Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache Weex (Incubating) 0.20.0 [RC1]

2018-11-28 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) I think the NOTICE & DISCLAIMER are not fully complete (missing Weex name for instance), it should be updated for the next release. Else: - legal files are there - headers are there - signatures are OK and verified Regards JB On 26/11/2018 15:11, Jonathan Dong wrote: > Dear IPMC

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache Weex (Incubating) 0.20.0 [RC1]

2018-11-28 Thread Gosling Von
+1 (binding) I've checked the following: * Disclaimer * License * Notice * Compile from source * Rat checks for headers Notice: During podling stage, we are assigned apache email, it would be better if we could use the apache email to signature the src release. Best Regards, Von Gosling > 在

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache Weex (Incubating) 0.20.0 [RC1]

2018-11-28 Thread Adam Feng
+1 (non-binding) I checked: - LICENCE is good - NOTICE is ok - signature and hashes good - NO binary in source release - Can compile from source Thanks. Adam Feng 在 2018年11月29日 +0800 AM12:08,Atri Sharma ,写道: > +1 (non binding). > > Headers and licenses look fine, with no unexpected files > > On

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache OpenWhisk (Incubating) Composer module 0.9.0 (rc1)

2018-11-28 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, It's also best to wait at least 72 hours to give people a chance to vote. Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache OpenWhisk (Incubating) Composer module 0.9.0 (rc1)

2018-11-28 Thread Dave Grove
This vote still needs two additional +1 binding votes to pass. (Bertrand Delacretaz's binding +1 from the Podling PPMC vote [1] carries to this VOTE). I would appreciate it if the other OpenWhisk podling mentors or IPMC members could please vote. thanks, --dave [1]

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache Weex (Incubating) 0.20.0 [RC1]

2018-11-28 Thread Atri Sharma
+1 (non binding). Headers and licenses look fine, with no unexpected files On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 at 8:37 PM, Liang Chen wrote: > +1(non-binding) > > I checked: > - some part miss incubating in name: NOTICE, README DISCLAIMER,etc. (not > big > issue, please add in the next release) > - Signatures

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache Weex (Incubating) 0.20.0 [RC1]

2018-11-28 Thread Liang Chen
+1(non-binding) I checked: - some part miss incubating in name: NOTICE, README DISCLAIMER,etc. (not big issue, please add in the next release) - Signatures and hashed good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE is fine - NOTICE exists - source file have ASF headers - No unexpected binary files

Re: [VOTE] Retire Quickstep podling from Apache Incubator

2018-11-28 Thread Liang Chen
+1 Regards Liang -- Sent from: http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Retire Quickstep podling from Apache Incubator

2018-11-28 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) Regards JB On 28/11/2018 01:03, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > after a discussion with the Quickstep community: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6c4998e6feaec2651511a0d461d45924847135b60aa00e084301bc59@%3Cdev.quickstep.apache.org%3E > and a formal passing vote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Retire Quickstep podling from Apache Incubator

2018-11-28 Thread Furkan KAMACI
+1 binding Kind Regards, Furkan KAMACI On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 12:53 PM 吴晟 Sheng Wu wrote: > +1 binding. > > > > Sheng Wu > Apache SkyWalking, ShardingSphere, Zipkin > > From Wu Sheng 's phone. > > > -- Original -- > From: Willem Jiang > Date: Wed,Nov 28,2018

Re: [VOTE] Retire Quickstep podling from Apache Incubator

2018-11-28 Thread ???? Sheng Wu
+1 binding. Sheng Wu Apache SkyWalking, ShardingSphere, Zipkin From Wu Sheng 's phone. -- Original -- From: Willem Jiang Date: Wed,Nov 28,2018 4:52 PM To: general Subject: Re: [VOTE] Retire Quickstep podling from Apache Incubator +1 binding. Willem Jiang

Re: [VOTE] Retire Quickstep podling from Apache Incubator

2018-11-28 Thread Willem Jiang
+1 binding. Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 8:03 AM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > Hi! > > after a discussion with the Quickstep community: > >