Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Marmotta as TLP

2013-11-04 Thread Fabian Christ
Board of Directors as the chair >of the Apache Marmotta Project, and to have primary responsibility >for management of the projects within the scope of >responsibility of the Apache Marmotta Project; and be it further > >RESOLVED, that the persons list

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Marmotta 3.1.0-incubating

2013-10-04 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi, while the release artifacts look good to me, I had no luck with compiling the sources. I first tried with Java 1.6 and was informed that I would need Java 1.7. So I tried with 1.7 but now I am getting failures in some tests, namely in the Kiwi triplestore reasoner. I made a few trials, cleaned

Re: binary release artifacts

2013-09-25 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi Luciano, 2013/9/24 Luciano Resende : > Is there any written policy that states that ? I have never heard that the > ASF can't have binary artifacts as official releases ? It's because "Apache releases open source and ONLY open source." [1] to quote Roy. [1] http://markmail.org/message/yzetzkh

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Marmotta 3.0.0-incubating (RC8)

2013-04-24 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi, apparently my first release vote did not made to the general list. Therefore, I will resent my original mail from April 17th, 2013 using my a.o. address. -- Original mail Hi, checked signature and digest of ./apache-marmotta-3.0.0-incubating-ldpath.zip gpg: GOOD sha1 : GOOD (3dab792c935bf

Re: LICENSE/NOTICE revisited (was Release Apache Marmotta 3.0.0-incubating (RC8))

2013-04-24 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi, and thanks Marvin for all the valuable information. This is really helpful! 2013/4/24 Marvin Humphrey : > We'll probably > need to open an individual LEGAL Jira issues for each license, e.g. > > Does bundling a dependency under the Python Software Foundation license > require any addi

Re: [VOTE] - Apache Clerezza Graduation Resolution

2013-01-18 Thread Fabian Christ
+1 2013/1/18 Bertrand Delacretaz : > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Tommaso Teofili > wrote: >>...I'm opening the vote >> for the below Apache Clerezza TLP graduation resolution... > > +1 > > -Bertrand (Clerezza mentor) > > -

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kalumet 0.6-incubating release (2nd try)

2013-01-10 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi, to verify the release: - What is the source release artifact that we are voting on? What is its checksum? - Where can I find the KEYS used to sign the release? - Is there a RAT report or similar available to see that all files have the appropriate license headers and were checked? Best, - F

Re: Clean up users who are members of the "incubator" group and no other?

2013-01-10 Thread Fabian Christ
2013/1/10 Bertrand Delacretaz > ... people listed at > http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html with just "incubator" in > the SVN projects field ... > Just wondering what is the use case for people having no entry in SVN projects field? Maybe some of these fall in the same category as peop

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Onami parent 1-incubating

2012-12-19 Thread Fabian Christ
> > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Christian Grobmeier > wrote: > > Hi Fabian, > > > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Fabian Christ > > wrote: > >> just had a look and I can only find the pom.xml file in Nexus. Is there > a > >> source r

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Onami parent 1-incubating

2012-12-19 Thread Fabian Christ
2012/12/19 Christian Grobmeier > Disclaimer and License is available in the source tag: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/onami/tags/parent-1-incubating/ > > I do not see a chance to put these files to Nexus. Or do you have an idea? > The problem is that we do not vote on SVN tags. We

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Onami parent 1-incubating

2012-12-19 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi, just had a look and I can only find the pom.xml file in Nexus. Is there a source release ZIP somewhere? The problem is that with the POM only, the DISCLAIMER is missing and there is no LICENSE file attached. IIRC all Apache incubating releases should contain such files. You need to create a re

Re: [VOTE] Accept Marmotta into the incubator

2012-11-29 Thread Fabian Christ
t; http://lmf.googlecode.com > > > > == Source and Intellectual Property Submission Plan > > > > Salzburg Research Forschungsgesellschaft mbH is the sole copyright owner > > of the initial code to be contributed, so should not be any problem with > > the standard IP cl

Re: How to handle non-OS jars in repository

2012-10-01 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi, just wanted to add what I have learned during Stanbol incubation: The ASF releases source code, only. The repo should contain only the sources - and no binary code (JARs) at all. This is fundamental to the idea of open source. Once you start hosting binaries the users can not be sure what the

[RESULT] Stanbol to graduate from the incubator

2012-09-10 Thread Fabian Christ
* Cihan Cimen * Concetto Bonafede * Enrico Daga * Fabian Christ * Florent André * Olivier Grisel * Ozgur Kilic

Re: [VOTE] Stanbol to graduate from the incubator

2012-09-06 Thread Fabian Christ
* Enrico Daga * Fabian Christ * Florent André * Olivier Grisel * Ozgur Kilic * Reto Bachmann-Gmür * Rupert Westenthaler

[VOTE] Stanbol to graduate from the incubator

2012-09-05 Thread Fabian Christ
* Bertrand Delacretaz * Cihan Cimen * Concetto Bonafede * Enrico Daga * Fabian Christ * Florent André * Olivier Grisel * Ozgur Kilic

[jira] [Closed] (PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8) Establish whether "Apache Stanbol" is a suitable name

2012-08-03 Thread Fabian Christ (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Fabian Christ closed PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8. - Resolution: Fixed We found consensus that Stanbol is a fine name for a

[jira] [Commented] (PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8) Establish whether "Apache Stanbol" is a suitable name

2012-07-17 Thread Fabian Christ (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13415979#comment-13415979 ] Fabian Christ commented on PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8: --- Trademark Q

[jira] [Commented] (PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8) Establish whether "Apache Stanbol" is a suitable name

2012-07-17 Thread Fabian Christ (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13415975#comment-13415975 ] Fabian Christ commented on PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8: --- Trademarks se

[jira] [Commented] (PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8) Establish whether "Apache Stanbol" is a suitable name

2012-07-11 Thread Fabian Christ (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13411876#comment-13411876 ] Fabian Christ commented on PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8: --- Go

[jira] [Created] (PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8) Establish whether "Apache Stanbol" is a suitable name

2012-07-11 Thread Fabian Christ (JIRA)
Fabian Christ created PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8: - Summary: Establish whether "Apache Stanbol" is a suitable name Key: PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNA

Re: [VOTE] Apache Stanbol Entityhub 0.10.0-incubating

2012-07-10 Thread Fabian Christ
2012/7/10 Jukka Zitting : >> in defense of our mentors: Bertrand and Ross already made their vote >> and now we have one more from Tommaso. > > So you already have three votes from the IPMC. :-) Yes, with the vote from Tommaso we have the votes we needed :) This is the overall vote result includi

Re: [VOTE] Apache Stanbol Entityhub 0.10.0-incubating

2012-07-10 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi, 2012/7/10 Jukka Zitting : > http://incubator.apache.org/stanbol/team.html says: Bertrand > Delacretaz, Ross Gardler, Ted Dunning, Tommaso Teofili in defense of our mentors: Bertrand and Ross already made their vote and now we have one more from Tommaso. Thanks! -- Fabian http://twitter.com

Re: [VOTE] Apache Stanbol Entityhub 0.10.0-incubating

2012-07-10 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi Tommaso, thanks for your time and vote. It is really appreciated :) Best, - Fabian 2012/7/10 Tommaso Teofili : > Sorry for my late vote, everything (build, test, sigs, checks, etc.) looks > fine to me. > +1 > > Tommaso > > 2012/7/10 Fabian Christ > >> De

Re: [VOTE] Apache Stanbol Entityhub 0.10.0-incubating

2012-07-10 Thread Fabian Christ
Dear Incubator, the Apache Stanbol podling is still in need for one more vote from an IPMC member on this release. Please, have a look and make your vote. This vote is now open for two weeks! Best, - Fabian 2012/7/6 Fabian Christ : > Hi, > > this vote is now open for about 10 days a

Re: [VOTE] Apache Stanbol Entityhub 0.10.0-incubating

2012-07-08 Thread Fabian Christ
, - Fabian 2012/7/3 Fabian Christ : > Dear Incubator, > > this vote is still open and we are looking for at least one more vote from > an IPMC member to pass. Would be great if someone finds the time to verify > the release. > > - Fabian > > *(Sent from my mobile. Sorry for typo

Re: [VOTE] Apache Stanbol Entityhub 0.10.0-incubating

2012-07-03 Thread Fabian Christ
Dear Incubator, this vote is still open and we are looking for at least one more vote from an IPMC member to pass. Would be great if someone finds the time to verify the release. - Fabian *(Sent from my mobile. Sorry for typos.) Am 29.06.2012 08:46 schrieb "Fabian Christ" : > Hi,

[VOTE] Apache Stanbol Entityhub 0.10.0-incubating

2012-06-28 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi, please vote for releasing Apache Stanbol 0.10.0-incubating (RC3). This release has already passed the PPMC vote [1] with +1 : 4 votes (including 3 PPMC votes and 1 IPMC vote) 0 : 0 votes -1 : 0 votes So, we need at least 2 more votes from IPMC members. [1] http://markmail.org/thread/grjbi

Re: [VOTE] Apache Stanbol Entityhub 0.10.0-incubating

2012-06-26 Thread Fabian Christ
2012/6/26 sebb : > Where is the SVN tag for the release? Here are the SVN tags. - source-assembly-0.10.0-incubating tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/source-assembly-0.10.0-incubating - stanbol-parent-1-incubating tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stan

[VOTE] Apache Stanbol Entityhub 0.10.0-incubating

2012-06-26 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi, please vote for releasing Apache Stanbol 0.10.0-incubating (RC3). This release has already passed the PPMC vote [1] with +1 : 4 votes (including 3 PPMC votes and 1 IPMC vote) 0 : 0 votes -1 : 0 votes So, we need at least 2 more votes from IPMC members. [1] http://markmail.org/thread/grjbi

Re: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] cTAKES for the Apache Incubator

2012-06-06 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi, [X] +1 to recommend cTAKES to be an Apache Incubator Project -- Fabian http://twitter.com/fctwitt - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.ap

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Stanbol 0.9.0-incubating Released

2012-05-09 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi, The Apache Stanbol PPMC is pleased to announce the first release of Apache Stanbol versioned as 0.9.0-incubating. Downloads are available at: http://incubator.apache.org/stanbol/downloads/releases.html The Maven artifacts will shortly be available via Maven central. Regards, - The Apache S

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Stanbol 0.9.0-incubating

2012-05-06 Thread Fabian Christ
again, - Fabian 2012/5/2 Andreas Kuckartz : > +1 non-binding > > On 02.05.2012 11:28, Fabian Christ wrote: >> Hi, >> >> this is the first Apache Stanbol (incubating) release. Please vote for >> releasing >> >> *Apache Stanbol 0.9.0-incubating* >> &

[VOTE] Release Apache Stanbol 0.9.0-incubating

2012-05-02 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi, this is the first Apache Stanbol (incubating) release. Please vote for releasing *Apache Stanbol 0.9.0-incubating* The RC7 for this release has passed our PPMC vote and we already have three binding +1 votes from IPMC members. The PPMC vote thread can be found here http://markmail.org/thread

Incubator Wiki write access

2012-05-02 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi, I need write access to the incubator Wiki. My Wiki user name is: Fabian Christ My Apache user is: fchrist Best, - Fabian -- Fabian http://twitter.com/fctwitt - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr

Confusion about inclusion of binary dependencies in source releases

2012-03-30 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi, the confusion about including binary dependencies in a source release may result from podling guideline documents like this http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-dependencies which contains sentences like: "A list should be compiled of the project's dependen

Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC0

2012-03-29 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi, Am 26. März 2012 17:20 schrieb Roy T. Fielding : > On Mar 26, 2012, at 4:41 PM, Karl Wright wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:24 AM, sebb wrote: >>> On 26 March 2012 02:38, Shinichiro Abe wrote: >>> The LICENSE file includes references to lots of jars that are dual >>> licensed under CDDL

Re: [VOTE] DeviceMap to join the Apache incubator

2011-12-29 Thread Fabian Christ
+1 (non binding) Am 29. Dezember 2011 22:52 schrieb Kevan Miller : > +1 (binding) > > --kevan > > On Dec 29, 2011, at 11:05 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > >> Hi Incubator PMC members (*), >> >> I've just reviewed the "[PROPOSAL] Apache DeviceMap..." thread and I >> think all relevant issues have

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache DeviceMap, a data repository and APIs for mobile device information

2011-12-28 Thread Fabian Christ
+1 Sounds like a cool and really useful idea. - Fabian Am 27. Dezember 2011 17:10 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz : > Hi James, > > On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 6:28 PM, James Rosewell wrote: >> ...Would device data licensed under the Mozilla Public License be >> compatible with the aims of this Proposa

Re: [PROPOSAL] Boot strapping Android projects @ Apache

2010-11-09 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi, just started with my first Android app a few days ago to get a feeling what it is like to develop mobile apps. It would be very nice to have an Apache interest group and see what others do and which projects may arise. Best, -Fabian Am Dienstag, den 09.11.2010, 10:13 -0500 schrieb Noel J. Be

Re: FOO proposal and Clerezza

2010-11-02 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi, Am Dienstag, den 02.11.2010, 08:17 +0100 schrieb Reto Bachmann-Gmuer: > > IMO the best is to view Clerezza and FOO as sister projects, with > lots > > of exchanges between their communities and a sizable chunk of common > > software components, but different end goals and audiences. This > wil