+1 (binding)
Best of luck!
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023, 6:18 PM Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Following the discussion in the incubator mailing list [1], I am starting
> this official vote for the XTable project.
>
> Here is the proposal -
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/I
I appreciate the name update. That addresses my concern there. Thanks for
the quick update!
If only all namings I've been involved in were that quick :)
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023, 11:49 AM Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
wrote:
> The package would be xtable.
> As for the pronunciation, I was pronouncing it
8:28 AM Jacques Nadeau wrote:
> I've shared this feedback with Jesus prior to the proposal but would like
> to do here as well. This project is trying to make multiple open source
> projects work together. It would be nice to see representation from
> multiple of those communi
I've shared this feedback with Jesus prior to the proposal but would like
to do here as well. This project is trying to make multiple open source
projects work together. It would be nice to see representation from
multiple of those communities. I feel that true success of this project is
heavily in
+1 (binding).
Congrats
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 2:27 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Best Regards,
> Dave
>
> > On May 15, 2020, at 5:39 PM, Ryan Blue wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > With the support of our mentors (as well as helpful ASF members), the
> > Apache Iceberg community
+1 (binding)
Downloaded, reviewed licenses. Spot check for bad licenses. Built from
source + tests.
Nice job on the first release guys!
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 4:05 PM James Taylor wrote:
> +1 (binding).
>
> Successfully downloaded, verified license, verified checksum, verified
> signature, bu
+1
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018, 3:00 PM Wes McKinney wrote:
> hi folks,
>
> I missed that the software grant for this had not yet been filed with
> the ASF secretary, but this is done now. I have updated the IP
> Clearance document and will leave this vote open for another 72 hours
> from now.
>
> Than
I just realized that I've either lost my account (or never had one) for
editing the Wiki. Can I get edit access?
Username: jacquesnadeau
thanks!
Jacques
gmail dot com)
> * Neng Lu(freeneng at gmail dot com)
> * Runhang Li (obj dot runhang at gmail dot com)
> * Sanjeev Kulkarni (sanjeevrk at gmail dot com)
> * Supun Kamburugamuve (supun at apache dot org)*
> * Thomas Sun (tom dot ssf at gmail dot com)
> * Yaliang Wang (yaliang dot
+1 binding
On Apr 27, 2017 1:35 PM, "Jitendra Pandey" wrote:
> Re-affirming. +1 (binding)
>
> On 4/27/17, 1:24 PM, "Ashutosh Chauhan"
> wrote:
>
> Re-affirming my vote as well:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Julian Hyde
> wrote:
>
> > Re-affriming my vot
+1 (binding)
Good luck guys!
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Hugo Louro wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 3:56 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 6:31 PM Davor Bonaci wrote:
> >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > > Please vote on the draft resolution pro
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Andrew Purtell
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> > On Dec 1, 2016, at 8:35 AM, Felix Cheung wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:40 PM Henry Saputra
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> As the champion for Griffin, I would like to start VOT
I didn't see the last +1 so I reviewed and also gave you a +1. Guess that
is not needed now :P
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 5:33 AM, Liang Chen wrote:
> Hi
>
> Finally, this vote passed with the following result:
>
> +1 (binding) : John D. Ament,Henry Saputra,Uma Gangumalla,Jean-Baptiste
> Onofré
>
>
Built, ran tests, checked signatures.
Agree that next build shouldn't pass without clarification on build
instructions.
For this build:
+1 (binding)
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 5:33 AM, Liang Chen wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thanks John.
> Definitely, we would provide the more clear build instructions.
>
>
+1 (binding)
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 4:04 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 4:41 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > following the discussion thread, I'm now calling a vote to accept
> > CarbonData into the Incubator.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Accept CarbonData
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 5:57 AM, Jeremiah Lowin wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Jeremiah
>
>
> > On Mar 25, 2016, at 8:26 AM, Suresh Marru wrote:
> >
> > + 1 (binding).
> >
> > Suresh
> >
> >> On Mar 24, 2016, at 11:00 PM, Siddharth Anand
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Following the discussion
+1 (binding)
thanks,
Jacques
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> OK the discussion is now completed. Please VOTE to accept Mnemonic
> into the Apache Incubator. I’ll leave the VOTE open for at least
> the next 72 hours, with hopes to close it Thursday the 3rd of
Hey YanPing,
This addition is nice to see. I agree that there is great opportunity for
the Arrow and Mnemonic communities to collaborate. I look forward to
working together.
Jacques
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Wang, Yanping
wrote:
> Hi, All
>
> Based on feedback, we added following into M
I've used this as reference previously:
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#prohibited
Specifically this sentence:
"...For example, using a GPL'ed tool during the build is OK."
That would suggest that using GPL tools for build and test should be okay.
I'll let others address the distribu
+1 binding - Jacques Nadeau
On Feb 2, 2016 8:11 PM, "Greg Trasuk" wrote:
>
> +1 (Binding) - Greg Trasuk
>
>
> > On Feb 2, 2016, at 10:05 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The Guacamole proposal was discussed couple
I tried to build and got this message:
$ brew install gradle
==> Downloading
https://downloads.gradle.org/distributions/gradle-2.8-bin.zip
100.0%
🍺 /usr/local/Cellar/gradle/2.8: 164 files, 47M, built in 6 seconds
$ gradle w
+1 (binding)
Jacques
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Amol Kekre wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Amol
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 8:02 AM, Ryan Merriman
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> >
> > On 12/4/15, 10:00 AM, "james sirota"
> > wrote:
> >
> > >+1 (non-binding)
> > > From: Billie
A few thoughts from a 'bystander':
It's great that Greg and the others who disagree cast their dissenting
votes. That doesn't mean that we should throw out process. If the process
is 3x+1 and more +1 than -1, this vote passes as Henry stated. Greg even
stated (if I understand his statements correc
+1
Great to see this coming to the foundation!
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like
> > to call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu int
+1. The Jekyll flow is great and has a low learning curve.
On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 3:12 PM, larry mccay wrote:
> +1 - this would be a great resource for bootstrapping a new project!
>
> On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Julian Hyde wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > I had the same thought when I built Calcit
er.
> > * Julien Le Dem (julien), PMC Chair of Parquet, PMC member of Pig and
> Tez.
> > * Jacques Nadeau (jacques), PMC Chair of Drill, PMC member of Calcite.
> >
> > Welcome aboard -- w
I would like to join the IPMC. I'm PMC Chair of Drill, a PMC member for
Calcite and have also contributed to Parquet & HBase. Let me know what you
need.
thanks,
Jacques
+1 (non-binding). Props go especially to Julian for all that he has done to
establish the community.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Steven Noels wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015, at 03:56 AM, Julian Hyde wrote:
>
> > This is a vote for Calcite to become a top-level project.
> >
> > Since joining
ist.
>
> Ashutosh
>
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Alan Gates wrote:
>
>> Forwarding my +1 from the Calcite vote.
>>
>> Alan.
>>
>> Jacques Nadeau
>> August 28, 2015 at 14:32
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The Calcite community has voted
Hi Justin,
I've filed CALCITE-860 and CALCITE-861 to address the issues you
identified. We'll be sure to get them addressed for the next release.
Thanks for reviewing the release and voting.
Jacques
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +0 (binding) and please fix up
Thanks for helping clarify Marvin. I didn't realize that Julian was an
IPMC. I was only counting the two mentors that voted in our vote.
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Jacques Nadeau
> wrote:
>
> > Vote resu
release. The vote
is open for 72 hours, or until the necessary number of votes (3 +1)
is reached.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Calcite 1.4.0-incubating
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
Jacques Nadeau, on behalf of Apache Calcite PPMC
This vote thread looks like a hanging chad. The current vote count is:
+1 Ted
+1 Lars
+1 Justin
+1 or -1: Grant
-0 Jan
I would love to have a clarification vote from Grant. I read his concern
and the subsequent messages to mean +1 but I'm a bit biased as I'd like to
see this release go out. Wh
Hello Everybody, I'm pleased to announce the 0.5.0 release of Apache Drill.
It includes a huge amount of work from everyone in the community. You can
read more about it on our blog [1] or check out the release notes [2].
Download it now [3] and let us know what you think!
[1] https://blogs.apac
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 4:27 PM, John D. Ament
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Ted,
> >> >
> >> > Do you mean more than here:
> >> >
> >> > [1]: http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html
> >> > [2]: h
.html#host-rc
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 12:48 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 3:39 PM, jan i wrote:
>
> > On 7 September 2014 21:31, Jacques Nadeau wrote:
> >
> > > As I understand the release guidelines, one is not allowed to put
> > something
ot staged in the proper place (e.g.
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ )
>
> If this gets moved, I can vote +1
>
> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Jacques Nadeau
> wrote:
>
> > Hi John,
> >
> > Thanks for the feedback. I'd like to re
data directory.
> Ideally, your directory name should match the release version (0.5.0.rc2 vs
> 0.5.0)
>
> John
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Jacques Nadeau
> wrote:
>
> > It is my pleasure to present the Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release to
> > th
It is my pleasure to present the Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release to
the general incubator list for a vote. This set of artifacts have passed
our drill-dev vote and incorporate a number of improvements with over 100
JIRAs closed in the last month.
As part of this release, we looked to addres
get it exactly right on
our next attempt. Justin, would you be willing to review these changes
once we get them up so that we can make sure we're not making other foolish
mistakes?
thanks,
Jacques
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Jacques Nadeau wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Sorry I didn
Hey guys,
Sorry I didn't see Henry and Justin's comments until just now. Per
Justin's primary concerns about the License stuff: I think we've just made
mistakes in the notice and license files as to exactly how we reference
things. All the category B licenses are mvn binary dependencies (per the
gt;
> John
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Jacques Nadeau wrote:
>
> > Hey Ted,
> >
> > Those SNAPSHOT dependencies are a bit misleading. Because Drill is so
> > closely coupled to the Optiq and Parquet codebase, we need to generate
> > separa
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Jacques Nadeau wrote:
>
> > We've held a vote on drill-dev to release the 0.4.0-incubating release of
> > Apache Drill.
> >
> > The vote thread can be found here:
> >
> >
> http://mail-archives.a
We've held a vote on drill-dev to release the 0.4.0-incubating release of
Apache Drill.
The vote thread can be found here:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201407.mbox/%3CCAKa9qD%3DKQURAMcS3RQJbUABSU4%3DDEGSewK2s4MAAidu4c%3DOjBg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
The vote passed with
44 matches
Mail list logo
