Re: [VOTE] Daffodil into the Apache Incubator

+1 to accept On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 3:03 PM Steve Lawrence wrote: > Hi All, > > Based on the discussion on the incubator mailing list [1], I would like > to start a VOTE to bring the Daffodil project in as an Apache incubator > podling. > > The ASF voting rules

[VOTE] Daffodil into the Apache Incubator

Hi All, Based on the discussion on the incubator mailing list [1], I would like to start a VOTE to bring the Daffodil project in as an Apache incubator podling. The ASF voting rules are described: https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html A vote for accepting a new Apache Incubator podling

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SPOT 1.0-incubating

Hello IPMC members, Here are the instructions on how to build the release candidate once you download it. http://nolamarketing.com/client/apache-spot/download/ (If you don't see the *Validate Build* section use CTRL + F5 to refresh the page). Regarding the Licence comment, we updated the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SPOT 1.0-incubating

Hello IPMC members, Here are the instructions on how to build the release candidate once you download it. http://nolamarketing.com/client/apache-spot/download/ (If you don't see the *Validate Build* section use CTRL + F5 to refresh the page). Regarding the Licence comment, we updated the

Re: DISCUSS: Process for Donating New Codebase (New Architecture) into Apache Fineract TLP

Hi Ed, Once the Fineract podling accepts the donation, they would need to follow the IP Clearance guidelines found at [1]. The process for Fineract to accept the contribution is up to them, but they would likely vote on it, and expect Apache ICLAs from each of the contributors to the project

DISCUSS: Process for Donating New Codebase (New Architecture) into Apache Fineract TLP

Hi incubator, Apache Fineract is now a top-level project but we have a new major version of our software, a cloud-native architecture, that the Mifos Initiative would like to donate into Apache Fineract. I wanted to discuss the process of how the Mifos Initiative can donate this new version.

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Distributed Release Audit Tool (DRAT)

Yeah, RE: the below (sorry for top post), this already came up in the Creadur community and I encouraged them to contribute to DRAT and told them we’re welcoming. That said, I don’t want Creadur to be an umbrella project, and frankly DRAT *uses* RAT, but is not a fundamental part of Creadur

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Distributed Release Audit Tool (DRAT)

Hi Shane, On 8/10/17, 4:46 AM, "Shane Curcuru" wrote: (note mixed private/public lists) General questions, since... we haven't actually had any discussion yet. - Is there a particular hurry to bring this to pTLP faster than the traditional

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Distributed Release Audit Tool (DRAT)

Greg Stein wrote on 8/10/17 8:44 AM: > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 6:46 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote: > >> (note mixed private/public lists) ...snip... >> - Has the Apache Creadur project been consulted about the new project >> proposal, and in particular do they have any comments

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Distributed Release Audit Tool (DRAT)

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 6:46 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote: > (note mixed private/public lists) > > General questions, since... we haven't actually had any discussion yet. > > - Is there a particular hurry to bring this to pTLP faster than the > traditional general@incubator

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Distributed Release Audit Tool (DRAT)

John D. Ament wrote on 8/10/17 7:50 AM: > Just curious, but how do we know which marks the ASF actually owns? Rat > isn't a TLP so I'm a bit surprised we own "Apache Rat", or is it simply > implicit? We claim that all Apache software *product* names are ASF trademarks:

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Distributed Release Audit Tool (DRAT)

Just curious, but how do we know which marks the ASF actually owns? Rat isn't a TLP so I'm a bit surprised we own "Apache Rat", or is it simply implicit? John On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 7:46 AM Shane Curcuru wrote: > (note mixed private/public lists) > > General questions,

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Distributed Release Audit Tool (DRAT)

(note mixed private/public lists) General questions, since... we haven't actually had any discussion yet. - Is there a particular hurry to bring this to pTLP faster than the traditional general@incubator discussion period is? - Has the Apache Creadur project been consulted about the new project

Re: Updating ip-clearance web site

On 7 August 2017 at 00:14, Craig Russell wrote: > Hi John, > > Thanks for clarifying. > > I would like to confirm that ip-clearance web site is generated from three > source documents in two repositories: > > git https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator.git > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Distributed Release Audit Tool (DRAT)

Hi Everyone, Just as an FYI I've added a resolution to establish DRAT to the agenda. On item - 2 of the proposed PMC includes members without an Apache account. What to do in this situation? If they start only as committers, that's fine, but then we would create an account for them after the