[VOTE] Release Apache Training - Navigating the ASF Incubator Process 1.0 (incubating)

2019-06-08 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, This is a call for a releasing Apache Training Navigating the ASF Incubator Process 1.0 (incubating) This is the first release for the Apache Training product. The vote result can be found here:

[DISCUSS] Release of Apache Training - Navigating the ASF Incubator Process 1.0 (incubating)

2019-06-08 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Please keep the discussion here and not in the vote thread, Even if not voting, mentors and IPMC members may want to talk a look at the material as it is based on several years of talks at ApacheCon and elsewhere. The idea here is that any IPMC person should be able to take this material

Re: [DISCUSS] check LICENSE and NOTICE for Apache Tuweni

2019-06-08 Thread Antoine Toulme
Is there anything else I need to get looked at? > On Jun 6, 2019, at 8:45 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > Thanks Justin. > >> On Jun 3, 2019, at 14:30, Justin Mclean wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >>> If that’s no trouble, I’d rather have the text inlined and in the LICENSE >>> file. Please let me know

Re: [IMPORTANT] Board proposal on podling releases

2019-06-08 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I think it would be a mistake to include the word serious in the > proposal that you are asking for board approval. That likely will > result in a 'no' response. As would any request that that board > approve anything that is illegal, like distributing code without > complying with the

Re: [IMPORTANT] Board proposal on podling releases

2019-06-08 Thread Sam Ruby
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 8:57 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > > 1) Is it legal to include GPL licensed software in releases? The > > answer is yes... as long as we comply with the terms of that license. > > In the case of strong copyleft licenses, that could mean that the > > podling release

Re: [IMPORTANT] Board proposal on podling releases

2019-06-08 Thread Davor Bonaci
I think my position is well-known, but I'll restate it for completeness: (1) Podling releases are foundation releases; no exceptions. They are distributed in the same way, adopted by a foundation PMC in the same manner, and they being with word "Apache". We are responsible for them. (2) IPMC

Re: [IMPORTANT] Board proposal on podling releases

2019-06-08 Thread Julian Hyde
We’re trying to nail down the definition of “serious”. May I suggest that we divide the guidelines into MAY, SHOULD and MUST. Anything with MUST is mandatory for all podling releases. The list may or may not be the same as for TLP releases. Julian Sent from my iPad > On Jun 7, 2019, at

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache OpenWhisk Runtime Node.js v1.14.0 (incubating)

2019-06-08 Thread Sobkowiak Krzysztof
+1 Best regards Krzysztof On 06.06.2019 10:49, James Thomas wrote: Dear IPMC members, This is a call for vote to release Apache OpenWhisk Runtime Node.js v1.14.0 (incubating) The Apache OpenWhisk community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache OpenWhisk Runtime Node.js