needs some clean up now that
git is prevalent and podlings even get their own repos (used to be
On Thu, 14 Jul 2016, Gangumalla, Uma wrote:
Can some one grant write access to my Wiki account? UserName: Uma
Maheswara Rao G
Sorry for the delay, karma now granted
Nick
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator
+1
There's a few files that need headers on them, in addition to what Josh
brought up.
- aaa_examples/README.md
- configs/*
- tools/* uses inconsistent headers
John
On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 5:08 AM Daniel Gruno wrote:
> Hello IPMC and lurkers,
> This is a vote to release Apache Pony Mail (Incu
On 07/17/2016 06:03 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
> +1 (binding)
Yay!
>
> * Verified SHA1 and sig
> * DISCLAIMER present
> * LICENSE and NOTICE look good after glance through source release
> * Didn't find anything to explicitly build or any automated tests to run
> (maybe I missed them?)
Pony Mail is
+1 (binding)
* Verified SHA1 and sig
* DISCLAIMER present
* LICENSE and NOTICE look good after glance through source release
* Didn't find anything to explicitly build or any automated tests to run
(maybe I missed them?)
* Verified commit ID in repo
Things to fix for your next release (I don't
I should note that this vote will run for 72 hours.
Also, it currently carries one binding IPMC vote (me).
With regards,
Daniel.
On 07/17/2016 11:08 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> Hello IPMC and lurkers,
> This is a vote to release Apache Pony Mail (Incubating) 0.9.RC2 as 0.9.
>
> Podling vote thread
Hello IPMC and lurkers,
This is a vote to release Apache Pony Mail (Incubating) 0.9.RC2 as 0.9.
Podling vote thread is at:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9fd77b14753bbde462bea06fc2e1c03d5cf5a89cea2fabd6751d805a@%3Cdev.ponymail.apache.org%3E
The release artefact can be found at:
https://dist
12 matches
Mail list logo
