Re: Binary file inclusion (was [VOTE] Apache Toree (incubating) 0.1.0-rc4 as 0.1.0)

On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 10:24 PM Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 9:34 AM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 12:19 PM Marvin Humphrey > > > wrote: > > > >> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 6:41 AM,

Re: Binary file inclusion (was [VOTE] Apache Toree (incubating) 0.1.0-rc4 as 0.1.0)

On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 9:34 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 12:19 PM Marvin Humphrey > wrote: > >> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 6:41 AM, John D. Ament >> wrote: >> > However, regarding the >> > binaries. In a

Re: Binary file inclusion (was [VOTE] Apache Toree (incubating) 0.1.0-rc4 as 0.1.0)

On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 8:58 PM Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 5:47 PM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > > [3]: > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what-must-every-release-contain > > That document has been superseded. Official

Re: Binary file inclusion (was [VOTE] Apache Toree (incubating) 0.1.0-rc4 as 0.1.0)

Sorry, I'll clarify. On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 9:01 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > If you look in the tar.gz you'll see that it's R source code, and a JAR > for > > testing. Its not compiled code. > > Looks like the jars contain compiled code to me: >

Re: Binary file inclusion (was [VOTE] Apache Toree (incubating) 0.1.0-rc4 as 0.1.0)

Hi, > If you look in the tar.gz you'll see that it's R source code, and a JAR for > testing. Its not compiled code. Looks like the jars contain compiled code to me: ./sparkr-interpreter/src/main/resources/sparkr_bundle.tar.gz - Contains R code and a jar that contains class files.

Re: Binary file inclusion (was [VOTE] Apache Toree (incubating) 0.1.0-rc4 as 0.1.0)

On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 5:47 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > [3]: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what-must-every-release-contain That document has been superseded. Official Release Policy, curated by VP Legal, is here: http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy

Re: Binary file inclusion (was [VOTE] Apache Toree (incubating) 0.1.0-rc4 as 0.1.0)

On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 4:59 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Same thread. Specifically Mark T's response [1] and Craig's affirmation > [2] > > Not sure that applies here as I think we have compiled code without the > corresponding source. Can someone on the project

Re: LDAP changes to support podlings

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 8:51 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 8:25 PM Sam Ruby wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 1:37 PM, Felix Meschberger >> wrote: >> > >> > Hi Sam >> > >> > Like this very much. Thanks !

Re: Binary file inclusion (was [VOTE] Apache Toree (incubating) 0.1.0-rc4 as 0.1.0)

Hi, > Same thread. Specifically Mark T's response [1] and Craig's affirmation [2] Not sure that applies here as I think we have compiled code without the corresponding source. Can someone on the project confirm? Even then I would expect that to be an unusual exception where there was no

Re: [VOTE] MXNet to enter the Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Lieven Govaerts wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 5:20 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > > Hi Incubator folk, > > > >I would like to call a vote for accepting "MXNet" for incubation in > the > > Apache Incubator.

Re: [VOTE] MXNet to enter the Incubator

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 5:20 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > Hi Incubator folk, > >I would like to call a vote for accepting "MXNet" for incubation in the > Apache Incubator. > > The full proposal is available at this wiki link: > >