Re: [VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Best Regards, Nandana On Tuesday, September 27, 2016, Ate Douma wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Now that the discussion thread on the NetBeans Proposal has ended, > please vote on accepting NetBeans into the Apache Incubator. > > The ASF voting rules are described at: >

RE: [VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon -Original Message- From: Sergio Fernandez [mailto:wik...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 3:36 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator +1 (binding) On Tue, Sep 27, 2016

[DISCUSS] Olympian Incubation Proposal

Hi All, Please find below a proposal for a new incubator podling, Apache Olympian, formerly Titan. Apache Olympian is software designed to support the processing of graphs so large that they require storage and computational capacities beyond what a single machine can provide. This project will

Re: [VOTE] Apache Unomi 1.1.0-incubating release

Hi, -1 binding as it look like the source release has a dependancy on LGPL software. It may be that this is not actually a dependancy, and just an issue with the binary NOTICE file - but either way it should be fixed. Everything else looks good however. In the binary NOTICE you have: "This

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Streams version 0.3-incubating

Hi, Please place the artefacts to vote on here [1]. I checked (all 3 source packages): - name include incubating - signatures and hashes correct - DISCLAIMERS exists - all LICENSE and NOTICE good - No unexpected binary files - All source files have Apache headers - Can compile from source

Re: [VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

+1 (enthusiastic, non-binding) :-) 2016-09-29 8:29 GMT+08:00 David Lyle : > +1 (non-binding) Welcome! > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 7:53 PM, Bruno Flávio > wrote: > > > +1 (enthusiastic) > > > > On Tuesday, 27 September 2016 22:30:36 WEST Ate Douma

Re: Radical proposal: no initial list of committers

I like the idea, but isn't the initial list primarily a question for the Secretary. Is the Secretary ok with 1000 additional ICLAs arriving en masse from an even larger project? If so, then I think the solution is much simpler; *Let the podling decide* if it is only Mentors, every user who has

Re: [VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Welcome! On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 7:53 PM, Bruno Flávio wrote: > +1 (enthusiastic) > > On Tuesday, 27 September 2016 22:30:36 WEST Ate Douma wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > Now that the discussion thread on the NetBeans Proposal has ended, > > please vote

Re: [VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Bruno Flávio wrote: > +1 (enthusiastic) > > On Tuesday, 27 September 2016 22:30:36 WEST Ate Douma wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > Now that the discussion thread on the NetBeans Proposal has ended, > > please vote on

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Aether, renamed to Maven Artifact Resolver

+1 On 29 September 2016 at 01:25, Hervé Boutemy wrote: > Apache Maven received a code donation for Aether, that we renamed to Maven > Artifact Resolver to fix a trademark issue: > > http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/maven-aether.html > > The import plan is more

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Aether, renamed to Maven Artifact Resolver

Hi, I notice the ant repo contains other 3rd party code. I assume this is not going to part of the software grant? Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands,

Re: [VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

+1 (enthusiastic) On Tuesday, 27 September 2016 22:30:36 WEST Ate Douma wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Now that the discussion thread on the NetBeans Proposal has ended, > please vote on accepting NetBeans into the Apache Incubator. > > The ASF voting rules are described at: >

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Aether, renamed to Maven Artifact Resolver

+1 from me as maven PMC member and as one of the contributors to the code base (all 7 commits worth iirc ;-) ) On Wednesday 28 September 2016, Hervé Boutemy wrote: > Apache Maven received a code donation for Aether, that we renamed to Maven > Artifact Resolver to fix a

Re: [VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

> On Sep 27, 2016, at 1:30 PM, Ate Douma wrote: > > This vote will run for at least 72 hours. Please VOTE as follows > [X] +1 Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator > [] +0 Abstain. > [] -1 Do not accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator because ... Craig L Russell

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Aether, renamed to Maven Artifact Resolver

Hi, +1 from me. Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise On 28/09/16 17:25, Hervé Boutemy wrote: Apache Maven received a code donation for Aether, that we renamed to Maven Artifact Resolver to fix a trademark issue: http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/maven-aether.html The import plan is more

Re: [VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

Please VOTE as follows [x] +1 Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator (binding vote) Danese On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Ate Douma wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Now that the discussion thread on the NetBeans Proposal has ended, > please vote on accepting NetBeans into the

Re: [VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

+1 (enthusiastic, non-binding) On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:55 PM Julien Enselme wrote: > +1 (enthusiastic, non-binding) > -- > Julien Enselme > http://www.jujens.eu/

[VOTE] Release Apache Streams version 0.3-incubating

This is the third incubator release for Apache Streams, with the artifacts being versioned as 0.3-incubating. All issues raised during PPMC voting have been addressed. We are requesting two additional IPMC member votes, as we have received 1 binding IPMC +1 vote during the release voting on

Re: [VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

+1 (enthusiastic, non-binding) -- Julien Enselme http://www.jujens.eu/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

+1 (enthusiastic, non-binding) On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Tushar Joshi wrote: > +1 (enthusiastic, non-binding) >

Re: [VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

+1 (enthusiastic, non-binding)

Re: [VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

+1 (enthusing-not-binding) On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Jorge Flávio Costa wrote: > +1 (enthusiastic, non-binding) > > Em ter, 27 de set de 2016 às 17:30, Ate Douma escreveu: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > Now that the discussion thread on the NetBeans

Re: [VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

+1 (enthusiastic, non-binding) Em ter, 27 de set de 2016 às 17:30, Ate Douma escreveu: > Hi everyone, > > Now that the discussion thread on the NetBeans Proposal has ended, > please vote on accepting NetBeans into the Apache Incubator. > > The ASF voting rules are described at: >

Re: Git release candidate tagging policy? [was: Re: [VOTE] Apache BatchEE 0.4-incubating]

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Ate Douma wrote: > Hi Mark, > > On 2016-09-26 17:22, Mark Struberg wrote: >> >> Stian, this is established practice in the ASF since the very early days >> of playing with GIT. >> It is used e.g. in the following TLPs: >> TomEE >> DeltaSpike >>

Re: Git release candidate tagging policy? [was: Re: [VOTE] Apache BatchEE 0.4-incubating]

Hi Jochen! The discussion was about whether a local release build (GIT runs locally and a 'commit' doesn't push to the canonical ASF repo) should immediately get pushed to the ASF repo or just to a PMC owned 'other' GIT repo (e.g. on github). In various projects we prefer pushing to github

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Aether, renamed to Maven Artifact Resolver

*Big* +1. Lets hope, that Sisu follows (sooner, or later). It feels *so* unnatural, to have this stuff at Eclipse. On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Hervé Boutemy wrote: > Apache Maven received a code donation for Aether, that we renamed to Maven > Artifact Resolver to fix a

[IP CLEARANCE] Aether, renamed to Maven Artifact Resolver

Apache Maven received a code donation for Aether, that we renamed to Maven Artifact Resolver to fix a trademark issue: http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/maven-aether.html The import plan is more detailed at http://maven.apache.org/aether.html Please vote to approve this contribution.

Re: Git release candidate tagging policy? [was: Re: [VOTE] Apache BatchEE 0.4-incubating]

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 10:09 PM, Ate Douma wrote: >> Stian, this is established practice in the ASF since the very early days Could someone please enlighten me, what "this" is about? Thanks, Jochen -- The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!"

Re: [VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

+1 (Binding) On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Ate Douma wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Now that the discussion thread on the NetBeans Proposal has ended, > please vote on accepting NetBeans into the Apache Incubator. > > The ASF voting rules are described at: >

Re: Netbeans expectations (Was: Re: ASF doing too much? (Was: Re: TAC))

On 2016-09-28 05:20 (-0400), Isabel Drost-Fromm wrote: > > @Roman: If you step back and re-read the statement, maybe you can follow my > first intuition that this could actually be seen as praise to the person who > brought this issue up despite not being officially

Re: Radical proposal: no initial list of committers

In all honesty: What would I as a mentor do, to get the project rolling? Obvious: Ask the mailing list for an "Initial committer list". So, what's the point? Jochen On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > The NetBeans proposal (among many others in the past) has

Re: Netbeans expectations (Was: Re: ASF doing too much? (Was: Re: TAC))

I meant "officially" as far as champion or mentor. They are the people taking on the official responsibility and so the expectation is that they will be the most knowledgable and aware of issues, concerns, etc... AFAIK, the concerns that these stakeholders had were not shared w/ any of the

Re: Reuse Maven repository more was: Preliminary NetBeans cost findings

On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 5:13 AM, Jaroslav Tulach wrote: > There are also the [3rd party binaries used during NetBeans build](http:// > hg.netbeans.org/binaries/) - most of them available from Maven central. I > already [created a

Re: Netbeans expectations (Was: Re: ASF doing too much? (Was: Re: TAC))

I see no harm either... my concern was transparency and expectations. Nothing more. For something as complex as the NetBeans proposal we need to make sure these are clear from the start, imo On 2016-09-27 18:58 (-0400), Ate Douma wrote: > On 2016-09-28 00:50, Geertjan Wielenga

Re: [VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

+1 On 28 September 2016 at 16:58, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Great committer list! Don't worry if you don't get all the ICLAs signed > right away :-) > > On 27 Sep 2016 9:30 p.m., "Ate Douma" wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > Now that the

Re: [VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

On 09/27/2016 10:30 PM, Ate Douma wrote: > [X] +1 Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator Cheers Jean-Frederic - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Ease of release process and exit criteria

Agreed, it is also a good way to "integration test" the documented release process to have at least 2 release managers have a go. If there are no emails on a podling list with questions on how to do a release, then that hints of potential hidden knowledge, which as we see is critical for future

Re: [VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Great committer list! Don't worry if you don't get all the ICLAs signed right away :-) On 27 Sep 2016 9:30 p.m., "Ate Douma" wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Now that the discussion thread on the NetBeans Proposal has ended, > please vote on accepting NetBeans into the

Re: Reuse Maven repository more was: Preliminary NetBeans cost findings

On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Wade Chandler wrote: > ...more later when we get to an incubator... +1 -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

Re: [VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

+1 Best Regards Johannes # web: http://www.jgeppert.com twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep 2016-09-28 11:48 GMT+02:00 Martin Klähn : > +1 (enthusiasm) > > Martin > > Am 28.09.2016 9:33 AM schrieb "Emmanuel Lécharny"

Re: Reuse Maven repository more was: Preliminary NetBeans cost findings

On Sep 28, 2016 5:55 AM, "Sven Reimers" wrote: > > > 2. Use Maven repository as storahe backend for the plugin portal, so that > only the metadata is hosted at the portal not the module binaries.. > I think the terminology here is key. A "storage backend" for plugins.n.o.

Re: Reuse Maven repository more was: Preliminary NetBeans cost findings

Hi, if I understood Jaroslav correct he is proposing two changes 1. Download 3rd party binaries needed to build NetBeans from a maven repository (maven central, jcenter or if you behinf corporate firewalls a synced self hosted repo using nexus or artifactory) 2. Use Maven repository as storahe

Re: [VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

+1 (enthusiasm) Martin Am 28.09.2016 9:33 AM schrieb "Emmanuel Lécharny" : > An obvious > > [X +1 Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Ease of release process and exit criteria

On 20/08/2016 20:59, Mark Thomas wrote: > 3. Identify somewhere to put all the good suggestions for, and links to >examples of, smooth release processes and then pull all the links >and suggestions from this thread to that place. I have a vague >recollection of seeing such a thing

Re: Netbeans expectations (Was: Re: ASF doing too much? (Was: Re: TAC))

> 3) You write how the topic of "what value does the ASF provide to my project" comes up quite frequently in the incubator. Unless already done, I would like to see this documented under some stable URL to point people to. Not only do I get this question to from time to time, it might also help

Re: Netbeans expectations (Was: Re: ASF doing too much? (Was: Re: TAC))

(dropping board@, the part that I'm addressing is not relevant there) On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Isabel Drost-Fromm wrote: > ...3) You write how the topic of "what value does the ASF provide to my > project" > comes up quite frequently in the incubator. Unless already

Re: Reuse Maven repository more was: Preliminary NetBeans cost findings

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Jaroslav Tulach wrote: >... > One idea that keeps puzzling in my mind is to reuse central Maven > repository > more than we used to. If I understand correctly while the Maven central is > operated by Sonatype, it is just "leased" to

Re: Netbeans expectations (Was: Re: ASF doing too much? (Was: Re: TAC))

(again an explicit note for the mix of private and public mailing lists for those hitting reply-to-all after reading the below) Hi, I think we are talking cross-purposes here. Trying to summarize what I believe I'm hearing here, those actually involved, please correct if I'm totally off. For

Re: Reuse Maven repository more was: Preliminary NetBeans cost findings

This would be brilliant. Make it happen! Gj On Wednesday, September 28, 2016, Jaroslav Tulach wrote: > On sobota 24. září 2016 12:17:21 CEST, Daniel Gruno wrote: > > Certain services like the plugins hosting will rely on Legal giving the > > go-ahead for it,

Re: Preliminary NetBeans cost findings

On úterý 27. září 2016 11:27:29 CEST, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Geertjan Wielenga > > wrote: > > ...Together with Bertrand and the organizations volunteering to > > host this service, we'll need to find terms of agreement --

Reuse Maven repository more was: Preliminary NetBeans cost findings

On sobota 24. září 2016 12:17:21 CEST, Daniel Gruno wrote: > Certain services like the plugins hosting will rely on Legal giving the > go-ahead for it, otherwise we'll have to find other people willing to > host this. Hi. One idea that keeps puzzling in my mind is to reuse central Maven

Re: Ease of release process and exit criteria

+1 In practice this is often really a problem with many projects :/ LieGrue, strub > On Wednesday, 28 September 2016, 10:41, Mark Thomas wrote: > > On 20/08/2016 20:59, Mark Thomas wrote: >> All, >> >> It seems there is general consensus that this is a good idea. I'm

Re: Ease of release process and exit criteria

On 20/08/2016 20:59, Mark Thomas wrote: > All, > > It seems there is general consensus that this is a good idea. I'm > therefore going to do the following. > > 1. Draft some text to add to >http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#releases >and bring that back to this list for

Re: [VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

An obvious > [X +1 Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

+1 (enthusiasting) On Tuesday 27 September 2016, Ate Douma wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Now that the discussion thread on the NetBeans Proposal has ended, > please vote on accepting NetBeans into the Apache Incubator. > > The ASF voting rules are described at: >

Re: [VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 4:12 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > +1 (binding) > > -Taylor > > On Sep 27, 2016, at 4:30 PM, Ate Douma wrote: > > This vote will run for at least 72 hours. Please VOTE as follows > [] +1 Accept NetBeans into the Apache

Re: [VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Ate Douma wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Now that the discussion thread on the NetBeans Proposal has ended, > please vote on accepting NetBeans into the Apache Incubator. > > The ASF voting rules are described at: >

Re: [VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

+1 (expressing enthusiasm) Sven Am 28.09.2016 05:40 schrieb "Michael Müller" < michael.muel...@mueller-bruehl.de>: > +1 > -- > Herzliche Grüße, Best regards > Michael Müller > > Twitter: @muellermi > Blog: blog.mueller-bruehl.de > Web Development with Java and JSF: leanpub.com/jsf > Java