Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache AGE Incubating as a Top Level Project

2021-12-17 Thread Juan Pan
Hello, This is Trista, one of the AGE mentors from July this year. I didn't join this community from day one but like to share something about it. After joining, Andrew, one committer of the community, contacted me that they wanted to have a meeting with me to talk about the community's

Re: [Help] How to check the website check

2021-12-17 Thread Calvin Kirs
Hi, mingyu: You can refer to this Apache project website branding policy [1] [1]https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#attributions 陈明雨 于2021年12月18日周六 10:43写道: > Dear IPMC: > > > This is from Doris community. And this is our website[1] > I noticed that our website didn't pass the website

[Help] How to check the website check

2021-12-17 Thread 陈明雨
Dear IPMC: This is from Doris community. And this is our website[1] I noticed that our website didn't pass the website check here[2]. But I don't know how to fix it. For example, the check says the Disclaimer is missing(or wrong format). But we do have a Disclaimer at the bottom of the

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache AGE Incubating as a Top Level Project

2021-12-17 Thread Andrew Ko
> IMO - You are setting the committer bar too high. If the contributor has some expertise that’s good. Remember you want this project to survive for a long time. If you set it too high then people will lose interest. First of all, I didn't know non-code contributors can also become a committer.

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache AGE Incubating as a Top Level Project

2021-12-17 Thread Josh Innis
> Non-code contributors are also candidates to be committers. They can do the > many non-code activities. > > That is how I was able to join my first PMC over 13 years ago. Answering > questions. Personally I thought code contributions were mandatory to be considered as being added to the

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache AGE Incubating as a Top Level Project

2021-12-17 Thread Dave Fisher
> On Dec 17, 2021, at 3:07 PM, Andrew Ko wrote: > > Hello John, > > The number 68 includes > > - > > 28 code contributors who submitted pull requests that were merged. > - > > 40+ who identified bugs, influenced the project with strong and informed > opinion, answered AGE users’

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache AGE Incubating as a Top Level Project

2021-12-17 Thread Dave Fisher
> On Dec 17, 2021, at 3:11 PM, Josh Innis wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > Regarding (3), Dehowe Feng was added to the PPMC on 12/6/2021 [1]. Oh I see, but he is a BitNine employee. Add increases the concern that AGE is not a diverse community. > > Regarding (4), all the files involved in the

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache AGE Incubating as a Top Level Project

2021-12-17 Thread Josh Innis
Hi Dave, Regarding (3), Dehowe Feng was added to the PPMC on 12/6/2021 [1]. Regarding (4), all the files involved in the issue we had in the last release have the correct headers. The open pull request is not about the original license issue. Since the previous release, a Python and Go driver

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache AGE Incubating as a Top Level Project

2021-12-17 Thread Andrew Ko
Hello John, The number 68 includes - 28 code contributors who submitted pull requests that were merged. - 40+ who identified bugs, influenced the project with strong and informed opinion, answered AGE users’ questions, helped with code snippets to clarify how to use AGE.

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache AGE Incubating as a Top Level Project

2021-12-17 Thread Dave Fisher
Four more concerns: (1) Three of the PPMC members are not subscribed to the private mailing list. (2) Four of the Committers including some of the PPMC members have not mapped their apache id to their GitHub id. How can they contribute? (3) No one has been added to the PPMC. (4) Are all of