RE: [VOTE] Gobblin to enter Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Not signing up to mentor, but I will be watching and hopefully helping from the sidelines. -Original Message- From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré [mailto:j...@nanthrax.net] Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 11:27 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Gobblin to

Re: [VOTE] Gobblin to enter Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Happy to be mentor on it ! Regards JB On 02/17/2017 06:33 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: Hello Everyone, I would like to call a vote for accepting "Gobblin" for incubation in the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below, and is also available in the wiki:

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0(incubating) (RC3)

> IMO it best to follow current documentation than copy what other projects may > of done. Agreed. That’s why i hope some clear official documentation to be polished, rather than scatter in every apache project :-) BTW, in order to help our guys, we also arrange 2 articles in website about

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0(incubating) (RC3)

Hi, > I also want to know the correct distribution about NOTICE and LICENSE. also > including the LICENSE and LICENSE-BIN(why we must list the 2 different > license files when in source and bundle).. As explained on the dev list you need different NOTICE and LICENSE files because their

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0(incubating) (RC3)

I also want to know the correct distribution about NOTICE and LICENSE. also including the LICENSE and LICENSE-BIN(why we must list the 2 different license files when in source and bundle. it seems to different in many apache projects .we are confused when refering these projects ) IMO, if

[VOTE] Gobblin to enter Apache Incubator

Hello Everyone, I would like to call a vote for accepting "Gobblin" for incubation in the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below, and is also available in the wiki: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/GobblinProposal Please cast your vote: [ ] +1, bring Gobblin into Incubator [

Re: Forming of a Selection Committee for New Incubator Logo

John, I believe martin was just saying someone with a design inclined mind would be good to have on the committee to point out flaws related to UX issues (colour, layout, and so on). Ill also happily join the committee if you deem it appropriate. ~ Evan Hughes On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 at 10:13 John

Re: Approving flawed release candidates

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > While I agree with what both John and Marvin are saying, the key word here > is “discretion”. +1 for IPMC members applying discretion. I've submitted some suggestions which I hope other IPMC members will consider, and

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0(incubating) (RC3)

Hi, > - README points to "rocketmq community" as a github page Yes they are aware this is an issue. > - fastjson (missing NOTICE) Why is this an issue? Fastjson is mentioned in LICENSE and the 3rd party repo contains no NOTICE file (which is rather common sadly). > - commons-cli (missing

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0(incubating) (RC3)

On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:32 PM Bruce Snyder wrote: > +1 (binding) > > No showstopper issues found, only minor issues that will be ironed out in > subsequent releases (e.g., README needs some cleanup, need consistency in > artifact naming). > Do you have a full list of

Re: Trafodion

I would recommend reaching out to infra. You may need to do things like force working copy. John On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 1:57 PM Pierre Smits wrote: > Hi > > I tried to update the Trafodion page in the CMS, but I didn't find it in > >

Re: Forming of a Selection Committee for New Incubator Logo

Martin, Not sure I understand the comment. The logo submissions have been open for some time already. John On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:48 AM Martin Gainty wrote: > Hi John > > > might want to consider individuals with either design or photoshop > experience with previous

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Apache Metron (incubating) 0.3.1-RC4

Ha, yes indeed John :) On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 16:43 John D. Ament wrote: > +1 release contents look good. > > Please don't forget as a part of > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-589 I'll be expecting to see > you remove 0.3.0 once 0.3.1 is published. > > John

Re: Trafodion

Hi I tried to update the Trafodion page in the CMS, but I didn't find it in https://cms.apache.org/incubator/wc/browse/pierresmits-_SHvDy/trunk/content/projects/ What do I need to do? Best regards, Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM OFBiz based solutions & services OFBiz

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0(incubating) (RC3)

+1 (binding) No showstopper issues found, only minor issues that will be ironed out in subsequent releases (e.g., README needs some cleanup, need consistency in artifact naming). Bruce On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:46 PM, yukon wrote: > Hello Incubator PMC, > > The Apache

Re: Forming of a Selection Committee for New Incubator Logo

Hi John might want to consider individuals with either design or photoshop experience with previous apache logos in 2014 ron wheeler created "Senor Couche-Tard" aka "Shotgun" aka "The Maven Owl" http://es.listoso.com/maven-users/2014-11/msg00110.html *bon chance* Martin

Forming of a Selection Committee for New Incubator Logo

All, As you know, our logo submission deadline is this coming Monday (make sure you get your submissions in if you haven't already!). In order to support that, I believe we need to form some kind of committee to help form an opinion around which logos make sense and don't make sense, in addition