Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TubeMQ (Incubating) 0.5.0-incubating RC0

Hi Justin, Before, we noticed the authorization difference between the versions of berkeleydb-je component, so we adjusted it from version 6.x.y to 7.3.x. Next, we will analyze again, if there is a problem, we will adjust the implementation and replace it. Luciano Resende 于2020年8月3日周一 下午2:10写道：

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TubeMQ (Incubating) 0.5.0-incubating RC0

+1 (binding), with similar comments as below from Justin. The LICENSE needs some cleanup, and probably a different license file for source and binary distribution. Built ok for me On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 3:15 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > +1 (binding) > > However if it wasn’t for the Incubat

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TubeMQ (Incubating) 0.5.0-incubating RC0

Hi, > We have paid attention to this issue, the berkeleydb-je as of version 7.3, JE > is licensed under the Apache 2.0 license: > https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17277_02/html/relnotes.html > Good to know. Sadly with some 3rd party software j

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TubeMQ (Incubating) 0.5.0-incubating RC0

Supplement: [image: image.png] [image: image.png] Goson zhang 于2020年8月3日周一 下午1:23写道： > Hi Justin, > > We have paid attention to this issue, the berkeleydb-je as of version 7.3, > JE is licensed under the Apache 2.0 license: > https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17277_02/html/relnotes.html > > Justin M

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TubeMQ (Incubating) 0.5.0-incubating RC0

Hi Justin, We have paid attention to this issue, the berkeleydb-je as of version 7.3, JE is licensed under the Apache 2.0 license: https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17277_02/html/relnotes.html Justin Mclean 于2020年8月3日周一 下午1:09写道： > Hi, > > > berkeleydb-je is a component that TubeMQ relies on to store

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TubeMQ (Incubating) 0.5.0-incubating RC0

Hi, > berkeleydb-je is a component that TubeMQ relies on to store metadata, it > needs to be downloaded from oracle and requires username and password > access. > For the convenience of everyone, we found this third-party repository ( > https://download.dcache .org/nexus/repository/berkeleydb-je/)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TubeMQ (Incubating) 0.5.0-incubating RC0

Hi Luciano, I used the method of clearing the local maven repository cache and recompiling for verification. berkeleydb-je is a component that TubeMQ relies on to store metadata, it needs to be downloaded from oracle and requires username and password access. For the convenience of everyone, we f

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TubeMQ (Incubating) 0.5.0-incubating RC0

+1 ( binding ) I checked the following. Agree with Justin, Please fix the LICENSE issues mentioned above. 1. Incubating in name. 2. PGP Signatures. 3. SHA512 Checksums. 4. DISCLAIMER-WIP exists. 5. LICENSE and NOTICE are fine. 6. No unexpected binary files. 7. Maven Build Passes on Mac envi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TubeMQ (Incubating) 0.5.0-incubating RC0

On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 7:47 PM Goson zhang wrote: > > > - For the failed to compile from source: > My partners and I cleaned up the maven repository and recompiled, it is > passable. > Could you please give more details on what was done on the above? -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lres

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Dubbo Getty project contribution

Hi, > I don’t agree. If Alex owns the copyright to the whole of the dubbogo > contribution then his assurance through his ICLA ought to be enough for the > ASF. IMO (legal hat on) Alex doesn’t own the copyright, each individual contributor does to the bits they contributed. Thanks, Justin ---

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Dubbo Getty project contribution

Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 2, 2020, at 7:25 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> Do we need to add all the committers in the IP clearance list of this page? > > Yes it would be good to list them all. I don’t agree. If Alex owns the copyright to the whole of the dubbogo contribution th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TubeMQ (Incubating) 0.5.0-incubating RC0

First of all, thanks to Justin and Ming! - For the issues of LICENSE and NOTICE: We have made a change to LICENSE since the last release, we will continue to modify it according to the Apache specification, and ensure that there is no problem before the next release. - For the failed to compile f

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Dubbo Getty project contribution

Hi, > Do we need to add all the committers in the IP clearance list of this page? Yes it would be good to list them all. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands,

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Dubbo Getty project contribution

> Do we have ICLAs for all committers? Yes, I think the project has had all committers signed ICLAs, Alex has confirmed this when voting in the dubbo community https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r46e30a742d5ced2daedbab3d45bd3bf8279c372d4fe1b5599dc8dd0f%40%3Cdev.dubbo.apache.org%3E Do we need

[ANNOUNCE] Apache PageSpeed 1.14.36.1 (incubating) released!

The Apache PageSpeed (incubating) community is pleased to announce its first release: 1.14.36.1. PageSpeed represents a series of open source technologies to help make the web faster by rewriting web pages to reduce latency and bandwidth. Artifacts from this release are available for download via

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.8-rc01

+1. (binding) Here are my checks, 1. Signature and Hashed are good. 2. Release commit and Tag are good. 3. LICENSE and NOTICE files are good for me. 4. I can build the binary from the Source release kit by going through the build readme. 5. DISCLAIMER-WIP is included. BTW, We need to remove the f

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TubeMQ (Incubating) 0.5.0-incubating RC0

+1 non-binding I checked: - incubating in name. - DISCLAIMER exists (WIP). - signature and hashes correct. - LICENSE is not good which contains a lot of dependencies that shouldn't be there. - All files have ASF headers, but some of files's ASF header contains html tag [1]. > - LICENSE incorrect

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TubeMQ (Incubating) 0.5.0-incubating RC0

Hi, +1 (binding) However if it wasn’t for the Incubating WIP disclaimer I would be -1. The LICENSE issues where brought up last time [1] It is best if some work is done to improve each release so it better than the last. Please ask your mentors to help with this. I checked: - incubating in na