Re: Draft - Incubator PMC Board Report - April 2017

2017-04-09 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
Just a quick FYI: Just returned from a week of travel so I'm late with sign offs, but will do them tomorrow. -Taylor > On Apr 9, 2017, at 7:41 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > All, > > Below is the current draft. Unlike most months, most of the reports are > already signed off, just waiting for

Draft - Incubator PMC Board Report - April 2017

2017-04-09 Thread John D. Ament
All, Below is the current draft. Unlike most months, most of the reports are already signed off, just waiting for sign off from Weex. Thanks for getting this done quickly! John Incubator PMC report for April 2017 The Apache Incubator is the entry path into the ASF for projects and codebases w

Re: [VOTE] Apache DistributedLog release 0.4.0-incubating

2017-04-09 Thread Josh Elser
-1 (binding) your source releases still do not contain the DISCLAIMER file that John pointed out in rc2 [1]. * mvn apache-rat:check fails on `src/main/resources/DISCLAIMER.bin.txt` * Don't include 'Copyright 2017 The Apache Software Foundation' in the license headers of your source files. The N

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

2017-04-09 Thread Ralph Goers
Yes, please go ahead. Ralph > On Apr 9, 2017, at 3:06 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > Ralph, > > It looks like most everything is done. If you don't get to it, I'll update > the podlings.xml and content/projects/log4cxx2.xml file to reflect graduation > status. > > John > > On Fri, Apr 7, 20

Re: Revisit policy that all IPMC members have commit privs to all incubator repositories.

2017-04-09 Thread John D. Ament
On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 6:51 PM Sam Ruby wrote: > On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 6:29 PM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > [...] > > 3. The interface itself needs to be able to track committers and PPMC > > members differently. I've created > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIMSY-84 to track this nee

Re: Revisit policy that all IPMC members have commit privs to all incubator repositories.

2017-04-09 Thread Sam Ruby
On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 6:29 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > [...] > 3. The interface itself needs to be able to track committers and PPMC > members differently. I've created > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIMSY-84 to track this need (since > all committers == all members, but not all members

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.6.2 (incubating)

2017-04-09 Thread Josh Elser
+1 (binding) You must add your GPG key to [1] before promoting this release. * xsums/sigs OK * DISCLAIMER present * It looks like your NOTICE file can be essentially encapsulated by the LICENSE file. If the only "text" you're adding to the NOTICE file is a copyright text, you can just include

Re: Revisit policy that all IPMC members have commit privs to all incubator repositories.

2017-04-09 Thread John D. Ament
Sam Thanks for the long response, sometimes length beats crispness. Some comments in line, summary of my thoughts towards the end. I will say - I'm glad that it looks like we're aligned with long term goals. On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 1:42 PM Sam Ruby wrote: > On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Joh

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

2017-04-09 Thread John D. Ament
Ralph, It looks like most everything is done. If you don't get to it, I'll update the podlings.xml and content/projects/log4cxx2.xml file to reflect graduation status. John On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 1:10 AM Ralph Goers wrote: > Thanks for the info Greg! > > Ralph > > > On Apr 6, 2017, at 9:14 PM

Re: Revisit policy that all IPMC members have commit privs to all incubator repositories.

2017-04-09 Thread Sam Ruby
On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 11:09 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 2:23 PM Sam Ruby wrote: > >> What's the next step? Can I just work with the infrastructure team to >> make this happen? Do we need a formal vote? >> > Can you clarify what exactly you're going to ask infra to change?

Re: Revisit policy that all IPMC members have commit privs to all incubator repositories.

2017-04-09 Thread John D. Ament
On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 2:23 PM Sam Ruby wrote: > What's the next step? Can I just work with the infrastructure team to > make this happen? Do we need a formal vote? > > Can you clarify what exactly you're going to ask infra to change? I see that infra has made a gitbox specific change, I would