RE: [MENTORS] Sign off on Incubator Reports

Hi Justin, I have just signed off and added my comments. Thank you. Regards, Uma -Original Message- From: Justin Mclean Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2019 6:03 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: [MENTORS] Sign off on Incubator Reports Hi, The report has been submitted but

RE: Podling reports due Wednesday

HI Justin and Felix, I have just put my sign off. Yes, you are right. I am not sure where its going. I only see 1 or 2 members in lists that to very rarely. I feel it is still far away to come to graduation. I also don’t see any releases from long time. This project's PPMC is not active.

RE: [VOTE] Graduate Apache ServiceComb (incubating)

+1 (binding) Regards, Uma -Original Message- From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 11:31 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache ServiceComb (incubating) +1 (binding) > On Sep 26, 2018, at 12:06 AM, Roman

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Ratis (incubating) 0.2.0 (rc2)

+1 (binding) DISCLAIMER exists LICENSE & NOTICE looks good. Build is fine and passed Incubating tag exists in name Regards, Uma From: Elek, Marton [e...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2018 8:59 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: [VOTE]

Re: [DISCUSS] Dr. Elephant Incubator Proposal

I would +1 to have as a separate project instead of pushing under Hadoop. When a project can sustain by having potential to build community on its own and can run logically as independent module, I feel that’s good enough to start as separate project. I could not recall the discussions on

Re: [VOTE] Accept ServiceComb into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Regards, Uma On 11/13/17, 10:15 PM, "Willem Jiang" wrote: Hi All, I would like to start a VOTE to bring the ServiceComb project in as an Apache incubator podling. The ASF voting rules are described:

Re: [VOTE] Resolution to graduate Apache Impala to TLP

+1 (binding) Regards, Uma On Nov 8, 2017 8:28 PM, "Jim Apple" wrote: > The graduation of Impala to a TLP has been discussed[0] on dev@impala, > voted on[1] on dev@impala, and discussed[2] on general@incubator. All > threads were open 72 hours or

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating [rc1]

+1 (binding) Regards, Uma On 11/14/17, 1:41 PM, "Gang(Gary) Wang" wrote: +1 Thanks! Best, Gary On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 9:27 AM, solrac...@apache.org wrote: > +1 > > 2017-11-14 11:19 GMT-06:00 Johnu

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Mnemonic project from Incubator

+1 (binding) Regards, Uma On 9/19/17, 10:16 AM, "Gang(Gary) Wang" wrote: >Hello IPMC and everyone, > >The Mnemonic community has voted on its Dev list to graduate, The vote >passed with >14 +1s (including +9s from the PPMC) and 0 -1s. > >Here is the vote result thread in the

Re: [DISCUSS] The draft graduation resolution

Content looks good to me. +1 Regards, Uma On 9/12/17, 11:15 AM, "Gang(Gary) Wang" wrote: >Hi everyone > >Please give your feedback on this draft graduation resolution below, >that is proposed by our community and hope we can reach a >consensus on this resolution here before

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.9.0-incubating [rc2]

Forwarding my +1 from dev list. +1 (binding) Regards, Uma On 9/7/17, 3:14 PM, "Johnu George" wrote: >Hello incubator PMCs, > >The Apache Mnemonic community PPMCs and developers have voted and approved >the proposal to release Apache Mnemonic 0.9.0 (incubating). >Apache

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Apache CarbonData Project from the Incubator

My +1 (binding) [carrying my vote from carbondata private list] Sorry for my late vote on this Regards, Uma On 3/21/17, 10:18 PM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" wrote: >Hi, > >this vote passed with the following result: > >+1 (binding): Niclas Hedhman, Julian Hyde, Henry

Re: [VOTE] Apache CarbonData 1.0.0-incubating release (RC2)

+1 (binding) Regards, Uma On 1/24/17, 4:59 AM, "Jacky Li" <13561...@qq.com> wrote: >Hi Incubator PMC, > >Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache >CarbonData(incubating) version 1.0.0. > >PPMC has passed the vote, here's the PPMC vote thread for 1.0.0 release:

Re: [VOTE] Bring Griffin to Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Regards, Uma On 11/30/16, 10:40 PM, "Henry Saputra" wrote: >Hi All, > >As the champion for Griffin, I would like to start VOTE to bring the >project as Apache incubator podling. > >Here is the direct quote from the abstract: > >" >Griffin is a Data

Re: [VOTE] Apache CarbonData 0.2.0-incubating release

Disclaimer exist LICENSE.txt exist Signature file fine Contains incubating I think Readme.md file can have section about Prerequisites and point to https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CARBONDATA/Building+CarbonData+ And+IDE+Configuration >From Wiki ==

Re: [VOTE] Apache CarbonData 0.1.1-incubating release

+1 (binding) Thanks for making the release. Build is fine DISCLAIMER exists. It has Œincubating¹ tag NOTICE & LICENCE files exists Regards, Uma On 10/5/16, 3:06 AM, "Liang Big data" wrote: >Hi all, > >PPMC vote for the release Apache CarbonData 0.1.1-incubating has

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Spot into the Apache Incubator

Thanks Doug. No problem at all. :-) Regards, Uma On 9/24/16, 10:15 AM, "Doug Cutting" <cutt...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 12:03 AM, Gangumalla, Uma ><uma.ganguma...@intel.com> wrote: >> BTW, there were 5 binding votes. > >Oops. Sorry

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Spot into the Apache Incubator

Congrats Spot team. BTW, there were 5 binding votes. Regards, Uma On 9/23/16, 3:33 PM, "Doug Cutting" <cutt...@gmail.com> wrote: >The vote passes, with 7 +1 votes (4 binding) and no -1 votes. > >+1 Jarek Jarcec Cecho (binding) >+1 Gangumalla, Uma >+1 Todd

Re: [VOTE] Accept Spot into the Apache Incubator

+1(binding) Accept Spot into the Apache Incubator Regards, Uma On 9/20/16, 11:15 AM, "Doug Cutting" wrote: >Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a vote on >accepting Spot into the Apache Incubator. > >[] +1 Accept Spot into the Apache Incubator >[] +0

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.2.0-incubating [rc3]

+1 (binding) [ forwarding my +1 from Mnemonic dev list vote ] Regards, Uma On 7/29/16, 2:43 PM, "Gary" wrote: >Hello incubator PMC, > >The Apache Mnemonic community has voted and approved the proposal to >release Apache Mnemonic 0.2.0 (incubating). > >Apache Mnemonic is an

Wiki access

Hi, Can some one grant write access to my Wiki account? UserName: Uma Maheswara Rao G Regards, Uma

Re: [VOTE] Accept CarbonData into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Regards, Uma On 5/25/16, 1:24 PM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" wrote: >Hi all, > >following the discussion thread, I'm now calling a vote to accept >CarbonData into the Incubator. > >​[ ] +1 Accept CarbonData into the Apache Incubator >[ ] +0 Abstain >[ ] -1 Do not

Re: [DISCUSS] CarbonData incubation proposal

+1 (binding) Regards, Uma On 5/18/16, 8:52 PM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" wrote: >Hi all, > >We would like to discuss about a new proposal for the incubator: >CarbonData. > >CarbonData is a new Apache Hadoop native file format for faster >interactive query using advanced

Re: [VOTE] Accept PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Regards, Uma On 5/23/16, 3:22 PM, "Andrew Purtell" wrote: >Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like >to call a VOTE >on accepting PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator. > >Proposal:

Re: [DISCUSS] CarbonData incubation proposal

Since the Parquet is ASF project, referencing may make sense to me,Yes, I think Parquet project guys can comment on this point whether is it make sense for them. >With the usual precautions of a BD scan on the incoming IP and ongoing diligence by the PPMC we'll be fine. Thanks Julian for this

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.1.2-incubating [rc2] (Revised)

+1 (binding) Thanks Justin. Good idea, we will update README.txt. Here is the JIRA ticket filed by Gary to track it. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNEMONIC-51 BTW, below is the build success with mvn -pl '!mnemonic-memory-services/mnemonic-nvml-vmem-service' clean package This is in

Re: Request to join Incubator PMC

Hi Suneel, I think we may need to send mail to private@incubator as this is generally to deal in private. I also sent a mail but waiting for response from IPMC. :-) Regards, Uma On 3/29/16, 10:24 AM, "Suneel Marthi" wrote: >Hi All, > >I am interested in joining the

Re: [VOTE] Accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Regards, Uma On 3/22/16, 2:01 PM, "shaposh...@gmail.com on behalf of Roman Shaposhnik" wrote: >Hi! > >Quickstep proposal was made available for discussion last week >https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/QuickstepProposal >and

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

Proposal looks very good and clear. This project should be a good addition. +1 (non-binding) Regards, Uma On 3/17/16, 1:17 PM, "Daniel Dai" wrote: >Hi, > >I would like to propose Omid as an Apache Incubator project: > >https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OmidProposal > >I've

Re: [VOTE] Accept Tephra into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non binding) Regards, Uma On 3/3/16, 5:29 PM, "Poorna Chandra" wrote: >Hi All, > >Tephra proposal was sent out for discussion last week. The proposal is >available at https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TephraProposal > >Please vote to accept Tephra into the Apache

Re: [VOTE] Accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Regards, Uma On 3/1/16, 4:53 PM, "Andrew Purtell" wrote: >Greetings, > >The discussion of the Gearpump proposal has concluded. Please vote to >accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator. I will leave this vote open for >at least the next 72 hours and will

Re: [VOTE] Accept Mnemonic into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Regards, Uma On 2/29/16, 9:37 AM, "Patrick Hunt" wrote: >Hi folks, > >OK the discussion is now completed. Please VOTE to accept Mnemonic >into the Apache Incubator. I¹ll leave the VOTE open for at least >the next 72 hours, with hopes to close it Thursday the

Re: [DISCUSS] Mnemonic incubator proposal

Hi Liang, Thank you for your interest. Sure we would consider you adding in interested contributors list. >Mnemonic is trying to solve performance issues associated with serialization/deserialization of java object when dealing with JVM & disk directly as well as GC pressure caused by caching ?