[IP CLEARANCE] Apache Felix Bundle Archive File Installer Extension

Hi, the Apache Felix project has received the contribution of the Bundle Archive File Installer Extension. - The code is attached to FELIX-5732 [0]. - The IP Clearance form has been committed [1]. - The acceptance vote has passed on the dev@felix malining list [2]. The clearance passes by lazy

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar 1.21.0-incubating Release Candidate 3

+1 (binding) So far I've successfully checked: * signatures and digests * source releases file layouts * matched git tags and commit ids * incubator suffix and disclaimer * NOTICE and LICENSE files * license headers * clean build (Java 1.8.0_151, Debian amd64) On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 6:52 PM,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control (incubating) 2.1.0-RC2

I’ll talk with the rest of the Traffic Control PPMC tomorrow about getting in touch with the author. For now, I’ve also opened a legal discuss question for their opinion: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-356 —Eric On Dec 12, 2017, at 7:28 PM, Justin Mclean

RE: [VOTE] Pulsar 1.21.0-incubating Release Candidate 3

Hi Henk, Thanks for the comment. I'll fix the extension. Regards, Nozomi 差出人: Henk P. Penning 送信日時: 2017年12月12日 16:12:37 宛先: general@incubator.apache.org 件名: Re: [VOTE] Pulsar 1.21.0-incubating Release Candidate 3 On Tue, 12 Dec 2017, Nozomi

Re: [PROPOSAL] PLC4X - proposal for Apache Incubation

> Can’t enter incubation without having code. I think this has been done before, but it's not relevant now. I agree with John that you should expect to need an SGA. Good luck and good coding! On Tue, Dec 12, 2017, 3:42 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Anyone have

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control (incubating) 2.1.0-RC2

Hi, Or perhaps you can ask the author of the file to license under more ALv2 compatible terms or is there a different list of password you can under under a more compatible license? Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [PROPOSAL] PLC4X - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi, Anyone have feedback or see any issues with this proposal? If there are none in the next couple of days I'll go ahead and call a vote. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control (incubating) 2.1.0-RC2

Hi, > The Apache “resolved” page places Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 3.0 > into category B, but the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike licenses are > category A for “unmodified media” [2] Only if it is included in binary form [1] that file is plain text I suggest you ask on legal

Re: [VOTE] Accept ServiceComb into the Apache Incubator

Done. Thanks, Roman. On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Craig Russell wrote: > Ping. > >> On Dec 11, 2017, at 7:23 AM, Craig Russell wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Can you please add this to >> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ProjectProposals so it can be

Re: [VOTE] Accept ServiceComb into the Apache Incubator

Ping. > On Dec 11, 2017, at 7:23 AM, Craig Russell wrote: > > Hi, > > Can you please add this to https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ProjectProposals > so it can be found easily. > > Thanks, > > Craig > >> On Nov 13, 2017, at 10:15 PM, Willem Jiang

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control (incubating) 2.1.0-RC2

Hi Justin- I’m far from an expert on Creative Commons, so please bear with me. Reference 3 below is from the OWASP SecLists Project[1] which is under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike (CC-BY-SA) 3.0 license. The Apache “resolved” page places Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 3.0