On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 5:17 PM, wrote:
> Continuing progress on converting to asciidoc.
John,
I can't tell what you're doing from these huge commits.
Are you changing any content?
If no data is being lost, how can we confirm that?
Does the method you're working on
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Donald Szeto wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The PredictionIO community has voted that 0.11.0-incubating-rc2 to be good
> for a source-only release. This thread is to facilitate a voting for the
> IPMC before a final official source-only release.
>
>
Hello ,
This is a call to vote on Apache Trafodion (incubating) release 2.1.0 RC3
(Release Candidate 3)
Apache Trafodion is a webscale SQL-on-Hadoop solution enabling transactional or
operational workloads on Hadoop. Trafodion builds on the scalability,
elasticity, and flexibility of
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 10:03 PM, Mike Jumper wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 9:01 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
>>
>> So OK, I'm going to vote +1 on the release. There's some questionable
>> stuff about the autogenerated files, and I think we can
The vote to retire Pirk passes with six binding +1's and one non-binding +1.
Thanks folks. Will push the podling through the retirement steps.
Josh Elser wrote:
Folks,
The Pirk PPMC have recently voted unanimously to retire the podling.
This decision, while heavy-hearted, comes on the tails
Sorry everyone, but I need to cancel this vote due to a discrepancy in the
PPMC vote. I'll resubmit this shortly.
Thanks!
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 9:46 AM, James Bognar
wrote:
> The Apache Juneau Incubator PPMC has voted +3 to release Apache Juneau
> 6.2.0-incubating
The Apache Juneau Incubator PPMC has voted +3 to release Apache Juneau
6.2.0-incubating RC1. This vote carries over +1 binding votes from IPMC
mentors.
John D Ament
Incubator PMC members please review and vote on this incubator release.
Apache Juneau is...
- A toolkit for marshalling POJOs
Retaining trademarks isn't required, especially if they aren't attached to
strong project.
On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 10:50 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> The "wrong" part (from a project's PoV) is that ASF retains trademarks...
>
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 10:56 AM, P. Taylor