Re: [VOTE] Apache Beam release 0.3.0-incubating

Not sure I understand. If the dependency is optional and scope provided, I don't think it's an issue. If it's not the case (I gonna check) and the resulting jar embeds the dependency it's an issue. Kinesis IO will be used by a very small part of users imho (only the ones who needs pipelines

Re: [VOTE] Apache Beam release 0.3.0-incubating

Hi, > We discussed about this dependency on the dev mailing list. Yep I read that discussion and it seems to me to be missing the main point. Yes you can’t have Category X software in a release but you can’t have it as a dependancy either unless it’s optional. > The dependency is not embedded

Re: [VOTE] Apache Beam release 0.3.0-incubating

Hi John Rat is supposed to run with the release profile. We are going to check that and why DEPENDENCIES file has not been checked. Regarding Kinesis, the dependency should not be embedded in any Beam jar or distribution. The user has to explicitly define the dependency to be able to use the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Beam release 0.3.0-incubating

Hi Justin We discussed about this dependency on the dev mailing list. The dependency is not embedded in any Beam distribution or jar file. The users have to explicitly define the dependency to be able to use the Kinesis IO. So I don't see any issue in that case. Agree ? Regards JB ⁣​ On Oct

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC4)

Hi, -1 binding due to LICENSE and NOTICE issues and including binary files in the source release. This was brought up last release and looks like it hasn't been corrected? For [1] - LICENSE and NOTICE are incorrect as they do not mention any of the bundled software - includes unexpected

Re: [VOTE] Apache Beam release 0.3.0-incubating

Hi, -1 binding due to incompatible license dependancy. Happy to change my vote if this is shown to not be the case. Everything checks out expect the dependancy of Amazon licensed software which is category X [1] this (closed) JIRA covers it [2] Note that it not enough just to not included the

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC4)

Hi, > The release artifacts can be found at : > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0. > 11.0-incubating-rc4/ It not clear to me what exactly is the release artefacts here, for instance why does this directory include jars? Can you please clarify. Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Apache Beam release 0.3.0-incubating

Hi, mvn apache-rat:check fails on your release due to the DEPENDENCIES file not having a header. If you don't need this file, please remove it. I would also recommend leaving apache-rat running all the time to avoid newly introduced issues. In addition, I notice that your build output includes

Re: [VOTE] Apache Beam release 0.3.0-incubating

+1 (binding), carrying over from dev vote Sent from my iPhone, Venkatesh > On Oct 28, 2016, at 2:22 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote: > > (repeating my vote on dev@beam https://s.apache.org/AYPs ) > > +1 (binding) > > So far I've successfully checked: > * signatures and digests

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rya (Incubating) version 3.2.10 RC3

Hi, > I've seen others do a thing that adds a new email address to an existing PGP > identity. Would that be included in what you are recommending? Yes, looks like we need to add some instructions here. [1] Thanks, Justin 1. https://www.apache.org/dev/openpgp.html

[VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC4)

Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as Apache SystemML version 0.11.0! The PPMC vote thread: https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org/msg01013.html And the result: https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org/msg01062.html The

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Rya (Incubating) version 3.2.10 RC3

Justin Mclean said: > You might want to consider signing the artefact with an apache email address > rather than a gmail one. I was just wondering about that because I just got my apache user name. (very excited!) I've seen others do a thing that adds a new email address to an existing PGP

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rya (Incubating) version 3.2.10 RC3

Hi, +1 (binding). Sorry for being a little late in reviewing. I checked: - artefact name contains incubating - signatures and hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE good - All source files have ASF headers - No unexpected binary files in source release - Can compile from source

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Rya (Incubating) version 3.2.10 RC3

Hello, The vote to release Rya (Incubating) version 3.2.10 RC3 has passed with 3 +1 votes. +1 (binding): Josh Elser Seetharam Venkatesh Sergio Fernández I will promote the artifacts to the central repo and copy them to dist/release --Aaron

Re: Permission to edit the Incubator wiki page

Added, happy editing! On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 3:53 PM Susan Cline wrote: > Hi, John, > > My username for the wiki page is SusanCline. > > Thank you, > > Susan > > > Hi, > > > > I will be filing the November podling report for Apache Edgent. > > > > May I please have

Re: Permission to edit the Incubator wiki page

Hi, John, My username for the wiki page is SusanCline. Thank you, Susan > Hi, > > I will be filing the November podling report for Apache Edgent. > > May I please have permission to edit this wiki page? > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2016 < >

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Fluo Recipes 1.0.0-incubating released

The Apache Fluo (incubating) team is happy to announce the release of Fluo Recipes 1.0.0-incubating: https://fluo.apache.org/release/fluo-recipes-1.0.0-incubating/ Fluo Recipes builds on the Fluo API to offer additional functionality to developers. They are published separately from Fluo on

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Fineract 0.4.0 (incubating)

+1 (binding) > On Oct 21, 2016, at 7:03 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > +1 binding > > I checked: > - name includes incubating > - hashes and signatures good > - DISCLAIMER exists > - LICENSE and NOTICE good (nice work there!) > - No unexpected binary files > -

Re: [VOTE] Apache Beam release 0.3.0-incubating

(repeating my vote on dev@beam https://s.apache.org/AYPs ) +1 (binding) So far I've successfully checked: * signatures and digests * source releases file layouts * matched git tags and commit ids * incubator suffix and disclaimer * NOTICE and LICENSE files * license headers * clean build (Java

[VOTE] Apache Beam release 0.3.0-incubating

Hi everyone, Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the Apache Beam version 0.3.0-incubating, as follows: [ ] +1, Approve the release [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes: *