Re: Moving existing incubating project websites to the new incubator url

2003-11-25 Thread B. W. Fitzpatrick
Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Since AltRMI and FTPServer are in the "old" URL, what about moving them > like this? No need to rush, it can be easily done in the next site update. > > http://incubator.apache.org/projects/altrmi >| >v >

Re: Generated sites

2003-11-24 Thread B. W. Fitzpatrick
Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 23:39, B. W. Fitzpatrick wrote: > > > > Or if it is an absolute requirement that we have the boxes then why > > > doesn't each member pitch in a 100 bucks and we'll buy some machines > &g

Re: Generated sites

2003-11-24 Thread B. W. Fitzpatrick
Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 19:51, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > > Cc'ing Stefano. I believe that part of it is happening in lenya land, but > > it terms of a build server, obviously it will need to be build tool agnosti > c > > so that maven, anakia, and other

Re: cvs commit: incubator/site whoweare.cwiki

2003-11-13 Thread B. W. Fitzpatrick
Umm, what are you doing and why? -Fitz, completely confused [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > nicolaken2003/11/13 08:52:39 > > Modified:site whoweare.cwiki > Log: > Switching B. W. Fitzpatrick to inactive. > > Revision ChangesPath > 1.5 +

Re: AW: We want to donate a XML / Cocoon / EJB / WebStart - based CMS

2003-08-28 Thread B. W. Fitzpatrick
"Sascha-Matthias Kulawik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > One initial issue is JBoss, as it's LGPL. Apache projects can > > use only > > Apache-compatible licenced libraries, and (L)GPL is not one of them. > > Apache now is making Apache Geronimo now though, so that > > could be taken > >

Re: [VOTE] Policy for incubating project resources (was Re: xmlbeans project )

2003-07-25 Thread B. W. Fitzpatrick
Aaron Bannert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Thursday, July 24, 2003, at 07:23 AM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > > > IMHO it depends on what the incubator PMC does. If they *do* create > > the > > lists and the such then maybe they should set policy (meaning telling > > other > > people what

Re: [vote] XMLBeans to enter XML incubation [was: Re: Vote for XMLBeans proposal in the XML Project (was RE: Vote for XMLBeans proposal)]

2003-07-08 Thread B. W. Fitzpatrick
Steven Noels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Dear committers, > > as outlined in the xml.apache.org charter (section 6.2), and in > collaboration with the Incubator > (http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/incubator/STATUS?rev=HEAD) > > Subject to: > > - relicensing of the XMLBeans codebase using

Re: cvs commit: incubator-site/build/site/projects/altrmi/api/org/apache/altrmi/server/impl/socket AbstractCompleteSocketStreamServer.html AbstractPartialSocketStreamServer.html CompleteSocketCustomStreamPipedBinder.html CompleteSocketCustomStreamPipedConnection.html CompleteSocketCustomStreamServer.html

2003-03-19 Thread B. W. Fitzpatrick
Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > > > I agree that putting generated stuff in CVS sucks big time. > > The point is that users and developers like having these on the site. > > > > For example, I might need the docs but have only the jar ATM, or I w

Re: cvs commit: incubator-site/build/site/projects/altrmi/api/org/apache/altrmi/server/impl/socket AbstractCompleteSocketStreamServer.html AbstractPartialSocketStreamServer.html CompleteSocketCustomStreamPipedBinder.html CompleteSocketCustomStreamPipedConnection.html CompleteSocketCustomStreamServer.html

2003-03-17 Thread B. W. Fitzpatrick
Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > B. W. Fitzpatrick wrote: > > > > First, is there a good reason to have these generated javadoc/jars in CVS > > if someone can build them? > > one good reason to have them in cvs is in case they > need

Re: cvs commit: incubator-site/build/site/projects/altrmi/api/org/apache/altrmi/server/impl/socket AbstractCompleteSocketStreamServer.html AbstractPartialSocketStreamServer.html CompleteSocketCustomStreamPipedBinder.html CompleteSocketCustomStreamPipedConnection.html CompleteSocketCustomStreamServer.html

2003-03-17 Thread B. W. Fitzpatrick
Paul Hammant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Aaron Bannert wrote: > > > Sorry to be a nag, but are these all just autogenerated from > > javadoc? Surely javadoc output need not be in CVS. > > > > -aaron > > Stricktly speaking, there is no need at all for a xxx-site CVS module > for any Apache pro

Re: Updated Tapestry code audit

2003-03-12 Thread B. W. Fitzpatrick
"Howard M. Lewis Ship" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Does anybody know what license DocBook and DocBook XSL is released > under? I couldn't find it. It's in the README inside of the xsl tarball: 8-<---cut-here-8-<--- Copyright -

Re: Insigificant typos

2003-02-02 Thread B. W. Fitzpatrick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (O'brien, Tim) writes: > > Could you check out the incubator-site module from cvs > > and send in your fixes in patch format? > > Here's the patch. Thanks Tim. Applied. Can someone with the proper setup re-gen the site? RoUS? -Fitz -- Brian W. Fitzpatrick<[EMAIL PROTE

Re: Insigificant typos

2003-02-02 Thread B. W. Fitzpatrick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (O'brien, Tim) writes: > Found a few small typos on the incubator site: > > http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?ApacheIncubatorProjectPages/Err > ata > > Nothing major, I'm just a nit picking proofreader. Cool. Could you check out the incubator-site module from cvs