[VOTE] Release Apache Knox-0.3.1-incubating RC3

can be found at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/knox/knox-incubating-0.3.1/CHANGES The release has been signed with key (587C089B): http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x82F9C371587C089B Vote will be open for 72 hours. thanks, --larry Larry McCay

Re: [VOTE] Accept Twill for Incubation

+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Andreas Neumann wrote: > > > The discussion about the Weave proposal has calmed. As the outcome of the > > discussion, we have chosen a new name for the project, Twil

Re: please follow through to publish doc changes

Jake, thank you for taking care of that! I didn't see anything on the Knox mailing list - should I have? Can you tell me exactly what was fixed and where? We will be sure to investigate what went wrong and document the proper procedure going forward. Is there anything that is outstanding that is

Re: [VOTE] Usergrid BaaS Stack for Apache Incubator (revised proposal)

+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Lieven Govaerts wrote: > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Dave wrote: > > I would like to call for a new vote on Usergrid, a multi-tenant > > Backend-as-a-Service stack for web & mobile applications based on RESTful > > APIs, as an Apache Incubat

Re: The podling initial committers issue

it is anyone's fault or anyone is right or wrong. We just need the champion/mentor survey questions established. On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > On Sep 25, 2013, at 1:33 PM, larry mccay wrote: > > > > That shared understanding seems to be what w

Re: The podling initial committers issue

I was under the impression that what you describe was the policy - if it is not then is should certainly be clarified. In the event that podlings continue to or are to be given such a choice, I believe that there needs to be a clear understanding between the incoming community and those volunteers

Re: [VOTE] Usergrid BaaS Stack for Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Good luck! I would be interested in being a committer on user-grid due to the synergies that seem possible between Apache Knox (incubating) and user-grid. If this is something that you would welcome then I would be happy to join as an initial committer. Regardless, good luck an

Re: [VOTE]: Accept Sentry in Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On Aug 5, 2013, at 9:23 AM, Shreepadma Venugopalan wrote: > Following the discussions last week, I'm calling a vote to accept Sentry as > a new project in the Apache Incubator. > > The proposal draft is available at: > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SentryProposal and is al

Re: [PROPOSAL] Sentry for Incubator

Correction: I am a member of the PPMC for Knox - sorry for the typo in my previous reply. On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Larry McCay wrote: > Hi Shreepadma - > > Interesting work. > > Given some more diversity on the mentor list, I would give a +1. > > Being on the

Re: [PROPOSAL] Sentry for Incubator

Hi Shreepadma - Interesting work. Given some more diversity on the mentor list, I would give a +1. Being on the IPMC for Knox, I can easily imagine Sentry and Knox being complementary to each other and look forward to contributing to and/or leveraging this work within Knox. I'd be interested i

Re: [MENTOR] Re: Missing Release Distribution in Clutch Status?

usc.edu/~mattmann/ > > ++ > > Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department > > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > > +

<    1   2