Hi,
With no -1 votes being cast, I will consider this IP clearance vote as passed
by lazy consensus. I will ask the infra team to do the transfer now[1]
1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DUBBO-43
Jun
> On Jul 24, 2020, at 6:54 PM, Jun Liu wrote:
>
> Hi Incubator PMC,
>
> The Apache
Thanks Dave ^^
--
此致！Best Regards
陈明雨 Mingyu Chen
Email:
chenmin...@apache.org
在 2020-08-07 01:32:54，"Dave Fisher" 写道：
>Hi Mingyu Chen,
>
>Thanks for submitting the report. I’ve signed off.
>
>Regards,
>Dave
>
>> On Aug 6, 2020, at 6:41 AM, 陈明雨 wrote:
>>
>> Hi Justin:
>>
>>
>>
Hi,
EventMesh will no longer rely strongly on RocketMQ in the future, it is only
one choice of the storage layer, other MQs, redis, blockchain can be
supported in the future plans.
EventMesh is very different from Camel i think, it positioned in event
governance and mesh cloud nativeization.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17172716#comment-17172716
]
Henri Yandell commented on INCUBATOR-253:
-
Noting that the DJL project have updated their
Hi Mingyu Chen,
Thanks for submitting the report. I’ve signed off.
Regards,
Dave
> On Aug 6, 2020, at 6:41 AM, 陈明雨 wrote:
>
> Hi Justin:
>
>
> Sorry that Doris has just sent the report a few hours ago.
> Can we still catch up with this time?
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> 此致！Best Regards
> 陈明雨
What are the similarities and differences from Camel? (I'm not making
an argument in any way..just trying to understand it)
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 11:51 AM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> If you make it generic enough that runs on other messaging solutions
> (Kafka, Artemis, ActiveMQ, RocketMQ), you
Hi @Michael
Thanks for your advice. As far as I know, Solace doesn't have a product
called Eventmesh, They're just using that name to promote their PubSub
platform.
But in order not to cause trouble in the future, I also ask guys of Apache
Brand to help check whether this name is appropriate.
If you make it generic enough that runs on other messaging solutions
(Kafka, Artemis, ActiveMQ, RocketMQ), you have less risk of being
orphaned.
however if it's tight coupled with RocketMQ mentioned.. it becomes
more like a sub project of your broker than a separate project.
What are the plans?
Hi Justin,
NLPCraft will report next month.
Kind Regards,
Furkan KAMACI
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 4:41 PM 陈明雨 wrote:
> Hi Justin:
>
>
> Sorry that Doris has just sent the report a few hours ago.
> Can we still catch up with this time?
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> 此致！Best Regards
> 陈明雨 Mingyu Chen
>
> Email:
Hi Justin:
Sorry that Doris has just sent the report a few hours ago.
Can we still catch up with this time?
--
此致！Best Regards
陈明雨 Mingyu Chen
Email:
chenmin...@apache.org
在 2020-08-06 20:44:45，"Willem Jiang" 写道：
>Sorry for that, I will ping Doris PPMC for sending a report next
Eason Chen 于2020年8月6日周四 下午6:17写道：
> Hi,
>
>
> We do not deny that the community is not really big and active, we share
> our best practices and look forward to getting more people's attention and
> help, at the same time can help our colleagues.we believe that as
> long as we find the right
Sorry for that, I will ping Doris PPMC for sending a report next month.
Willem Jiang
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 3:43 PM Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> HI,
>
> > Looks like Doris will reimport next moth.
>
> Report next month even :-)
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
>
Hi,
We do not deny that the community is not really big and active, we share our
best practices and look forward to getting more people's attention and help, at
the same time can help our colleagues.we believe that as long as we find
the right method and organization such as the apache way,
There are now 10 contributors of this project, but seven of them started
the first commit in July.
That's a little strange.
Thanks,
Ming Wen, Apache APISIX & Apache SkyWalking
Twitter: _WenMing
Eason Chen 于2020年8月6日周四 下午5:44写道：
> Hi, wenming
> 1. I believe more people will join in the future
Hi, wenming
1. I believe more people will join in the future ;)
2. Sure
----
??:
"general"
Hi
Noticed this a little late.
I have some questions about the status of the project, especially about the
`Orphaned Products` and the activity of the community.
With a project open-sourced since September 2019, this doesn't seem like
the status you said in the proposal.
1. If the EventMesh
Hi, Eason,
It's an interesting project. And I have a few questions and
it would be great if you could help:
1. According to github's statistics[1], most of the code was contributed by
yourself.
So if you're on vacation, this project will not easy to move forward.
2. An external dependency
HI,
> Looks like Doris will reimport next moth.
Report next month even :-)
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Hi,
Looks like Doris will reimport next moth.
What do you think we should do about Warble? Either your an incubating project
with PPMC oversight or not, there isn’t really a consent of a dormant project.
Still missing and unless they are submitted ASAP they will be expected to
report next
Hi
Im PMC member from ActiveMQ project.
I like the idea, nice. +1 on it as a project idea.
I am though a little -1 on the name of the project, I would recommend that an
alternative name for the project is found as there maybe a conflict in rights
ability to copyright and trademark to it.
I’m
Hi,
+1, I'm also interesting by this project and I would be happy to help as
mentor if needed.
regards,
François
fpa...@apache.org
Le 04/08/2020 à 19:33, Kevin Ratnasekera a écrit :
> Hi Easen,
>
> +1, Having worked in a similar domain so far, I have to say this is an
> interesting project. If
I am sorry, I re-learned the information about the release, and there are
indeed some problems with this release.
1. The binary package is indeed required in svn.
2. The license and notice files in the release-docs directory are not required
in the source tar, because the source tar does not
22 matches
Mail list logo
