Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ECharts (incubating) 4.1.0.rc3

On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 10:07 PM, SHUANG SU wrote: > Thanks, Justin, > > I think I should remove the jar about rat from the artifact, and then > there is no binary code anymore. > > But I am puzzled about the definition of the term "compiled code". > Generally, the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ECharts (incubating) 4.1.0.rc3

Thanks, Justin, I think I should remove the jar about rat from the artifact, and then there is no binary code anymore. But I am puzzled about the definition of the term "compiled code". Generally, the JavaScript code does not need to be compiled to binary. The code in "dist/**" is also

Re: [VOTE] Retire the Slider podling

+1. Kudos to the podling for voting for retirement. The JIRA gives hope that there is user activity, but if the lack of commits and existence of a technical alternative in Hadoop suggests this is a good decision. Hen On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Billie Rinaldi wrote:

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache Dubbo (Incubating) 2.6.2 [RC1]

Hi, I did some check on the source zip and binary zip, the License and Notice files looks good. But I also found some issues here. As I cannot build the binary without doing some changes on the pom file, I had to vote -1 (binding) here. Here are the issues that I found: 1. there is bunch of

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.0.0-rc1-incubating Candidate 4

Hi Matteo, The PR looks good. I really like the script that does the check. Please make sure you run it as a routine to verify the release kit. Willem Jiang Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English) http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese) Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Mon,

[IP CLEARANCE] Arrow Ruby Library

Apache Arrow is receiving a code donation of a Ruby language library [1]. Please vote to approve this contribution. This is a lazy consensus majority vote, per the IP clearance process [2], open for at least 72 hours. Wes [1] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/arrow-ruby-library.html [2]

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.0.0-rc1-incubating Candidate 4

Willem, thanks for catching these issues. I have fixed the missing dependencies, specified the exact version of each of them and added a script to validate that new changes won't break it later. https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/pull/1820 I will cancel this vote and create a new

[CANCELED] [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.0.0-rc1-incubating Candidate 4

On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 5:32 PM Matteo Merli wrote: > Willem, thanks for catching these issues. > > I have fixed the missing dependencies, specified the exact version of each > of them > and added a script to validate that new changes won't break it later. >

[VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

Hi all, The Apache NetBeans community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1. We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator release candidate. Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) vote thread:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ECharts (incubating) 4.1.0.rc3

Hi, Releases at the ASF must not contain compiled code. You can if you want also produce a conviance binary for users at the same time but the source release needs to contain no compiled code otherwise it's not open source. Thanks, Justin On Mon., 21 May 2018, 7:10 am SHUANG SU,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ECharts (incubating) 4.1.0.rc3

Thanks, Willem. But I will explain the reason that provides an all-in-one artifact. I understand that one of the reasons for separating src and binary files is that in some project the compilation is depending on the target runtime environment and thus the products cannot be enumerated

[VOTE] Retire the Slider podling

After a long period of low activity, the Slider PPMC has recently decided upon retirement [1]. Please vote on whether we should retire the Slider podling. Here is my +1 (binding). [ ] +1 Retire Slider [ ] +0 No opinion [ ] -1 Do not retire Slider because ... This vote will remain open for 72

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ECharts (incubating) 4.1.0.rc3

If the release candidate isn't correct for the artifacts you need to roll an rc4 which might be two files not one and send that for a vote. On Sat, May 19, 2018, 22:34 Willem Jiang wrote: > Hi, > > As there is only one zip file, I guess it just the src distribution. >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SkyWalking (incubating) version 5.0.0-beta

Hi, IPMC I am asking the release vote, again. :) Haven't had one yet. Hope we can have enough vote in 72 hours. Thanks. Sheng Wu Apache SkyWalking From Wu Sheng 's phone. ---Original--- From: ".??"<8082...@qq.com> Date: Fri, May 18, 2018 10:06 AM To:

Re: scala/play community?

Seems there is no big enthusiasm - which is what i kind of expected ;), so I guess I'll keep it on github for now (https://github.com/rmannibucau/playx). If anyone becomes interested and feels we can create a community, dont hesitate to ping me. Thanks guys. Le jeu. 17 mai 2018 02:55, Willem

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.0.0-rc1-incubating Candidate 4

Hi, As there are some License issues in the binary distribution (please check the section4 for more information), I had to vote -1 (binding). Here are the verifications which I did 1. check the checksums and verify the KEY. These KEY are not signed by the others, so I got the warning WARNING: