Hello Incubator Community,
This is a call for a vote to release Apache TubeMQ (Incubating) version
0.8.0-incubating RC2
The Apache TubeMQ community has voted on and approved a proposal to
release
Apache TubeMQ (Incubating) version 0.8.0-incubating RC2
We now kindly request
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- Incubating in name
- Checksums and PGP signatures are valid
- DISCLAIMER-WIP exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE look OK
Thanks,
Ming Wen, Apache APISIX PMC Chair
Twitter: _WenMing
Jia Yu 于2021年2月4日周四 上午11:47写道：
> Dear all,
>
> We need to collect more votes in order to get
Thanks a lot everyone for providing your votes.
*RESULTS:*
The Ratis TLP vote has passed with 9 binding +1s and 18 non-binding +1s (
and there are no vetoes)
Congratulations everyone in the Ratis Community for these results and will
notify the board soon.
Regards,
Uma
On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at
Dear all,
We need to collect more votes in order to get this approved. Please take a
look at our release when you have time.
Thank you very much!
Jia
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 1:00 PM Felix Cheung wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Carry from dev@
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 10:02 PM Jia Yu wrote:
>
The delays at Travis were primarily due to a few things:
- Limited capacity and high demand
- Abuse of the free service by cryptocurrency miners
The problem of the crypto miners has been pretty much resolved, but 1 would
still be an issue on Travis if there hadn't been a mass exit to GHA last
Hi Greg
Agreed. No assumption has been made.
I was just hoping that GitHub can hold it up. Just in case the delays come
back again, the Apache community can look for a solution together.
Asking for help from Microsoft is just one possible option.
Weiwei
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 2:40 AM Greg
Hi All,
We would like to have a third round of vote for the first release of
Apache Liminal (Incubating), after fixing the issues identified at the
previous round.
This release enables seamless Liminal installation in Local mode and
in AWS cloud to execute machine-learning pipelines.
Liminal
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021, 01:36 Weiwei Yang wrote:
>...
> we can communicate with Microsoft about giving the Apache
> repo some extra resources.
> I guess it won't be a big problem to such a wealthy company
>
Their wealth does not mean they can give us anything we want. That is a
fallacy. Their
