Re: Accepting Fineract CN code into TLP Apache Fineract

2017-10-21 Thread Greg Stein
Easy peasy ... what you're looking for is this: https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ Just follow that process. Get the software grant filed with the Secretary. Will you be lifting the github/mifosio repositories whole? If so, then file a ticket with Infra to move them under the apache/ org

Accepting Fineract CN code into TLP Apache Fineract

2017-10-21 Thread Myrle Krantz
Hello Incubator, The Fineract community just voted to accept mifos I/O code into Apache Fineract. The code consists of all of the repositories found here: https://github.com/mifosio Here's the discussion thread:

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5 of NetBeans HTML/Java API

2017-10-21 Thread Mark Struberg
> Even though there is no > veto vote on releases, if someone raised a valid issue, the group might > postpone a release as well, even after +1s. Yes indeed. Sometimes a single person discovers a problem during the voting process and casts -1. A -1 always should come with good arguments.

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5 of NetBeans HTML/Java API

2017-10-21 Thread Mark Struberg
Hi Geertjan After the 72h is up you need 3 more (binding) +1 than (binding) -1. By having 0x -1 and 3x +1 the vote does pass _right now_. But of course we have to wait till the 72h are over ;) Looks very promising though. LieGrue, strub > Am 21.10.2017 um 14:55 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga >

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5 of NetBeans HTML/Java API

2017-10-21 Thread Wade Chandler
https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes It is technically both with nuances. Time and 3 binding +1s plus a majority +1s. The 72 hours is a participation enabler. The 3 bindings is the minimum required, but a majority -1s would be a

Re: [RESULT] WAS Re: [VOTE] Accept Science Data Analytics Platform (SDAP) into Apache Incubator WAS Re: [DISCUSS] Accept Science Data Analytics Platform (SDAP) into Apache Incubator

2017-10-21 Thread Tom Barber
great stuff! On 21 Oct 2017 12:27 am, "Raphael Bircher" wrote: > Hi all > > well... let's start then. But I have no Idea how ;-) The docu is a "bit" > outdate. Maybe someone can tell me how it works, and what is still done > manual and what is done within whimsy. > >

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5 of NetBeans HTML/Java API

2017-10-21 Thread Wade Chandler
+1 On Oct 21, 2017 08:07, "Mark Struberg" wrote: > +1 IPMC binding > > LICENSE, NOTICE, rat, dependencies, signing, etc all looks good. > > However when building it from the distribution zip on my macbook with > java8 144 I sometimes get test errors. > All of them in

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5 of NetBeans HTML/Java API

2017-10-21 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
Many thanks -- so, right now, Bertrand, John, and Mark have done binding votes -- i.e., two of our mentors and the VP Incubator. How many binding votes are needed or is it simply a question of time, i.e., at the time that the vote expires, if there's no -1, and only +1 binding votes, then the

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5 of NetBeans HTML/Java API

2017-10-21 Thread Mark Struberg
+1 IPMC binding LICENSE, NOTICE, rat, dependencies, signing, etc all looks good. However when building it from the distribution zip on my macbook with java8 144 I sometimes get test errors. All of them in knockout.js, but each time something different: Configuring TestNG with:

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5 of NetBeans HTML/Java API

2017-10-21 Thread John D. Ament
Here's my +1 to release. On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 8:43 AM Bertrand Delacretaz < bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Jaroslav Tulach > wrote: > > ...I'd like to ask you to hold the Incubator > > PMC vote to release:.. > > Here's my +1

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

2017-10-21 Thread Gary Wong
Add Crail - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John - *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi* - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary* With above projects, we can cover Storage-class memory oriented *Distributed