The LICENSE file communicates the licensing of all content in an
Apache product distribution.
It always contains the text of the Apache License and sometimes more
information.[1]
NOTICE file is used for required third-party notices [2]。
If we do the source release， we only include the bundled third
>These License information should be put into the License file.
Any requirement for this statement?
In ASF projects I involve, I always put dependencies info in the NOTICE
file and leave the LICENSE file AS IS from
https://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt.
Best,
tison.
Willem Jiang 于2023年5
I checked the NOTICE file, it includs the third-party dependencies
license information.
These License information should be put into the License file.
Some third-party dependency Licenses are Apache or MIT, we can choose
Apache License by default.
I cannot find how to build from the README.md fil
+1(binding)
[x] Download links are valid.
[x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
[x] LICENSE files exist.
[x] NOTICE is included. (checked included dependencies, years etc.).
[x] DISCLAIMER is included.
[x] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[x] All source
+1(non-binding)
Checked:
- Download links are valid.
- Checksums and signatures.
- LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
- All source files have ASF headers
- Compile from source on macOS Monterey
On 2023/05/15 09:51:43 Jingsong Li wrote:
> Hello Incubator PMC,
>
> The Apache Paimon community has voted and
