Re: Proposal

2022-05-19 Thread m sacks
Cool. On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 3:37 PM Clebert Suconic wrote: > yep... pretty much > > On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 6:33 PM m sacks wrote: > > > > And if i want to publish it without building community just publish to > github if i understand correctly? > > > >

Re: Proposal

2022-05-19 Thread m sacks
nted to bring you my 2 cents on a way to > go with your project. > > > On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 1:05 AM m sacks wrote: > > > > I have some gpt3 based python code to simulate leonardo da vinci as a > > chatbot proof of concept. I think it could be useful, but i am not sure

Re: Proposal

2022-05-19 Thread m sacks
[1], which is an Apache License 2.0 product. But I also expect most > people on this list would like to see what is proposed and discussed in the > open. > > > > [1] https://github.com/kingoflolz/mesh-transformer-jax/ > > > > > > > > *From: *m sacks > *D

Re: Proposal

2022-05-18 Thread m sacks
So I’m not sure if this made it either: is there at least one person interested in collaborating on this project it involves GPT three? On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 10:47 PM m sacks wrote: > Not sure if this made it: > Just a term of endearment, mot taken to be meant literally. &g

Re: Proposal

2022-05-16 Thread m sacks
n your post. You state "I" have > got code, not "we". > > You can have the best code in the universe, but if you don't have a > community developing it, it's not really a good fit here. > > So tell us less about your code and more about your community developing

Proposal

2022-05-16 Thread m sacks
, 2022 at 9:34 PM m sacks wrote: > Test 1 > > 2 > > 3 > > 4 > > 5 > > 6 > > 7 > > 8 > > 9 > > 0 >

Test

2022-05-16 Thread m sacks
Test 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0