I don't see license issues here but a process issue. What license issues do
you spot?
Best,
tison.
Huajie Wang 于2023年2月5日周日 11:29写道：
> Hello Incubator Community,
>
> I'm cancelling this vote:
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/680qq5jggwbqxmwfq5yztp4tzmz4l2ys
>
> due to licenses issues. I'll
BTW, RCs don't need a branch but a tag, although this is a practice instead
of requirement :)
Best,
tison.
tison 于2023年2月5日周日 11:57写道：
> I suggest you create a release-2.0 branch and make only release related
> changes so that the artifacts get converged during RCs.
>
> Currently, I see that
I suggest you create a release-2.0 branch and make only release related
changes so that the artifacts get converged during RCs.
Currently, I see that you create RC always from the dev branch and thus
includes unexpected changes. This approach introduces extra exceptions and
only slows the
Hello Incubator Community,
I'm cancelling this vote:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/680qq5jggwbqxmwfq5yztp4tzmz4l2ys
due to licenses issues. I'll fix them and start a new vote process.
Thanks a lot for all your help.
Best,
Huajie Wang
hi Willem:
Thanks for your review and feedback, this vote is closed, We will fix these
issues and start a new vote process.
Best,
Huajie Wang
Willem Jiang 于2023年2月5日周日 11:16写道：
> -1, we need to start a new vote with the tag of rc5.
> I just found out that the rc4 tag[1] was created on Feb
-1, we need to start a new vote with the tag of rc5.
I just found out that the rc4 tag[1] was created on Feb 3th, it has
some new changes[2] after the vote in the stream park dev on Feb 1st.
Please keep in mind, if we made some changes on the voting release
kit, we need to start a new vote,
Hello Incubator Community:
This is a call for a vote to release Apache StreamPark(Incubating)
version 2.0.0-RC4
The Apache StreamPark community has voted on and approved a proposal to
release
Apache StreamPark(Incubating) version 2.0.0-RC4
We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review
