Hi,
+1 binding
I checked:
- name contains incubating
- signatures and hashes good
- LICENSE and NOTICE correct
- DISCLAIMER exists
- all source code has Apache headers
- no binary files in release
- can compile from source
Good to see simple build instructions in the README. A nice simple
The Apache Fluo (incubating) team is happy to announce the release of Fluo
1.0.0-incubating:
https://fluo.apache.org/release/fluo-1.0.0-incubating/
Apache Fluo adds distributed transactions to Apache Accumulo, and provides
an observer/notification framework to allow users to incrementally update
I could not find Julien Enselme as an initial committer on the NetBeans
proposal.
Craig
> On Oct 14, 2016, at 5:10 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Julien Enselme wrote:
>> ...From what I understand
> Git repositories are effectively cryptographically-signed (weak/strong,
> immaterial to this discussion), so a readonly mirror on ASF hardware is
> equivalent to a read/write repository living on GitHub.
Allow me to disagree. The hashes are cryptographically strong. But it's only
sha1
PS we could Force the use of the new -S git Option and verify it with the Pub
key stored at the asf.
Needs a few Experiments but might work.
Lg,
Strub
On Fri, 14/10/16, Mark Struberg wrote:
Subject: Re: [discuss] Apache
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Mark Struberg
wrote:
> The problem with github is that we (ASF) cannot give any guarantees if the
> main stuff doesn't originate from our own hardware.
>
Git repositories are effectively cryptographically-signed (weak/strong,
Hi Mark
Understood. And these are valid points to be discussed in the larger context of
whether ASF supports GitHub as a primary repository. Which in turn is outside
of the scope of this proposal. And which is where this OpenWhiz community will
have a vested interest in participating.
And as
The problem with github is that we (ASF) cannot give any guarantees if the main
stuff doesn't originate from our own hardware.
Not whether the ticket system doesn't loose all tickets (didn't that happen in
the past?) nor whether really only IP clean stuff got committed.
You e.g. have no clue if
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Julien Enselme wrote:
> I'd like jenselme
Ok, account creation request sent.
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional
I'd like jenselme. Email used in the ICLA:
julien.enselme [at] centrale-marseille [dot] fr
Thanks for you help.
On Fri, 2016-10-14 at 14:10 +0200, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Julien Enselme
> wrote:
> >
> > ...From what I
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Julien Enselme wrote:
> ...From what I understand here, my account should have been
> created...
It looks like it's not been requested so far - if you let me know what
Apache user ID you'd like to get, I can send that account request.
Hi John
This also ties into Mark’s question earlier on.
The OpenWhisk part of the proposal is currently being developed in GitHub and
the developers are used to the GitHub flow and features including but not
limited to GitHub Issues.
We have discussed this topic before proposing the project
Hi,
I sent my ICLA and Wednesday I received confirmation that it was
received. From what I understand here, my account should have been
created. Or did I missed something? Could this be because I
(deliberately) used a different email address in my ICLA than to
subscribe to the list?
Regards,
On
Sam,
Can your or someone representing the proposed podling explain why using
github as master is preferable to the current mirror strategy in use?
John
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 6:29 AM Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Greg Stein
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> Attached to this message is a proposed new project - Apache OpenWhisk.
>>
>> The text of the proposal is included below.
Hi all
This is a call for a releasing Apache S2Graph 0.1.0-incubating, release
candidate 6.
This is the first release of S2Graph.
Apache S2Graph community has voted and approved the release.
Vote thread:
Why isn't it enough to just mirror to github?
I only quickly read through the proposal and I'm not sure if thy just stated
that _currently_ the repo is on github.
With GIT it makes no difference at all where the repo is hosted IF you have a
track record (which ASF git-wip does, but github
17 matches
Mail list logo