+1 (binding)
Verified checksum/signature; LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER look good. -C
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Bolke de Bruin wrote:
> Hello Incubator PMC’ers,
>
> The Apache Airflow community has voted and approved the proposal to release
> Apache Airflow 1.8.0
+1 (binding)
Jörn
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Tommaso Teofili
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
> Tommaso
> Il giorno lun 13 mar 2017 alle 14:48 Matt Franklin <
> m.ben.frank...@gmail.com>
> ha scritto:
>
> > Hi Incubator PMC,
> >
> > The Apache Streams community has voted
+1 (binding)
Tommaso
Il giorno lun 13 mar 2017 alle 14:48 Matt Franklin
ha scritto:
> Hi Incubator PMC,
>
> The Apache Streams community has voted and approved the proposal to release
> Apache Streams 0.5 (incubating).
>
> The dev-list vote succeeded with 3 IPMC +1s, so
Hello IPMC,
The vote for releasing 0.1.0 RC6 failed to pass.
Vote summary:
+1
Julian (binding)
Jignesh
-1
Josh (binding)
Based on our discussion in the vote thread [1], we will have a good
candidate for release in RC7.
Thank you to those who tried out the candidate.
[1]
Evan,
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 9:13 PM Evan Hughes wrote:
> Hey john,
>
> Still wantting to explore this venture?
>
>
Yes - was waiting to free up some time to make this happen. I think that's
going to start after next week.
> Just wondering why the choice of jbake
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 7:59 AM Shane Curcuru wrote:
> Looks amazeballs great!
>
> John D. Ament wrote on 3/17/17 8:53 PM:
> > Yeah, sorry about that. Was going to send out more direct links when
> > I had the website updates almost ready. Anyways here they are.
> >
> >
Looks amazeballs great!
John D. Ament wrote on 3/17/17 8:53 PM:
> Yeah, sorry about that. Was going to send out more direct links when
> I had the website updates almost ready. Anyways here they are.
>
> 1. The new logo, in a more web-ready format:
>
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 3:12 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Recommendations on placement? I'll note that the current layout isn't the
> layout when I first sent this email, I'm very much open to suggestions. At
> one point, I had them far apart, as well as much larger sizes.
Recommendations on placement? I'll note that the current layout isn't the
layout when I first sent this email, I'm very much open to suggestions. At
one point, I had them far apart, as well as much larger sizes.
John
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 1:59 AM Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>
I agree it's weird esthetically, but have your other concerns?
Jacques
Le 18/03/2017 à 06:59, Niclas Hedhman a écrit :
I don't think the ASF and the incubator logo should be placed side-by-side
like that (2)
http://incubator.staging.apache.org/
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 8:53 AM, John D. Ament
I don't think the ASF and the incubator logo should be placed side-by-side
like that (2)
http://incubator.staging.apache.org/
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 8:53 AM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> Yeah, sorry about that. Was going to send out more direct links when I had
> the
11 matches
Mail list logo