On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You spelled artifacts wrong:
> Verify downloaded artefacts
> other than that, looks good.
>
> Looks like a couple of graduated projects (cxf and tuscany) might want to
> consider removing their incubator artifacts (they ar
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Mike Edwards <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Raymond Feng wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> One of the steps for TLP migration is to add Tuscany to
> >> http://www.apache.org. We nee
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 7:19 AM, Santiago Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> El mar, 15-04-2008 a las 16:24 -0700, Luciano Resende escribió:
> > Could someone on the IPMC please help us get the proper karma to some
> > Tuscany committers that does not have access to
> > repo/private/committers. Fro
The Apache Tuscany team are delighted to announce the 1.1 release of the
Java SCA project.
Apache Tuscany provides a runtime environment based on the Service Component
Architecture (SCA). SCA is a set of specifications aimed at simplifying SOA
application development. These specifications are bein
Hi
The Tuscany project is now ready to distribute its Java SCA Release
1.1-incubating. Following up from Robert's recent post to the Tuscany dev
list [1] I am posting here before proceeding to copy the artifacts up to
www.apache.org/dist/incubator.
The proposal it to use a similar release structu
On Jan 31, 2008 2:30 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 31, 2008 10:27 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > ...ant
> >
> > On Jan 28, 2008 5:31 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
On Jan 31, 2008 10:27 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> ...ant
>
> On Jan 28, 2008 5:31 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > The previous VOTE thread here for SCA Java 1.1-incubating identified
> s
Hi,
The previous VOTE thread here for SCA Java 1.1-incubating identified some
issues.
http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg16483.html
A new release candidate (RC3a) has been created addressing the issues as
discussed in the previous thread. I'm starting this IPMC VOTE thr
On Jan 25, 2008 12:50 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 25/01/2008, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 25, 2008 8:59 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Jan 24, 2008 9:39 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 25, 2008 8:59 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 24, 2008 9:39 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 24/01/2008, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > > Hi sebb
> > >
> > > Thank you for the deta
Hi sebb
Thank you for the detailed review.
Can you tell me what you mean by
On Jan 24, 2008 4:57 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 24/01/2008, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think the NOTICE files in the artifacts that are actually being
> > distributed are OK.
>
> Surely the
Hi,
The Tuscany project had a vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] to publish the
Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release. The vote thread on tuscany-dev has
7 +1s and an archive can be found at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg27321.html
The release includes new function and bug
On 10/18/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It looks pretty good to me.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 4:16 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduate Tuscany as a top level project
>
>
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
