Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.3.0 release RC0

+1 (binding) tested checksums and building from source on Ubuntu 16. -s On 10.09.2018 07:41, Sergio Fernández wrote: +1 (binding) So far I've checked: * signatures and digests (md5 checksums can be removed) * source releases file layouts * matched git tags and commit ids * incubator suffix an

[VOTE] Apache Gobblin 0.13.0 release RC2

The Apache Gobblin community has voted on and approved the release of Apache Gobblin 0.13.0 (incubating): https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@gobblin.incubator.apache.org/msg02175.html Results: 3 binding +1 votes No 0 votes No -1 votes The feedback from previous release candidates has been address

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Pulsar (incubating) as a TLP

Hi, Just a couple of minor things I noticed on the website which checking it. While this is mostly red [1] all seems all links are there other than Events? I'm curious to why organisations are mention on the team page [2] and why Matteo is listed as the co-creator here [3]. Nothing that would

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Pulsar (incubating) as a TLP

Strong +1. I've been following from a distance: growth of the community is obvious, as well as maturing project governance evidenced by working through *all* issues that have been brought up. Mentors are continuing onto the PMC. I'm confident that Pulsar is ready to be a TLP. On Mon, Sep 10, 2018

[DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Pulsar (incubating) as a TLP

Hi - The Apache Pulsar project is ready to graduate as a TLP. They entered Incubation on June 1, 2017, have had many releases and have grown the community. At the mentors request they did a maturity model analysis [1] and wrote contribution guidelines. [2] The Graduation Proposal was written a

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.3.0 release RC0

Thanks Justin. The vote to release MXNet (incubating) 1.3.0 is still open. It will end tomorrow(Tuesday, September 11th, 11:30am PDT). Henri, Suneel, Marcus, Sebastian, Jin could you please help review and vote? Thanks, Roshani On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 5:40 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > HI, > > >

Re: Project probe: AsyncFlows Framework

Hi Constantine, I took a few minutes to look into your project. You have some interesting ideas. You might want to look into the features of some current Apache projects and incubator podlings. (1) Events Pulsar Kafka ActiveMQ (2) Topologies Storm Heron Airflow I’m sure there are many. Regards

Re: Project probe: AsyncFlows Framework

Hi, > 3. Is the project suitable for Apach Incubator considering that there are > already projects for the similar domain at Apache? We don’t care if there are similar project already incubator or exist as top level projects. > 4. Is the project suitable for Apache Incubator considering the cur

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.3.0 release RC0

HI, > It will be great if more members can test the release and vote by tomorrow. I suggest you ask you mentors to vote as they are IPMC member and can cast binding votes. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubs

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.3.0 release RC0

Thanks for testing the release and voting. I will remove md5 hashes as instructed. Just a reminder: voting will end tomorrow, (Tuesday, September 11th, 11:30am PDT). It will be great if more members can test the release and vote by tomorrow. - Roshani On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 10:42 PM Sergio Ferná

Re: New podlings reporting schedule is monthly for 3 months

Hi, So it turns out the podling was (rightly) confused because there’s no mention of that requirement here [1], but it is listed here [3]. If there’s no objections I’ll replace: "Such reviews SHALL occur at least quarterly.” With the following: “Podling SHALL report monthly for their first 3

Re: Incubator Workshop

Hi, > For my part, most courseware is just an *extremely* slow form of reading. I > really don't need to have somebody read to me. I tend to agree I also prefer to read something than watch a video, when I do I using speed it up. However different people learn in different ways. Currently we ha

Re: Email to be sent to inactive mentors

Hi, > And thankfully, I'm on this list and looked this up here--as this came as a > bit of a shock. It's not that I didn't already know that Daniel was > overwhelmed. :) It's just I didn't expect the forthcoming "remove from > Annotator" email. He asked to be removed as a mentor, because as fa

Project probe: AsyncFlows Framework

Hello All! I would like to probe if there is interest in the project AsyncFlows that define DSL for asynchronous programming. The project is approximately the same domain as Netty, MINA, HttpCore Async, Vert.X - asynchronous network applications. However I belive tha the project provides higher le

Re: Email to be sent to inactive mentors

And thankfully, I'm on this list and looked this up here--as this came as a bit of a shock. It's not that I didn't already know that Daniel was overwhelmed. :) It's just I didn't expect the forthcoming "remove from Annotator" email. I believe I wrote that initial XML, and that I'd filled it in

Re: Incubator release checklist

Hi - I like the wiki idea. Under each checkpoint we can offer shell commands that have been useful for various mentors. As Mentors we should be referring prolongs to this process as well and if they wish to create unique scripts for their products then so much the better. Here is a checker.sh

Re: Incubator release checklist

Releases are invariably created from a particular commit from the source control system (usually a git commit these days). I think it’s important to check that the contents of the source tarball match the contents of the source control system at that commit. (To do this, I unpack the tar file in

[jira] [Updated] (INCUBATOR-221) The release of OpenWhisk 1.12.0-incubating: OpenWhisk python, php and swift runtimes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vincent Hou updated INCUBATOR-221: -- Description: OpenWhisk community is working on its first release 1.12.0-incubating of OpenW

[jira] [Updated] (INCUBATOR-221) The release of OpenWhisk 1.12.0-incubating: OpenWhisk python, php and swift runtimes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vincent Hou updated INCUBATOR-221: -- Description: OpenWhisk community is working on its first release 1.12.0-incubating of OpenW

[jira] [Created] (INCUBATOR-221) The release of OpenWhisk 1.12.0-incubating: OpenWhisk python, php and swift runtimes

Vincent Hou created INCUBATOR-221: - Summary: The release of OpenWhisk 1.12.0-incubating: OpenWhisk python, php and swift runtimes Key: INCUBATOR-221 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-221

[jira] [Updated] (INCUBATOR-220) The release of OpenWhisk 1.12.0-incubating: OpenWhisk nodejs, java and docker runtimes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vincent Hou updated INCUBATOR-220: -- Description: OpenWhisk community is working on its first release 1.12.0-incubating of OpenW

[jira] [Updated] (INCUBATOR-220) The release of OpenWhisk 1.12.0-incubating: OpenWhisk nodejs, java and docker runtimes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vincent Hou updated INCUBATOR-220: -- Description: OpenWhisk community is working on its first release 1.12.0-incubating of OpenW

[jira] [Updated] (INCUBATOR-220) The release of OpenWhisk 1.12.0-incubating: OpenWhisk nodejs, java and docker runtimes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vincent Hou updated INCUBATOR-220: -- Description: OpenWhisk community is working on its first release 1.12.0-incubating of OpenW

[jira] [Closed] (INCUBATOR-217) The release of OpenWhisk 0.9.8-incubating: OpenWhisk wskdeploy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vincent Hou closed INCUBATOR-217. - Resolution: Resolved > The release of OpenWhisk 0.9.8-incubating: OpenWhisk wskdeploy > --

[jira] [Created] (INCUBATOR-220) The release of OpenWhisk 1.12.0-incubating: OpenWhisk nodejs, java and docker runtimes

Vincent Hou created INCUBATOR-220: - Summary: The release of OpenWhisk 1.12.0-incubating: OpenWhisk nodejs, java and docker runtimes Key: INCUBATOR-220 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-220

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-217) The release of OpenWhisk 0.9.8-incubating: OpenWhisk wskdeploy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16609473#comment-16609473 ] Vincent Hou commented on INCUBATOR-217: --- This module wskdeploy of openwhisk has

[VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk (Incubating): OpenWhisk catalog and apigateway 0.9.0 [RC1]

Dear IPMC members, This is a call for vote to release Apache OpenWhisk (Incubating): OpenWhisk catalog and apigateway 0.9.0 [RC1]. The Apache OpenWhisk community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache OpenWhisk (Incubating): catalog and apigateway, Version 0.9.0. We now kindly

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk (Incubating): wskdeploy module 0.9.8

Hi all, Thanks a lot for taking the time to vote the release 0.9.8 of OpenWhisk: wskdeploy module The vote is passed with 3 +1s (binding). Binding +1: Bertrand Delacretaz Jim Jagielski Justin Mclean There is no -1 vote or 0 vote. I will proceed with the next steps for the release. Best wis

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk (Incubating): wskdeploy module 0.9.8

Hi everyone, Thank you for your votes. This mail thread is closed now, since it has been open for over 72 hours. I will consolidate the votes and send off the result. Thanks. Best wishes. Vincent Hou (侯胜博) Advisory Software Engineer, OpenWhisk Contributor, Open Technology, IBM Cloud Notes ID

Re: Incubator Workshop

If the course doesn't involve actually doing things like checking releases, then a good, well indexed and cross referenced FAQ page is more useful (and the ones we have are very useful, speaking from experience). For my part, most courseware is just an *extremely* slow form of reading. I really do

[ANNOUNCE] Release Apache Dubbo (Incubating) 2.6.3 [RC5]

Hi, All, I am pleased to announce that the Incubator PMC has approved the vote of Apache Dubbo (Incubating) 2.6.3 [RC5]. The vote has passed with, * 3 +1 (binding) votes: Justin Mclean Mark Thomas Willem Jiang * 1 +1 (non-binding) votes: Huxing Zhang Thank you all for help verifying

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Dubbo (Incubating) 2.6.3 [RC5]

> Just a quick note for binary release, it only includes the dubbo > jars. It could be more convenience for the end user if we can include > the third party dependencies jars in the binary release. Yes, this is a point that I have seen some people have also put out in the community, but sadly, t

Re: New podlings reporting schedule is monthly for 3 months

> It looks like Mick > added them without any prompting, but I'm not sure if there was any off > list discussion about it. That was just a bias for action. The reporting schedule had been entered into podlings.xml as group 3, and I just hurried to write the report on the presumption that cut-

Re: Incubator release checklist

Hi, I regard a wiki as good as an svn or git repo as it also has version-control. Best regards, Pierre Smits *Apache Trafodion , Vice President* *Apache Directory , PMC Member* Apache Incubator , committe

Re: Incubator release checklist

Hi, > So there are not somewhere in an incubator repo? Only here in the ml? I’m not sure where they would live, if you can find a place please suggest it. Perhaps the wiki would be a better place? Thanks, Justin - To unsubscrib

Re: Default project guidelines

Hi, Little off topic but I’ll bite. The context was that this is about giving a default set of rules to podlings so that they don’t copy and past other projects guidelines that are not in line with the Apache Way. > In the case of on- and off-boarding members of the privileged ranks (which > is

Re: Incubator release checklist

So there are not somewhere in an incubator repo? Only here in the ml? Best regards, Pierre Smits *Apache Trafodion , Vice President* *Apache Directory , PMC Member* Apache Incubator , committer *Apache OFB

Re: Incubator release checklist

HI, > Are these kind of check scripts somewhere available to all? It seems to me > that such a set would benefit many (as in: many hands make light work). They are now I just posted them here. :-) Feel free to use them if they help you. But I have also shown them in previous incubator talks I’v

Re: Incubator release checklist

Are these kind of check scripts somewhere available to all? It seems to me that such a set would benefit many (as in: many hands make light work). Best regards, Pierre Smits *Apache Trafodion , Vice President* *Apache Directory , PMC M

Re: Default project guidelines

Consensus is a 'potential' outcome, and more often than not regarded as the 'must have'y rule in projects of the ASF: we must have consensus on who gets privileges to commit, to get PMC privileges... Achieving consensus for each and every issue arising in a project (whether it is in the incubator,