The Apache Bean Validation [1] community is proud to announce our
0.3-incubating release, which is our third release as an Apache
Incubator project. This release includes a few minor bug fixes and
passes the Bean Validation 1.0.3 TCK. Please visit the Downloads [2],
Documentation [3] and Samples
, Donald Woods wrote:
This is the third release of Apache Bean Validation.
We have already received 4 binding IPMC votes during the PPMC voting
below, so I'm requesting a 72 hour lazy consensus before releasing the
artifacts.
Thanks,
Donald
Original Message
Subject
Validation 0.3-incubating
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2011 07:35:44 -0400
From: Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org
Reply-To: bval-...@incubator.apache.org
To: bval-...@incubator.apache.org, priv...@incubator.apache.org
Vote passed with the following:
+1 Donald Woods, Mark Struberg, Kevan Miller, Niall
The Apache Bean Validation community is proud to announce our
0.2-incubating release, which is our second release as an Apache
Incubator project.
This release includes a few minor bug fixes and passes the Bean
Validation 1.0.3 TCK.
Please visit our project website to learn more about Apache Bean
The vote passes with the following four binding +1 IPMC votes :
Donald Woods, Kevan Miller, Ant Elder, Mark Struberg
and the following four non-binding PPMC +1 votes:
Carlos Vara, Simone Tripodi, Gerhard Petracek, Jeremy Bauer
There were no 0 or -1 votes.
Thanks,
Donald
On 8/13/10 1:38
Sorry for the lateness, but our BVAL report for August has been posted
to the Incubator wiki.
Apache Bean Validation will deliver an implementation of the JSR303 Bean
Validation 1.0 specification. BVAL entered incubation on March 1, 2010.
A list of the three most important issues to address in
On 8/11/10 5:29 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wed, August 11, 2010 5:19:03 PM
Subject: Re: an experiment
On 8/11/10 1:45 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
So. Following some advice given to me
On 8/11/10 5:30 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
On 08/11/2010 05:19 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
On 8/11/10 1:45 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
So. Following some advice given to me by Sam Ruby,
I'd like to start experimenting with different organizational
and procedural approaches to the projects I
I'd be willing to help out with a RAT TLP. We're using it in our normal
build process for OpenJPA, Geronimo and Bean Validation, so helping out
on future votes is the least I can do.
-Donald
On 8/12/10 5:52 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Greg Stein
A Bean Validation 0.2-incubating release candidate #2 has been created
with the following artifacts up for a vote:
SVN source tag (r985290):
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/tags/0.2-incubating/
Maven staging repo:
.
-Donald
On 8/13/10 1:38 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
A Bean Validation 0.2-incubating release candidate #2 has been created
with the following artifacts up for a vote:
SVN source tag (r985290):
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/tags/0.2-incubating/
Maven staging repo:
https
On 8/11/10 1:45 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
So. Following some advice given to me by Sam Ruby,
I'd like to start experimenting with different organizational
and procedural approaches to the projects I participate in
here. What I want to do is to see how far I can push
the envelope on the
Canceling this vote and will spin another one.
-Donald
On 8/5/10 2:59 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
A Bean Validation 0.2-incubating release candidate #1 has been created
with the following artifacts up for a vote:
SVN source tag (r982684):
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/tags
distribution contains a DEPENDENCIES file (which is not in SVN). If I
remove the DEPENDENCIES file, the build succeeds.
Signature/checksums, source, and general snooping -- all look good. So, once
the build problem was fixed, I'd be +1.
--kevan
On Aug 5, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Donald Woods
A Bean Validation 0.2-incubating release candidate #1 has been created
with the following artifacts up for a vote:
SVN source tag (r982684):
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/tags/0.2-incubating/
Maven staging repo:
+1 (binding)
jars include License/Notice/Disclaimer and are signed
passed incontainer TCK tests against JBoss 5.1.0.GA w/ 1.6.0_20
source passed apache-rat:check and built from tag
-Donald
On 8/5/10 2:59 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
A Bean Validation 0.2-incubating release candidate #1 has been
+1 (binding)
Was able to build from the tag, RAT output looked OK and jars had the
required License/Notice/Disclaimer files.
-Donald
On 6/29/10 4:04 PM, Jesse A Ramos wrote:
Hello,
Wink 1.1.1 release voting has completed successfully on the wink-dev list.
I'm now calling the IPMC vote to
/Nuvem
We ask the Incubator PMC to sponsor the project with Luciano Resende
as the Champion and Jean-Frederic Clere, Paul Fremantle, Ant Elder and
Donald Woods volunteering to be mentors.
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1, bring Nuvem into Incubator
[ ] +0, I don't care either way
[ ] -1
Hi Luciano, I'd be happy to help mentor the project.
I'd also like to be a committer, but it'd be more of a part-time
activity right now, but I'm very interested in helping.
-Donald
On 6/15/10 2:16 AM, Luciano Resende wrote:
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Luciano Resende
/BeanValidation/documentation.html
[5] https://cwiki.apache.org/BeanValidation/samples.html
Thanks,
Donald Woods
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h
and
Donald Woods
Thanks,
Donald
On 6/7/10 2:57 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
This is the first incubator release for Apache Bean Validation, with the
artifacts being versioned as 0.1-incubating.
We are requesting a lazy consensus vote, as we have already received 5
binding IPMC +1 votes during
This is the first incubator release for Apache Bean Validation, with the
artifacts being versioned as 0.1-incubating.
We are requesting a lazy consensus vote, as we have already received 5
binding IPMC +1 votes during the release voting on bval-dev -
(elected)
Donald Woods
On 5/18/10 7:25 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Hello,
During the past month, the Incubator has added a fair number of new PMC
Members:
Christian Grobmeier (elected)
does it mean i have been added to the IPMC and can now join Zeta as mentor?
I am asking because I
+1 (binding)
-Donald
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
INFRA-2702 is complete.
-Donald
On 5/18/10 2:46 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 05/17/2010 11:59 PM, Pid wrote:
On 17/05/2010 22:55, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
FYI I just fixed the report - the beginning of Clerezza
report had been mistakenly deleted in revision 19.
Thanks. Apparently, the
+1
Donald
On 5/12/10 8:45 PM, David Lutterkort wrote:
Hi all,
after the discussion so far [1], I'd like to put Detlacloud for a vote
for acceptance into the Apache Incubator according to the proposal[2]
I _think_ I've added everybody who expressed interest in being a mentor
or initial
[X] +1 Accept Whirr for incubation
-Donald
On 5/5/10 2:06 PM, Tom White wrote:
We've added three mentors since starting the proposal thread, so I
would like to start the vote to accept Whirr into the Apache
Incubator.
The proposal is included below and is also at:
And the Bean Validation podling would be interested in it, too!
-Donald
On 4/15/10 10:34 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Martijn, great suggestion! I have a couple podlings, OODT and SIS, that I am
participating in, that I know would be interested!
Cheers,
Chris
On 4/15/10 7:27
I've uploaded the incoming agimatec-validation source contribution to my
home directory on people -
/home/dwoods/agimatec-validation-0.9.6-src.tar.gz
-Donald
On 3/1/10 10:20 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
The vote passes with the following +1 votes:
Craig Russell, Alan Cabrera, Luciano Resende
, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Feb 23, 2010, at 4:03 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:51:35 -0500
Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org wrote:
I'm open to suggestions BeanValidation, OpenValidation, Validera, ...
Any of those work for me, though OpenValidation has a hint of the
same problem
or mentor, count me in !!
-M
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org wrote:
We're leaving the TLP/sub-project decision till graduation...
-Donald
On 2/23/10 5:36 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
As I understand it from the proposal, they intend to be Apache Commons
Validation
to the proposal for history.
Thanks,
Donald Woods
On 2/23/10 10:57 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Given the lack of response on the proposal and the push from our
champion to get moving :-), I'll assume lazy consensus and call a vote.
I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be
sponsored
, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Feb 23, 2010, at 4:03 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:51:35 -0500
Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org wrote:
I'm open to suggestions BeanValidation, OpenValidation, Validera, ...
Any of those work for me, though OpenValidation has a hint of the
same
No problem. I've updated the Required Resources and Sponsoring Entity
sections and will start the vote on another thread. Thanks.
-Donald
On 2/23/10 10:00 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jan 19, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Thanks. I'll get with Kevan to update the proposal
[] -1 object and reason why.
Thanks,
Donald Woods
Proposal text from the wiki
Validation
Abstract
The Validation project will deliver an implementation of the Bean
Validation Specification (JSR303)
Proposal
The initial Validation codebase will use the Agimatec Validation source
I'm open to suggestions BeanValidation, OpenValidation, Validera, ...
-Donald
On 2/23/10 12:27 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 02/23/2010 06:19 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:57:33 -0500
Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org wrote:
Given the lack of response on the proposal
We're leaving the TLP/sub-project decision till graduation...
-Donald
On 2/23/10 5:36 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
As I understand it from the proposal, they intend to be Apache Commons
Validation.
On 24/02/2010, at 4:19 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:57:33 -0500
Donald Woods
Good points, which we discussed some on the d...@commns list before
asking the Commons PMC to sponsor this as an Incubator project.
My concerns, were around brining in a new codebase that previously had
one maintainer, but not offering them committership from the beginning,
which seemed to
Hello everyone,
I would like to present an incubator proposal for a new Validation
podling, which would be a JSR-303 Bean Validation follow-on to the
existing Apache Commons Validation 1.x project, but based on a new
incoming codebase with a software grant from Agimatec GmbH.
The proposal
Jay points out an important design feature, in that if you write to the
JPA 1.0 or 2.0 spec API and don't use any provider specific extensions
or behaviors, then you can easily allow your users to choose a different
provider (based on performance, familiarity, ...) or depend upon the one
+1
Donald
Jeremy Hughes wrote:
The Aries proposal thread has now gone quiet and we would like to call
a vote to accept Aries into the Incubator. There has been some good
discussion with a few changes to the proposal including the addition
of initial committers, increasing the diversity of
Since there have been several edits, can you repost the latest proposal?
Also, I'm looking forward to contribute and to help integrate any
changes needed to support OpenJPA for RFC 143.
Thanks,
Donald
Jeremy Hughes wrote:
2009/9/2 Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com:
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at
42 matches
Mail list logo
