Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc3

Yes, we split up the issues into those we would fix for the Beta release and those for after that before but before leaving the incubator. This is all documented on the rc3 page on our Wiki, i.e., it is clearly documented which items we committed to fixing for Beta and which for after that and the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc3

Thanks a lot, these should be trivial to fix, will make issues for all and merge for the next release. Gj On Friday, February 16, 2018, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > I know the vote is over but you may want to fix this issues I noticed > before the next release: > -

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0 release RC1

My +1 (binding). So far I've checked: * incubating suffix * incubator DISCLAIMER exists * signatures and checksums match * LICENSE& NOTICE file look good enough, although it may require a further review * no binary files included in the source release * release builds Glad to see the good

[RESULT][VOTE] Retire iota

Hi, The vote passes with 9 +1 binding votes from: Pierre Smits Stian Soiland-Reyes Mark Thomas Sergio Fernández Greg Stein Leif Hedstrom Dave Fisher John D. Ament Justin Mclean Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0 release RC1

Hi, +1 binding I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes correct - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE ok - It’s impossible to tell if files have correct headers or not - no unexpected binary files - can compile form source LICENSE is missing this BSD licensed file [1] This

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc3

Hi, I know the vote is over but you may want to fix this issues I noticed before the next release: - How are these wav files licensed? [8] - Looks like you make have a dependancy on a 4 clause BSD license. [9] That’s Category X and not allowed. BTW I would of voted -1 on this release as it

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc3

Hi, I noticed a number of JIRA issue from the previous RC have not been resolved, including some involving IP provenance and licensing. [1][2][3] I assume they will be fixed in the next release? Thanks, Justin 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-312 2.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pony Mail (Incubating) 0.10

Hi, And also missing license in LICENSE for [1] Thanks, Justin 1. ponymail/site/fonts/glyphicons-halflings-regular.svg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pony Mail (Incubating) 0.10

Hi, I know the vote is over but I noticed a couple a minor things you may want to fix in the next release: - NOTICE has incorrect year - jQuery mentioned in LICENSE doesn’t seem to be bundled It also might be a good idea to say if you have any IPMC binding votes when calling for the vote

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0 release RC1

+1. License change looks good to me. On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 10:28 AM, YiZhi Liu wrote: > Just remind that the voting is ongoing. Please help to verify whether > the release candidate meets the standard and vote accordingly. > > 2018-02-13 23:37 GMT-08:00 YiZhi Liu

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0 release RC1

Just remind that the voting is ongoing. Please help to verify whether the release candidate meets the standard and vote accordingly. 2018-02-13 23:37 GMT-08:00 YiZhi Liu : > Hi all, > > As we have updated the LICENSE file which caused the failure vote for > Apache MXNet

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Pony Mail (Incubating) 0.10

With the existing IPMC votes in the original vote, and no further votes cast in the general@ vote, the release has passed. Yay :) I'll start prepping for this. With regards, Daniel. On 02/12/2018 02:08 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > > As seen below ( full thread at https://s.apache.org/F689 ), the

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc3

Thanks to all who voted! The release has PASSED with the following IPMC votes: +1 Ate Douma (binding) +1 Bertrand Delacretaz (binding) +1 Mark Struberg (binding) Also, 31 members of the Apache NetBeans PPMC and Apache NetBeans community votes +1 in the PPMC vote for this release. I will

Re: Incubation disclaimer in German?

Ok great ... I did tweak it a bit, but I thought it might be worth somehow make that available to others that might run into the same situation. This is the version, that's going to go into print: Bei Apache PLC4X und Apache Edgent handelt es sich um Projekte, welche sich bei der Apache

Re: Incubation disclaimer in German?

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 4:25 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > 2018-02-14 14:15 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz : > > > I am currently finishing some magazine articles about Apache PLC4X and > Apache Edgent and therefore sent Sally my documents fort he

Re: Incubation disclaimer in German?

2018-02-14 14:15 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz : > I am currently finishing some magazine articles about Apache PLC4X and Apache > Edgent and therefore sent Sally my documents fort he official „ok“ … I should > add the incubation disclaimer to my articles. As these are

Re: [DISCUSS] Resolution to graduate Apache FreeMarker to TLP

Since so far there were no objections and request for changes to the resolution, we are going to start the VOTE thread around next Monday. If someone intends to vote, please try to do the necessary work (checking things) now in the DISCUSS phase, rather than then. Thanks for the feedback we have

Re: Incubation disclaimer in German?

Hi Chris, 2018-02-14 14:15 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz : > ...I didn’t want to add the official English version, so I tried a > translation... My german is somewhat limited but your translation looks ok to me for a magazine article. -Bertrand