On 2017-06-06 11:59 (-0500), Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 8:25 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> > While these are all great discussion points, I don't believe they're
> > relevant to incubator only and probably should have remained on the
> > legal-discuss list. Ignite graduated
é
Luciano Resende
Andrew Purtell
Brock Noland
Raphael Bircher
Hitesh Shah
non-binding:
Sean Busbey
Ismaël MejÃa
Marcelo Vanzin
Neelesh Salian
Phillip Rhodes
Kostas Sakellis
Jeff Zhang
Saisai Shao
tim shea
Pierre Smits
Arpit Agarwal
Madhawa Kasun Gunasekara
Bruno Mahé
Felix Cheung
-busbey
On 2017-0
ibutor.
= Additional Interested Contributors =
Those interested in getting involved with the project as we enter incubation
are encouraged to list themselves here.
* Ismaël MejÃa (ieme...@apache.org)
= Sponsors =
== Champion ==
Sean Busbey (bus...@apache.org)
== Nominated Mentors ==
* Bikas S
John for the feedback.
>
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
>
> > On 2017-05-21 09:46 (-0500), "John D. Ament"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 7:45 PM Sean Busbey wrote:
> > > >
> > > > == Re
On 2017-05-21 09:46 (-0500), "John D. Ament" wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 7:45 PM Sean Busbey wrote:
> >
> > == Reliance on salaried Developers ==
> >
> > The existing contributors to the Livy project have been made by salaried
> > engineers f
On 2017-05-22 03:01 (-0500), Luciano Resende wrote:
> 1>
>
> Also, I see the proposal is short on mentors, so feel free to include me as>
> a mentor for the project.>
>
> Thanks>
>
Thanks Luciano! I've added you to the wiki page as a mentor.
ng involved with the project as we enter incubation
are encourage to list themselves here.
* < add here >
= Sponsors =
== Champion ==
* Sean Busbey (bus...@apache.org)
== Nominated Mentors ==
* Bikas Saha (bi...@apache.org)
* Brock Noland (br...@phdata.io)
== Sponsoring Entity ==
Hi Folks!
Sadly, other commitments in my life require that I step down the amount of
volunteer time I spend on the ASF. I had originally thought that I'd still have
time for mentoring the two podlings I've been involved with (Gossip and Rya),
but it doesn't look that way.
As such, I'm hoping s
+1
On 2016-07-05 14:04 (-0500), Jake Farrell wrote:
> This thread is to start a vote on the graduation resolution Apache Kudu has
> approved on the dev list with 12 positive votes (11 PPMC, 1 community (6
> from IPMC members))
>
> Status page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/kudu.html
> Gr
The user list will be added when we have broader adoption.
> == Git Repository ==
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-gossip.git
> == Issue Tracking ==
> JIRA tracker: GOSSIP
> = Initial Committers =
> * Edward Capriolo (ecapriolo at apache dot org)
> * Josh C
This got discussed at length over the Metron proposal. We only need to
worry about an SGA from the original codebase authors if there is
still an active community.
AFAICT, there is not. A notice to the original authors about what's
happening with encouragement for them to show up if they're intere
I was just coming to general@ to ask about this topic, since I'm
mentoring a podling (rya) that would like some folks added to jenkins
access.
Ted, as the Chair of the IPMC are you fine with delegating to mentors
who happen to be VPs of other PMCs?
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 7:18 PM, John D. Ament
Encouraging use of Whisker from the Apache Creadur project is another
avenue:
http://creadur.apache.org/whisker/
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >> But better conventions on the format and content of the files that would
> >> make automated processing easier would
Great proposal. I like that your proposal includes a well presented
roadmap, but I don't see any goals that directly address building a larger
community. Y'all have any ideas around outreach that will help with
adoption?
As a start, I recommend y'all add a section to the proposal on the wiki
page
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> >...
>
> > As far as I can tell from the proposals and DISCUSS, RTC was the process
> > already present in the community proposed. If the -1 folks would like to
>
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> On 12/01/2015 11:37 PM, Henry Robinson wrote:
> > On 1 December 2015 at 14:32, Bertrand Delacretaz >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:51 PM, Henry Robinson
> wrote:
> >>> ...
> >>> Binding -1s (4):
> >>> Greg Stein
> >>>
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like to
> call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF Incubator. The proposal is
> pasted below and also available on the wiki at:
> https://wiki.
on 2.0)
> > * [[http://tinkerpop.incubator.apache.org/|TinkerPop]] (Apache License,
> > Version 2.0)
> >
> > == Cryptography ==
> > The proposal does not involve any cryptographic code.
> >
> > == Required Resources ==
> > === Mailing lists ===
> >
+1 (binding)
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:56 PM, Julian Hyde wrote:
> This is a vote for Calcite to become a top-level project.
>
> Since joining the Incubator in May, 2014, the Calcite
> community has:
> * Produced eight IPMC-approved releases under two release
> managers;
> * Added five new com
This sounds like a great addition.
Given this proposal, why keep the repo private?
How has community growth/outreach worked to date?
Any documented forward looking plans for the community?
re: mentors, I'd love to see some mentors with strong ties outside of
Accumulo for the project. That said,
ots of things that assume commits@
>
> --David
>
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Henry Saputra
> > wrote:
> >
> >> What is the "notificati...@yetus.apache.org" list for?
> >>
>
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Henry Saputra
wrote:
> What is the "notificati...@yetus.apache.org" list for?
>
> - Henry
>
>
internal build notifications, commits to git. basically all the automated
message stuff.
--
Sean
ot of integration work with testpatch
> for Amabri and Geode. He's already committer on Ambari and
> thus pretty versed in the Apache Way. What would be the best
> way to consider him?
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> >
Hi Folks!
There's a community going through board resolution to move from within
Hadoop to form a new TLP named Yetus. Due to a request on a private list
we've made a incubator proposal summary of the project.
Proposal:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/YetusProposal
tl;dr description: Yetus pr
Can someone please grant me write access to the incubator wiki under the
user name SeanBusbey?
--
Sean
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> > ...My understanding is that the Docker Hub page is under the control of
> the
> > Geode PMC
>
> There's
On Jun 25, 2015 3:01 AM, "Emmanuel Lécharny" wrote:
>
> Le 25/06/15 09:21, Jochen Theodorou a écrit :
> > Am 24.06.2015 22:32, schrieb Emmanuel Lécharny:
> >> Le 24/06/15 22:28, David Nalley a écrit :
> > [...]
> >>> More generally to the underlying issue that prompted this discussion:
> >>> With
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) <
ross.gard...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> There is nothing preventing "clearly identifiable non-release artifacts
> available to the general public". Many projects make automated nightly
> builds available for example.
>
>
The release polic
duties. If the NiFi folks will have him on the
> >> initial PMC and he's willing to join it, this should resolve the stated
> >> concerns.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Friday, June 12, 2015, Sean Busbey wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Fri, Jun
gt; > > between
> > > > >> > systems"
> > > > >> > apply to at least half of all software out there?
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > In other words, the scope is very wide, and could include
> anything
> &
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> > ...I have no reason to believe either my engagement or the PPMC's
> willingness
> > to reach out to or listen to what I have to say will change upon
>
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 5:13 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 12:00 PM, jan i wrote:
> > ...one reason to be in incubator is to learn "the apache way" and that
> > seems hard to learn without other apache people on the project...
>
> Not sure what you mean - the Nifi men
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Joe Witt wrote:
>
>
> Regarding the email address used we will be sure to better reflect
> that in our release guide. The .zip is generated by the
> 'apache-release' profile that comes from the standard
> org.apache/apache/16 artifact. It uses a
> 'apache-sourc
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> -The value of the scm tag ("nifi-0.1.0-incubating-rc13”) in the pom file
> may be incorrect.
>
SCM tag looks present to me:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-nifi.git;a=tag;h=b10fad4171d965f78db8ea0976acdad769a207b9
W
Hi Justin!
The nifi-parent artifact is a part of the current release you're voting on.
you'll have to build the proposed artifacts in the following order:
* nifi-parent
* nifi-nar-maven-plugin
* nifi
For each of the first two, you'll need to follow their respective README on
building but use the
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 3:42 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> Is it me or has the proposal changed since the vote went out? Ideally we
> want the proposal to be final before sending the vote.
>
>
This is why the vote includes the proposal text or a specific wiki
revision. I believe Benson sent the prop
One down side to the github provided analytics is that projects may be
restricted in how they can make use of those analytics in e.g.
presentations. Github has previously asserted that those analytic outputs
are subject to a license grant from github and requested sign off in the
form of a user agr
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful and
> positive conversation, so I offer this vote.
>
> Vote will be open for the usual 72 hours ...
>
> Here is my [+1]
>
--
Sean
I'm really excited to see NiFi come to the incubator; it'd be a great
addition to the ASF.
A few points in the proposal:
> >== Initial Goals ==
One of these should be to grow the community outside of the current niche,
IMHO.
More on this below under "orphaned projects"
> > * Determine and est
39 matches
Mail list logo
