2012/10/18 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name
wrote:
Jukka Zitting wrote on Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:03:43 +0200:
a separate ripple LDAP group (but no ripple-pmc yet)
What would it be needed for?
Nothing,
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Do people mind if web sites (and maybe mailing lists) of new podlings
live at domains of the form ${podling}.incubator.apache.org?
Sounds like we have consensus that this is a good idea. There were
some concerns
Jukka Zitting wrote on Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:03:43 +0200:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name
wrote:
Do people mind if web sites (and maybe mailing lists) of new podlings
live at domains of the form ${podling}.incubator.apache.org?
Sounds like
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Jukka Zitting wrote on Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:03:43 +0200:
a separate ripple LDAP group (but no ripple-pmc yet)
What would it be needed for?
Nothing, assuming we put the git repository at
I would be +1 for simply ${podling}.apache.org, per:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorDeconstructionProposal
Cheers,
Chris
On Oct 12, 2012, at 12:31 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Do people mind if web sites (and maybe mailing lists) of new podlings
live at domains of the form ${podling
I would be +1 for simply ${podling}.apache.org, per:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorDeconstructionProposal
Cheers,
Chris
On Oct 12, 2012, at 12:31 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Do people mind if web sites (and maybe mailing lists) of new podlings
live at domains of the form ${podling
Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote on Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 16:36:20 +:
I would be +1 for simply ${podling}.apache.org, per:
Infra doesn't have an opinion on this. I think it's technically
possible.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Do people mind if web sites (and maybe mailing lists) of new podlings
live at domains of the form ${podling}.incubator.apache.org?
This is in relation to infra work on streamlining TLP migrations. (Case
in point: CMS TLP migrations.) This thread is about the
externally-visible names, not about
I like it -
that will simplify migrations
12.10.2012 11:31 пользователь Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name
написал:
Do people mind if web sites (and maybe mailing lists) of new podlings
live at domains of the form ${podling}.incubator.apache.org?
This is in relation to infra work
at domains of the form ${podling}.incubator.apache.org?
This is in relation to infra work on streamlining TLP migrations. (Case
in point: CMS TLP migrations.) This thread is about the
externally-visible names, not about implementation details
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Do people mind if web sites (and maybe mailing lists) of new podlings
live at domains of the form ${podling}.incubator.apache.org?
Not at all. I'd even be fine with ${podling}.apache.org especially if
they've
Hi
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name
wrote:
Do people mind if web sites (and maybe mailing lists) of new podlings
live at domains of the form ${podling
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
nour.moham...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm, didn't notice that thread before, but still, as Joe pointed,
INFRA should give their opinion about it.
Does Daniel's original email not qualify for that? ;)
--
NS
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
...I'd even be fine with ${podling}.apache.org especially if
they've already completed the PODLINGNAMESEARCH process
Agreed - we could just require a visible standard incubating logo on
podling's websites.
On 12 October 2012 08:31, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Do people mind if web sites (and maybe mailing lists) of new podlings
live at domains of the form ${podling}.incubator.apache.org?
This is in relation to infra work on streamlining TLP migrations. (Case
in point: CMS TLP
On 12 October 2012 12:58, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
wrote:
...I'd even be fine with ${podling}.apache.org especially if
they've already completed the PODLINGNAMESEARCH process
Agreed - we
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 2:07 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 October 2012 12:58, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
wrote:
...I'd even be fine with ${podling}.apache.org especially if
they've
sebb wrote on Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 13:05:06 +0100:
On 12 October 2012 08:31, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Do people mind if web sites (and maybe mailing lists) of new podlings
live at domains of the form ${podling}.incubator.apache.org?
This is in relation to infra work
On Friday, October 12, 2012, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Daniel Shahaf
d...@daniel.shahaf.namejavascript:;
wrote:
Do people mind if web sites (and maybe mailing lists) of new podlings
live at domains of the form ${podling}.incubator.apache.org
Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Daniel Shahaf
d...@daniel.shahaf.namejavascript:;
wrote:
Do people mind if web sites (and maybe mailing lists) of new podlings
live at domains of the form ${podling}.incubator.apache.org?
Not at all. I'd even be fine
20 matches
Mail list logo
