Re: [VOTE] Apache S2Graph(incubating) 0.1.0 release RC6

2016-10-14 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 binding I checked: - name contains incubating - signatures and hashes good - LICENSE and NOTICE correct - DISCLAIMER exists - all source code has Apache headers - no binary files in release - can compile from source Good to see simple build instructions in the README. A nice simple

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Fluo 1.0.0-incubating released

2016-10-14 Thread Mike Walch
The Apache Fluo (incubating) team is happy to announce the release of Fluo 1.0.0-incubating: https://fluo.apache.org/release/fluo-1.0.0-incubating/ Apache Fluo adds distributed transactions to Apache Accumulo, and provides an observer/notification framework to allow users to incrementally update

Re: NetBeans next steps

2016-10-14 Thread Craig Russell
I could not find Julien Enselme as an initial committer on the NetBeans proposal. Craig > On Oct 14, 2016, at 5:10 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > Hi, > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Julien Enselme wrote: >> ...From what I understand

Re: [discuss] Apache OpenWhisk Incubator Proposal

2016-10-14 Thread Mark Struberg
> Git repositories are effectively cryptographically-signed (weak/strong, > immaterial to this discussion), so a readonly mirror on ASF hardware is > equivalent to a read/write repository living on GitHub. Allow me to disagree. The hashes are cryptographically strong. But it's only sha1

Re: [discuss] Apache OpenWhisk Incubator Proposal

2016-10-14 Thread Mark Struberg
PS we could Force the use of the new -S git Option and verify it with the Pub key stored at the asf. Needs a few Experiments but might work. Lg, Strub On Fri, 14/10/16, Mark Struberg wrote: Subject: Re: [discuss] Apache

Re: [discuss] Apache OpenWhisk Incubator Proposal

2016-10-14 Thread Greg Stein
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > The problem with github is that we (ASF) cannot give any guarantees if the > main stuff doesn't originate from our own hardware. > Git repositories are effectively cryptographically-signed (weak/strong,

Re: [discuss] Apache OpenWhisk Incubator Proposal

2016-10-14 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi Mark Understood. And these are valid points to be discussed in the larger context of whether ASF supports GitHub as a primary repository. Which in turn is outside of the scope of this proposal. And which is where this OpenWhiz community will have a vested interest in participating. And as

Re: [discuss] Apache OpenWhisk Incubator Proposal

2016-10-14 Thread Mark Struberg
The problem with github is that we (ASF) cannot give any guarantees if the main stuff doesn't originate from our own hardware. Not whether the ticket system doesn't loose all tickets (didn't that happen in the past?) nor whether really only IP clean stuff got committed. You e.g. have no clue if

Re: NetBeans next steps

2016-10-14 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Julien Enselme wrote: > I'd like jenselme Ok, account creation request sent. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

Re: NetBeans next steps

2016-10-14 Thread Julien Enselme
I'd like jenselme. Email used in the ICLA: julien.enselme [at] centrale-marseille [dot] fr Thanks for you help. On Fri, 2016-10-14 at 14:10 +0200, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Julien Enselme > wrote: > > > > ...From what I

Re: NetBeans next steps

2016-10-14 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi, On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Julien Enselme wrote: > ...From what I understand here, my account should have been > created... It looks like it's not been requested so far - if you let me know what Apache user ID you'd like to get, I can send that account request.

Re: [discuss] Apache OpenWhisk Incubator Proposal

2016-10-14 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi John This also ties into Mark’s question earlier on. The OpenWhisk part of the proposal is currently being developed in GitHub and the developers are used to the GitHub flow and features including but not limited to GitHub Issues. We have discussed this topic before proposing the project

Re: NetBeans next steps

2016-10-14 Thread Julien Enselme
Hi, I sent my ICLA and Wednesday I received confirmation that it was received. From what I understand here, my account should have been created. Or did I missed something? Could this be because I (deliberately) used a different email address in my ICLA than to subscribe to the list? Regards, On

Re: [discuss] Apache OpenWhisk Incubator Proposal

2016-10-14 Thread John D. Ament
Sam, Can your or someone representing the proposed podling explain why using github as master is preferable to the current mirror strategy in use? John On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 6:29 AM Sam Ruby wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Greg Stein

Re: [discuss] Apache OpenWhisk Incubator Proposal

2016-10-14 Thread Sam Ruby
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > >> Hello everyone, >> >> Attached to this message is a proposed new project - Apache OpenWhisk. >> >> The text of the proposal is included below.

[VOTE] Apache S2Graph(incubating) 0.1.0 release RC6

2016-10-14 Thread DO YUNG YOON
Hi all This is a call for a releasing Apache S2Graph 0.1.0-incubating, release candidate 6. This is the first release of S2Graph. Apache S2Graph community has voted and approved the release. Vote thread:

Re: [discuss] Apache OpenWhisk Incubator Proposal

2016-10-14 Thread Mark Struberg
Why isn't it enough to just mirror to github? I only quickly read through the proposal and I'm not sure if thy just stated that _currently_ the repo is on github. With GIT it makes no difference at all where the repo is hosted IF you have a track record (which ASF git-wip does, but github