Re: [VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.2-RC2

+1 (binding) Forwarded my vote from dev mailing list. I checked: - Build and simple examples - Signatures and headers - DISCLAIMER - NOTICE and LICENSE file Regards JB On 11/22/2016 05:13 AM, Kam Kasravi wrote: Hi IPMC Community The PPMC vote to release Apache Gearpump (incubating)

Re: [DISCUSS] Concur for Apache Incubator

FYI, the name 'Kontiki' is in use by Kollective Technology, as a former company name and now brand name [1] [1] http://www.kontiki.com --Mark On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 11/23/16, 6:19 AM, "Stian Soiland-Reyes" wrote: > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Concur for Apache Incubator

Yeah, the project still looks like an internal project, I hardly can find any document about it. I just went through the github project, there is only just one README. I cannot find any wiki pages or other document talking about the roadmap or high level design. I guess the Raft site[1] could

答复: [DISCUSS] Proposing Griffin for Apache incubator

No, none of the 3 mentors is from eBay. Kasper Sørensen(kasper...@apache.org) Uma Maheswara Rao Gangumalla(umamah...@apache.org) Luciano Resende(luckbr1...@gmail.com) Thanks. Alex

Re: JSON License and Apache Projects

I had never heard of that project. I am going to have to check that out! All of my projects use GSON these days, but I'd rather use an ASF project if possible. Thanks for the plug! On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 8:16 PM James Bognar wrote: > Shameless plug for Apache

Re: JSON License and Apache Projects

Shameless plug for Apache Juneau that has a cleanroom implementation of a JSON serializer and parser in context of a common serialization API that includes a variety of serialization languages for POJOs. On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 8:10 PM Ted Dunning wrote: > The VP Legal

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing Griffin for Apache incubator

Ah shoot ok :-) I'm used to seeing it next to the committer's names. I guess that works just as well. Are the mentors all eBay as well? John On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 8:04 PM Henry Saputra wrote: > Hi John, > > We have added this comment in the proposal: > > " > The

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing Griffin for Apache incubator

Hi John, We have added this comment in the proposal: " The initial committers are employees of eBay Inc. " - Henry On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 4:50 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Henry, > > Can you add initial committer affiliations to the proposal? > > John > > On Wed, Nov

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing Griffin for Apache incubator

Henry, Can you add initial committer affiliations to the proposal? John On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:30 PM Henry Saputra wrote: > Hi All, > > As the champion for Griffin, I would like to bring up discussion to > bring the project as Apache incubator podling. > > Here is

[DISCUSS] Proposing Griffin for Apache incubator

Hi All, As the champion for Griffin, I would like to bring up discussion to bring the project as Apache incubator podling. Here is the direct quote from the abstract: " Griffin is a Data Quality Service platform built on Apache Hadoop and Apache Spark. It provides a framework process for

Re: [DISCUSS] Weex for Apache Incubator

Sounds good to me. On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 4:54 PM Edward J. Yoon wrote: > Okay, if there is no more feedback then I'll send out a VOTE thread > tomorrow. > :-) > > Thanks! > > -- > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > > -Original Message- > From: hedh...@gmail.com

RE: [DISCUSS] Weex for Apache Incubator

Okay, if there is no more feedback then I'll send out a VOTE thread tomorrow. :-) Thanks! -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon -Original Message- From: hedh...@gmail.com [mailto:hedh...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Niclas Hedhman Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 9:07 AM To:

[VOTE][RESULT] Accept OpenWhisk into the Apache Incubator

This vote passes with 10 binding +1's, 3 non-binding +1, and no -1's Binding: John D. Ament Bertrand Delacretaz Ted Dunning Niclas Hedhman Sergio Fernández Felix Meschberger Jean-Baptiste Onofré Karl Pauls Edward J. Yoon Reynold Xin Non-binding: Liang Chen Debo Dutta

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Apache Metron (incubating) 0.3.0-RC1

+1 (binding) but with reservations about branding. Downloaded, checked hashes, built using Oracle JDK 1.8 and maven-3.2.1 on Ubuntu Linux, ran apache-rat. I also re-read discussions about 0.2.0-RC2 [1] and 0.2.0-RC3 [2] releases. In README.md, the product is described as “Metron"; should be

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Apache Metron (incubating) 0.3.0-RC1

My vote: +1 (binding) +1 git tag matches src (commit 7aea4ba35d1a931d72898bffd9725be3075fe8ca) (except site/ and .git*) +1 .asc signatures match, key in KEYS +0 .sha/.md5 hashes correct - could these have more conventional format and filenames? -0 Vote email didn't reference hash values or

[jira] [Resolved] (INCUBATOR-140) Typos on Joshua page

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Post resolved INCUBATOR-140. - Resolution: Fixed > Typos on Joshua page > > > Key:

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-140) Typos on Joshua page

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15690735#comment-15690735 ] Lewis John McGibbney commented on INCUBATOR-140: [~post] I've addressed this, please

[jira] [Created] (INCUBATOR-140) Typos on Joshua page

Matt Post created INCUBATOR-140: --- Summary: Typos on Joshua page Key: INCUBATOR-140 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-140 Project: Incubator Issue Type: Bug

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Commons RDF from incubator

http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#subproject says > To graduate as a subproject, the Mentors should start a VOTE thread on the > general list proposing that the IPMC signs off the graduation of the podling > as a subproject. This VOTEs should only be started once the project

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Commons RDF from incubator

+1 yes please graduate into a subproject (I'm still not sure what the process looks like, if there's anything actually required) John On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 8:49 AM Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > [Note: this is the IPMC vote on general@incubator - there's a > concurrent VOTE

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Apache Metron (incubating) 0.3.0-RC1

+1 binding checksums and signature are correct builds from source and unit tests pass disclaimer is correct release consists of source code and matches tag contents license and notice notes: - The Chef copyright in NOTICE is good, but the files copied directly from Bento should not have ASF

Re: [DISCUSS] Concur for Apache Incubator

On 11/23/16, 6:19 AM, "Stian Soiland-Reyes" wrote: >On 23 November 2016 at 11:40, Roman Shaposhnik >wrote: >> FIWI: these were my thoughts exactly. In fact, for a second there I >>thought >> that SAP was donating Concur codebase. >> In the spirit of

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Commons RDF from incubator

+1 (Binding) On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > [Note: this is the IPMC vote on general@incubator - there's a > concurrent VOTE thread on dev@commons] > > Since Commons RDF entered incubation, it has evolved the understanding > of its purpose,

Re: [DISCUSS] Concur for Apache Incubator

I think we should in principle aim for also a larger diversity in the initial committers for a straight-to-TLP, https://github.com/hortonworks/concur/graphs/contributors does not show anyone that is not working for Hortonworks - but the proposed committers (aka proposed PMC?) have broad ASF

Re: [DISCUSS] Concur for Apache Incubator

On 23 November 2016 at 11:40, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > FIWI: these were my thoughts exactly. In fact, for a second there I thought > that SAP was donating Concur codebase. > In the spirit of bikeshedding I propose Apache Thor (or Heyerdahl) 'cuz > you know: raft ;-) As

Re: [DISCUSS] Concur for Apache Incubator

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 5:43 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:40 AM Roman Shaposhnik > wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > wrote: > > > Hi Jitendra, > > > > > > I gonna take

[VOTE] Graduate Commons RDF from incubator

[Note: this is the IPMC vote on general@incubator - there's a concurrent VOTE thread on dev@commons] Since Commons RDF entered incubation, it has evolved the understanding of its purpose, developed and released code base that is now stabilizing. Although the Commons RDF developer community is

Re: [DISCUSS] Concur for Apache Incubator

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:40 AM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > Hi Jitendra, > > > > I gonna take a deeper look. > > > > My first feedback would be about the name: Concur is traveling/expense

Re: [DISCUSS] Concur for Apache Incubator

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi Jitendra, > > I gonna take a deeper look. > > My first feedback would be about the name: Concur is traveling/expense > solution (https://www.concursolutions.com/). > > To avoid confusion, maybe it would make

Re: [DISCUSS] Concur for Apache Incubator

Hi Jitendra, I gonna take a deeper look. My first feedback would be about the name: Concur is traveling/expense solution (https://www.concursolutions.com/). To avoid confusion, maybe it would make sense to choose another name. Regards JB On 11/23/2016 09:29 AM, Jitendra Pandey wrote: Dear

[DISCUSS] Concur for Apache Incubator

Dear all, We would like to start a discussion on accepting Concur, a java implementation for RAFT consensus protocol, into the Apache Incubator. Here is the link to the proposal on the wiki https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ConcurProposal The text of the proposal is included below.