Re: [DISCUSS] Distribution guidelines for other platforms

2020-07-06 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Dave I'm a bit surprised at your -1 given this guidelines have been discussed before on several lists (including this one) and you’ve not had any objections that I can recall. What is your main concern here? Thanks, Justin --

[ANNOUNCE] Apache DataSketches Hive 1.1.0-incubating released!

2020-07-06 Thread leerho
### Bug Fix for DataSketches-hive Issue #50 ### Hello All, 1. The Apache DataSketches Hive 1.1.0-incubating has been released! NOTE 1: This is the Java Hive adaptor component of the DataSketches library that enables Apache Hive access to the key sketch algorithms in production-ready packages

Re: [DISCUSS] Distribution guidelines for other platforms

2020-07-06 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, > For clarity, you mean that the dependencies included in a binary fit valid > classes of licenses with correct notices. No, while that might also be the case, what I was saying is that a release must be voted on by the IPMC. >>> Would there be cases where the convenience binaries must be

Re: [VOTE] Distribution guidelines for platforms

2020-07-06 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, > This lacks proper reference to existing Apache Policies and instead rewrites > it. I think that this is outside the Incubator’s remit. How do you think it rewrites it? Nothing as far as I can see is added only clarified and put into context for different 3rd party platforms. Legal helped

Re: [VOTE] Distribution guidelines for platforms

2020-07-06 Thread Dave Fisher
-1 (binding) This lacks proper reference to existing Apache Policies and instead rewrites it. I think that this is outside the Incubator’s remit. Regards, Dave > On Jul 5, 2020, at 6:16 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > This vote is to make this official [1] and move the guidelines to the

Re: [DISCUSS] Distribution guidelines for other platforms

2020-07-06 Thread Dave Fisher
Hi - Big observation. I’m uncomfortable with the Incubator making Apache Policy beyond adding DISCLAIMERs. Other Board and Operations VPs have been delegated policy making. Yes, that is hard and unclear. Perhaps this proposal could inform those discussions. More inline. > On Jul 5, 2020, at 7

[VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.7.0-rc2

2020-07-06 Thread Mike Beckerle
The Apache Daffodil community has voted and approved the proposed release of Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.7.0-rc2. We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator release. Daffodil is an open source implementation of the DFDL specification that uses DFDL schema

[VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.7.0-rc2

2020-07-06 Thread Mike Beckerle
The Apache Daffodil community has voted and approved the proposed release of Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.0.0-rc1. We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator release. Daffodil is an open source implementation of the DFDL specification that uses DFDL schema

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TVM (incubating) v0.6.1.rc1

2020-07-06 Thread Furkan KAMACI
Hi, +1 from me (binding, carrying over my vote). I checked: - Incubating in name - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - Checked PGP signatures - Checked Checksums - Code compiles and tests successfully run Kind Regards, Furkan KAMACI On Sat, Jul 4, 202