Re: [DISCUSS] OpenWhisk Proposal

I spoke with Greg very briefly about the situation with OpenWhisk. He pointed out a couple of things to me. - He presented essentially an either/or situation to the podling, essentially either you can stay on your existing and wait to graduate when ASF can handle github as master, or use what

Re: [DISCUSS] OpenWhisk Proposal

I second John, about Github uses. The statement "As a community we would like to keep the master repository as well as issue tracking on GitHub " at currently stand is a no-no and putting in proposal would make it as goal which at this time not an option

Re: Need write access to the incubator wiki

No problem. Thanks John! On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 7:59 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > I've readded you. There were a few emails about the data loss yesterday, > apologies. > > John > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 1:49 PM Donald Szeto wrote: > > > Not sure why

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

Hi Bruce, On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 12:21 PM Bruce Snyder wrote: > Hi John, > > Proposals for new ASF projects are offered to this list for constructive > feedback. I am happy to help steer the RocketMQ proposal and project using > your suggestions. > > First, as explained

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

Some folks may remember my state of the feather session a couple of years ago when I called for more awareness of the ASFs role in open source beyond English speaking countries. This was prompted by a fact finding trip to China. RocketMQ and the team behind it was one of the projects I talked

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

Hi John, Proposals for new ASF projects are offered to this list for constructive feedback. I am happy to help steer the RocketMQ proposal and project using your suggestions. First, as explained previously in this discussion thread by Von Gosling, there was some company IP that was mistakenly

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

Hi Roman, The question about the contributors is a valid concern, and one that I raised myself with Von. This concern is hardly any different than what has been raised with many other project proposals to the Incubator over the years. One reason RocketMQ is interested in The Apache Way is to grow

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

This project is great with production usage from big giant in China, and open sourced a while. But yes, they are not connected with entire open source world yet, but I think now it's good time and ASF is the right place:-) RocketMQ is good sample for people who are willing to contribute from a

[DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

All, Please find below the draft board report for the incubator for this month. John Incubator PMC report for November 2016 The Apache Incubator is the entry path into the ASF for projects and codebases wishing to become part of the Foundation's efforts. There are currently 63 podlings

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

Hi，John，Roman: I am vongosling. The creator of RocketMQ. Please let me, on behalf of the RocketMQ project, to talk about a period of history. May be it can explain why we wrote "RocketMQ has open source since 2012". Actually, RocketMQ is the third generation Distributed MOM product within