+1 (binding)
On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 6:29 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Balaji Ganesan >
> wrote:
>
> > +1 Great to see the progress from the Ranger community.
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Suneel Marthi
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 binding
> > >
Pierre,
Where can I download or "consume" a project community? I would like to have
a local copy of it, right here. ;-)
Communities are living things, people, and not an immutable release
artifact. Incubation is not a release process, it is effectively an
education program for inexperienced people
Thanks Joe - I've added you to the commiter list :)
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Joe Spisak wrote:
> Awesome! Please sign me up as a committer - I've been working with Mu on
> MXNet (Amazon) and would love to get more involved with project!
>
> GitHub ID: jspisak
>
>
>
> Sent from Joe's iPh
Thanks Markus - I've added you to the proposal :)
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Markus Weimer wrote:
> On 2017-01-05 9:12 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>> I'd like to propose a new incubator Apache MXNet podling.
>>
>
> Awesome! If you still need a mentor, feel free to sign me up!
>
> Markus
>
>
Awesome! Please sign me up as a committer - I've been working with Mu on MXNet
(Amazon) and would love to get more involved with project!
GitHub ID: jspisak
Sent from Joe's iPhone
On 2017-01-06 08:44 (-0800), Henri Yandell wrote:
> Understood. I saw that Greg had recently approved another po
Jochen,
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 3:56 PM Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> -1
>
> Because I fail to see a problem with the current policy.
>
I'll point out this has already been canceled. I'd ask you to bring your
questions to the related discuss thread.
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/15550f5bf62
Added, happy editing!
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 3:16 PM Matt Rutkowski wrote:
> Thanks Marvin,
>
> It appears my Incubator Wiki ID is already "MattRutkowski" (read-only
> access) if this is the one we can add to the ACLs for:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MattRutkowski
>
> Carlos is on vacati
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Balaji Ganesan
wrote:
> +1 Great to see the progress from the Ranger community.
>
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
>
> > +1 binding
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Ramesh Mani
> wrote:
> >
> > > Dear Incubator members,
-1
Because I fail to see a problem with the current policy.
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 6:22 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm calling to vote on a proposed policy change. Current guide at [1]
> indicates that maven artifacts should include incubator (or incubating) in
> the version string of
Nicolas, all,
Despite your believes, you do release communities. Because the community is
the incubating project. Only after the community meets the criteria of
graduation a proposal is submitted, seconded by the IPMC and reviewed by
the board. The community works the code during incubation until
Awesome! Please sign me up as a committer - I've been working with Mu on MXNet
(Amazon) and would love to get more involved with project!
GitHub ID: jspisak
Sent from Joe's iPhone
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr..
Thanks Marvin,
It appears my Incubator Wiki ID is already "MattRutkowski" (read-only
access) if this is the one we can add to the ACLs for:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MattRutkowski
Carlos is on vacation today and will ask him to send his ID hen he
returns.
Kind regards,
Matt
From:
On 06.01.2017 17:32, Wade Chandler wrote:
[]
It's not a big deal YET, but http://codehaus.org is not reachable anymore.
yes, Ben told me he does not want to give the domain away right now.
When the time comes, he will think about donating it to the ASF. when
this will be I do not know
[
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Matt Rutkowski wrote:
> The OpenWhisk moderators would like to begin submitting status on behalf
> of OpenWhisk, but have also found we do not have write access to the Wiki.
> Previously, our mentor Felix Meschberger provided this for our
> first/initial report, bu
The OpenWhisk moderators would like to begin submitting status on behalf
of OpenWhisk, but have also found we do not have write access to the Wiki.
Previously, our mentor Felix Meschberger provided this for our
first/initial report, but would like to help him to not be the sole
persons respons
@wade it would be better to continue the discussion in the discuss vote,
rather than this vote which has been cancelled.
See
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/15550f5bf622ae3070b558505c8a0fd0ce3b23df3012d57de8b6d9f3@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
2017-01-06 17:32 GMT+01:00 Wade Chandler :
On 2017-01-05 9:12 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
I'd like to propose a new incubator Apache MXNet podling.
Awesome! If you still need a mentor, feel free to sign me up!
Markus
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubato
Hi,
I'm an Apache member and am already helping the Hivemall project as a
mentor. It is about time I join the IPMC :)
Thanks,
Markus
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands,
Understood. I saw that Greg had recently approved another podling to do
this. Though, assuming approved, there will still need to be some infra
headscratching on the 3,000 issues currently on the main dmlc/mxnet repo
and how imports are best done :) The simplest would be to transfer the
current rep
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 3:52 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> There seem to be some discrepancies in the proposal vs what they currently
> have. That and some comments in line.
>
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 12:12 AM Henri Yandell wrote:
>
> > Hello Incubator,
> >
> > I'd like to propose a new incubator A
On Jan 4, 2017 4:46 AM, "Jochen Theodorou" wrote:
On 04.01.2017 07:28, Mark Struberg wrote:
[...]
I'm a bit surprised that groovy still uses the org.codehaus groupId, but I
> guess they have a deal with Ben (the former owner and thus (former?)
> copyright holder of 'Codehaus').
> So while this w
On Jan 3, 2017 7:06 AM, "Guillaume Laforge" wrote:
When you say "it denotes a lack of maturity which is exactly the purpose
AFAIK", what do you mean my maturity?
Maturity in terms of how well it follows Apache processes and principles?
Or in terms of "the project is not ready for prime time"?
Fo
+1
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Wade Chandler
wrote:
> On Jan 2, 2017 7:53 PM, "Pierre Smits" wrote:
>
>
> +1 Drop the -incubator/-incubating expectation of maven projects
>
> It is not the code that is incubating.
>
> Whether a project of the ASF has a status (podling, tlp, attic, etc.) is
-1
Ralph
> On Jan 2, 2017, at 10:22 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> All,
>
> I'm calling to vote on a proposed policy change. Current guide at [1]
> indicates that maven artifacts should include incubator (or incubating) in
> the version string of maven artifacts. Its labeled as a best practice
On Jan 2, 2017 7:53 PM, "Pierre Smits" wrote:
+1 Drop the -incubator/-incubating expectation of maven projects
It is not the code that is incubating.
Whether a project of the ASF has a status (podling, tlp, attic, etc.) is
irrelevant for the code. The code is donated/owned by the ASF, and task
There seem to be some discrepancies in the proposal vs what they currently
have. That and some comments in line.
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 12:12 AM Henri Yandell wrote:
> Hello Incubator,
>
> I'd like to propose a new incubator Apache MXNet podling.
>
> The existing MXNet project (http://mxnet.io
Apache SystemML(incubating) is also a flexible, scalable machine
learning system[4].
> Apache SystemML provides an optimal workplace for machine learning using big
> data. It can be run on top of Apache Spark, where it automatically scales
> your data, line by line, determining whether your code
Hi Henri,
It's a great news! Looking forwarding to MXNet's coming to Apache Incubator :-)
Two minor comments:
> We currently use Github to maintain our source code,
> https://github.com/MXNet
In my understanding, the following url is correct one.
https://github.com/dmlc/mxnet
> === Relationshi
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 8:13 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 1:32 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> > Taking off my Infrastructure hat from within that issue, and speaking to
> > this from a Foundation policy standpoint ... I think this is probably
> okay,
> > if the docker image is na
29 matches
Mail list logo
