Stepping down as Page Speed mentor

I have not been able to commit the amount of time and energy needed to fulfill my obligations as mentor to the Page Speed podling, and thus I am stepping down as a mentor. Hopefully someone else will be able to help them to graduation. Thanks.

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Traffic Control to a top level project

Apache Traffic > > Control Project; and be it further > > > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are > > appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Traffic Control > > Project: > > > > * Dan Kirkwood &l

Re: [DISCUSS] Resolution to graduate Traffic Control to a top level project

g> > * David Neuman <neu...@apache.org> > * Dewayne Richardson <dewr...@apache.org> > * Eric Covener <cove...@apache.org> > * Eric Friedrich <fri...@apache.org> > * Hank Beatty<hbea...@apache.org> > * Jan van

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control (incubating) 2.1.0-RC3

+1 (binding). After having fought with docker for a bit I was able to build packages. Sig and hashes check out as well. We should work on getting all our GPG keys signed by each other next summit, but that is not a show stopper in my opinion. Thanks! On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:45 AM Leif

Re: [PROPOSAL] PageSpeed

I would be interested in helping out in a mentor role. Thanks. On Mon, Sep 25, 2017, 14:29 Leif Hedstrom wrote: > > > On Sep 20, 2017, at 4:44 AM, Otto van der Schaaf > wrote: > > > > Dear Apache Incubator Community, > > > > We are excited to share our

Re: [DISCUSS] Podlings & Gitbox Usage

+1 On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:00 AM aditi hilbert wrote: > +1 > The Apache Mynewt community loves it. > > thanks, > aditi > > > On Jul 28, 2017, at 8:48 AM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > > > All, > > > > As many are aware, Infra has been rolling out a new

Re: ZeroMQ licensing in Apache MXNet

What about nanomsg? It's supposed to be a functional replacement for ZeroMQ, has C++ bindings available and is MIT licensed. http://nanomsg.org/documentation-zeromq.html On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 8:02 AM Felix Cheung wrote: > I think the header is required at compile time

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 2.0.0 incubating (RC6)

Checksums match. GPG sig verifies, but is untrusted: $ gpg --verify apache-trafficcontrol-2.0.0-incubating.tar.gz.asc gpg: assuming signed data in `apache-trafficcontrol-2.0.0-incubating.tar.gz' gpg: Signature made Fri 16 Jun 2017 10:25:33 AM MDT using RSA key ID 9AB7BDD5 gpg: Good signature from

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.1-incubating (RC0)

+1 binding. Agree with statements made up-thread. Built all artifacts using docker. -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 986K Jun 13 00:13 build-traffic_monitor.log -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 130K Jun 13 00:12 build-traffic_ops.log -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 205K Jun 13 00:13 build-traffic_portal.log

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 8:21 AM Jim Jagielski wrote: > Make it so! +1! (binding) > > > On May 16, 2017, at 10:39 PM, Bryan Call wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > As the champion for Pulsar, I would like to start a VOTE to bring the > > project in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC11)

Checksums and signature validate. Builds. +1. On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 9:44 AM Dan Kirkwood wrote: > Sorry -- I used the same template as the previous RC.. A couple of > the descriptions of links above are not accurate, but the content is > correct: > > The updated

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

+1 (binding) On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 9:28 AM Dan Kirkwood wrote: > Minor correction to the previous email -- the artifacts for RC9 are > located here > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/trafficcontrol/1.8.0/RC9/ > . > > Please review this RC and vote.. > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy Question: GA for GitHub for Podlings

Reading the other thread on this it seems it has not yet. Let me know if any external to infra help is wanted. Thanks. On Mon, Nov 7, 2016, 16:29 Phil Sorber <sor...@apache.org> wrote: > I am +1 on both as well. My understanding is that there was an LDAP > hurdle. Has that b

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy Question: GA for GitHub for Podlings

I am +1 on both as well. My understanding is that there was an LDAP hurdle. Has that been resolved? On Mon, Nov 7, 2016, 15:24 Chris Mattmann wrote: > Hi, > > As some of you may have seen the OpenWhisk podling being discussed now has > requested to use GitHub as its primary

Re: Traffic Control Incubator Code Grant next steps

Great, thanks! On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 11:33 PM Craig Russell <craig.russ...@oracle.com> wrote: > Hi Phil, > > > > On Oct 5, 2016, at 9:51 AM, Phil Sorber <sor...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > So we now have CCLA's on file from all contributing corps

Traffic Control Incubator Code Grant next steps

So we now have CCLA's on file from all contributing corps as well as ICLA's from all individual contributors. Have we satisfied the requirements to make a release from the incubator or are there still additional steps like an IP Clearance vote? I've seen those threads, but they look like code

wiki write access for PhilSorber

Hi all, can you grant karma to "PhilSorber" to edit the incubator wiki? Thanks.

Re: [VOTE] Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator

gle.com/forum/#!forum/traffic_control-announce > * https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/traffic_control-discuss > > Proposed ASF maintained lists: > * priv...@traffic-control.incubator.apache.org (moderated subscriptions) > * d...@traffic-control.incubator.apache.org > * comm...@tr