Re: IP Clearance Process for Incubating projects

Don’t forget to file the forms with the secretary. On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 04:53, York Shen wrote: > > Just to be clear the ICLAs need to be be from all the contributors, not > just one person. > > Understood, that’s why I use plural form of ICLAs. > > I shall collected ICLAs/SGAs and send them t

Re: IP Clearance Process for Incubating projects

> Just to be clear the ICLAs need to be be from all the contributors, not just > one person. Understood, that’s why I use plural form of ICLAs. I shall collected ICLAs/SGAs and send them to the mailing list by the end of this weekend if everything is fine. But I’m confused about what I shall do

Re: IP Clearance Process for Incubating projects

Hi, > I think I shall get the ICLAs/SGA signed by the code owner and send the > result to d...@weex.apache.org , then I am > confused about what to do next. Just to be clear the ICLAs need to be be from all the contributors, not just one person. > I have also re

Re: IP Clearance Process for Incubating projects

This is not done yet. The code owner of a third-party tool [1] is willing to give the donation to ASF, and I’m happy to receive the donation. I think I shall get the ICLAs/SGA signed by the code owner and send the result to d...@weex.apache.org , then I am confused

Re: [Discuss] Graduate Apache SINGA (incubating) as a TLP

Hi, > All looks good to me, and I checked a lot :-) Well, tone clearer, except the software grant issue that is. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail

Re: [Discuss] Graduate Apache SINGA (incubating) as a TLP

Hi, All looks good to me, and I checked a lot :-) It’s nice to see a project who brand is well respected as an Apache project, that has grown it community and understands how to make releases. A couple of questions: - Can you give me an idea of the diversity (company wise) of the proposed PMC.

Re: IP Clearance Process for Incubating projects

Hi, > Suppose ICLAs / SGAs is already signed and send to a proper mailing list > (d...@weex.apache.org ), what should I do next ? IMO If that already been done, I don’t see any harm in using the standard process, if that’s the easy path. What's important is that the

Re: IP Clearance Process for Incubating projects

Thanks for your quick reply. I’m still a little confused about what I should do next. Suppose ICLAs / SGAs is already signed and send to a proper mailing list (d...@weex.apache.org ), what should I do next ? Is there any documentation for make a donation to a proje

Re: IP Clearance Process for Incubating projects

Hi, IMO there’s no need to go through the standard IP process but you still need to check the IP of the donation very carefully and make sure that you ICLA for all people who worked on it and/or a SGA if needed (depending on who owns the code’s copyright). It best if this is recorded on the ma

IP Clearance Process for Incubating projects

Hi, community. As a PPMC member of Apache Weex, I found some useful tools developed outside ASF code repo, and I’d like to make those tools donated to Weex PPMC. Is there any necessary to go through the standard IP clearance process considering the fact that Weex is currently in Apache Incubato

Re: [Discuss] Graduate Apache SINGA (incubating) as a TLP

Hi, > The PPMC reached a conclusion on the discussion [1] that there is no need > for SGA. The link referred to doesn't give a reason why one is not required. Why was it decided that it wasn’t needed? Even if it not required (which I’m not 100% sure that is the case), would it be difficult to g

Re: [Discuss] Graduate Apache SINGA (incubating) as a TLP

The PPMC reached a conclusion on the discussion [1] that there is no need for SGA. Please let me know if there is anything else required. Otherwise, we start the vote. Thank you, Moaz [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b8b2979a870784ce04f87572e0f44311a1338bc9365e955a80d5248b@1427941853@%3C