Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (incubating) 0.7.1

2020-11-01 Thread Furkan KAMACI
Hi, +1 (binding, carrying over my vote). Kind Regards, Furkan KAMACI On 2 Nov 2020 Mon at 00:24 Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > +1 [binding], vote carry over from [1] > > -- > Cos > > [1] > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r333cd17f76303c86b603aa80ce7faa96b443c0351d680b22081a9d64%40%3Cdev.nl

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (incubating) 0.7.1

2020-11-01 Thread Konstantin Boudnik
+1 [binding], vote carry over from [1] -- Cos [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r333cd17f76303c86b603aa80ce7faa96b443c0351d680b22081a9d64%40%3Cdev.nlpcraft.apache.org%3E On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 10:55PM, Aaron Radzinski wrote: > Hello all, > This is a call for a vote to release Apache N

Re: Alita-validator Proposal

2020-11-01 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi At Apache we have bval which is a bean validation implementation. Contrarly to what was written, bean validation does not work by exception but validator returns violations as alita if I got it right. So overall I am not sure the difference between both except some API choices. Also note that o

Re: Alita-validator Proposal

2020-11-01 Thread Sheng Wu
Hi Ran Ke I did a quick review of the project you proposed, due to it is in Chinese basically, very few IPMC members could understand the project from the read doc. I need to point out 1. The project has a very small community, you are the only one committed codes. The other two, you listed on the

Alita-validator Proposal

2020-11-01 Thread ranke
Alita-validator Proposal Abstract Alita-validator is a simple and easy-to-use API verifier. It provides custom business code and business message and returns it to API consumers. Users can customize error return packaging. Users can extend some non generic business related verifiers themselves.