The phrase Apache License with exception … is meaningless the ASF does not
allow it under trademarks. Please email tradema...@apache.org for any
clarification.
If it’s not the Apache License then you can’t call it the Apache License + - or
whatever.
Best,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct
> Then can i dual license under apache 2.0 and apache 2.0 with llvm
> exception or that is also a no go?
As mentioned under https://www.apache.org/licenses/
All software produced by The Apache Software Foundation or any of its projects
or subjects is licensed according to the terms of the
On 2023/10/24 02:20:27 Xuanwo wrote:
> Oh, sorry for misreading your mail.
>
> "The Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions" is acceptable as a
dependency. However, all incubator projects are required to use the
Apache License v2.0 without exceptions.
>
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2023, at 09:57,
Oh, sorry for misreading your mail.
"The Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions" is acceptable as a dependency.
However, all incubator projects are required to use the Apache License v2.0
without exceptions.
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023, at 09:57, Ivan I wrote:
> If my project uses “Apache License
AFAIK, Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions is allowed to be used in ASF
projects (including incubator projects). The exception allows for more flexible
code reuse in specific scenarios, particularly those related to static linking.
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023, at 09:57, Ivan I wrote:
> If my
If my project uses “Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions”
LLVM Exceptions being:
LLVM Exceptions to the Apache 2.0 License
As an exception, if, as a result of your compiling your source code,
portions
of this Software are embedded into an Object form of such source code, you
may
Dear Christian
Excellent. Thank you so much.
Having a call over Zoom or Slack would be great to meet. I will have the
core people on our end to join as well. Please let me know when would be a
good time to meet.
No particular questions besides what you would like us to prepare and
provide at
Hello Mohammad,
funny you ask right now, because I just updated some files before you sent your
message.
Your mentors, including me, will set up the project files. I added yours to the
repo.
You are visible here already (on the bottom):
https://incubator.apache.org/
but the link doesn't work.
Dear all,
What would be our next step after the VOTE Result message?
Our team is on standby to get the Podling procedure started.
---
Best Regards,
Mohammad Sadoghi, PhD
Associate Professor
Exploratory Systems Lab (ExpoLab)
Department of Computer Science
University of California, Davis
The vote passes with 4 bindig +1s.
Vote Thread
https://lists.apache.org/thread/nzz9pkozc833j8qf1z6xbk80j7v6vx29
Votes
Ryan Skraba
Ayush Saxena
Matthew de Detrich
PJ Fanning
I will proceed with finalising the release and make the announcements.
Thanks to everyone involved in the development and
+1 (Binding)
[X] Download links are valid.
[X] Checksums and signatures.
[X] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
[X] No unexpected binary files
[X] Source files have ASF headers
[X] Can compile from source
I built, ran unit tests from the tar, and tested the Maven and Gradle plugins
using the method
+1 (non-binding), good luck.
Kent
Eason Chen 于2023年10月23日周一 14:21写道:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Good luck!
>
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 11:24 AM Xin Wang wrote:
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Good luck!
> >
> > Xin Wang
> >
> > Jialin Qiao 于2023年10月23日周一 09:42写道:
> >
> > > +1, Good luck!
> > >
+1 (Binding)
* Built from source
* Validated Checksums
* Validated Signatures
* Validated Disclaimer file exists.
* Validated LICENSE & NOTICE file exists
* Validated no code diff b/w git tag & src tar
Thanx PJ Fanning for driving the release, Good Luck!!!
-Ayush
On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 at 18:40,
Hi everyone,
This vote has been open for a while but we still don't have enough votes to
proceed. Would any of the Pekko mentors or Incubator PMC members generally have
time to review this RC?
We also have another vote open for Pekko Projection 1.0.0-RC1.
The Incubator community's help is
+1 (non-binding)
Good luck!
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 11:24 AM Xin Wang wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Good luck!
>
> Xin Wang
>
> Jialin Qiao 于2023年10月23日周一 09:42写道:
>
> > +1, Good luck!
> > —
> > Jialin Qiao
> > Apache IoTDB PMC
> >
> > Huxing Zhang 于2023年10月23日周一 09:39写道:
>
15 matches
Mail list logo