Re: Dual-licensed logo PNG (CC-BY 3.0, LGPL 3.0)?

Hi, I would recommend that we only license that under CC-SA, but you might want to point out that the media files are also available under LGPL3. The downstream user can re-apply (or swap with) the LGPL3 if they want to, as those media files are unmodified and we lay no additional claims.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pirk 0.1.0-incubating Release

+1 binding 1. License, Disclaimer, Notice look good 2. Compiled source and all tests pass 3. Verified MD5 , SHA1 sigs of artifacts 4. RAT checks pass On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 binding > > I checked: > - name included incubating

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pirk 0.1.0-incubating Release

Hi, > In terms of the README mentioning bundled cryptogrphic code, it says that > "Apache Pirk implements cryptographic software..." -- the Paillier class is > one such implementation. I don’t think anything is required just that it could be made a bit clearer. Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pirk 0.1.0-incubating Release

Hi Justin, The Paillier implementation was part of the original software grant for Apache Pirk from the National Security Agency. In terms of the README mentioning bundled cryptogrphic code, it says that "Apache Pirk implements cryptographic software..." -- the Paillier class is one such

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pirk 0.1.0-incubating Release

Hi, +1 binding I checked: - name included incubating - signature and hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE good - No unexpected binary files in release - Can compile from source I noticed you’ve dropped “apache” from the release artefact names, IMO it’s good to keep it for

Dual-licensed logo PNG (CC-BY 3.0, LGPL 3.0)?

Hi, Our GSOC student wants to include a PNG for a CWL logo (for representing CWL services within Apache Taverna), but the original logo is dual-licensed: >From https://github.com/common-workflow-language/logo/blob/master/LICENSE.md > The Common Workflow Language Logos are (C) Copyright 2016 the

[VOTE] Apache Pirk 0.1.0-incubating Release

Hi All, The PPMC vote for the Apache Pirk 0.1.0-incubating release has passed after updating the cryptographic export information; it is a source-only release (no binary artifacts). We kindly request that the IPMC now vote on the release. The PPMC vote thread is located here:

Resulr, was: [VOTE] OpenAZ retirement

Ok, I think it's time to close this vote. Wev' got 7 +1 for the retirement : Bertrand, Colm, John, Mark, Roman, Ted, and me. I'll move forward from this point. Thanks ! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: