[DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

Hi, I would like to propose Omid as an Apache Incubator project: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OmidProposal I've posted posted the text of the proposal below: Thanks, Daniel = Omid Proposal = === Abstract === Omid is a flexible, reliable, high performant and scalable ACID transactional f

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

I don’t think it’s the Incubator’s job to choose which competing projects should join the foundation. All we’re here to do is to make sure that a community knows how to act like an Apache community, and that the artifacts are licensed properly. It’s probably worth pointing out to both projects

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

I know Apache incubator does not play favorite but it is getting awkward that TWO transaction engine for HBase coming to incubator at the same time. As most people know, the other one is Tephra, that just coming to incubator few weeks ago. As member of IPMC, I would like to see Omid provide some

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Good luck lads, St.Ack On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Daniel Dai wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to propose Omid as an Apache Incubator project: > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OmidProposal > > I've posted posted the text of the proposal below: > > Thanks, > Daniel > > = Omid

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

+1 Glad to see this hit incubator. Feel free to add me as a mentor if you'd like another. Daniel Dai wrote: Hi, I would like to propose Omid as an Apache Incubator project: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OmidProposal I've posted posted the text of the proposal below: Thanks, Daniel =

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

On Fri, 18 Mar 2016, Greg Trasuk wrote: I don’t think it’s the Incubator’s job to choose which competing projects should join the foundation. All we’re here to do is to make sure that a community knows how to act like an Apache community, and that the artifacts are licensed properly. This is

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

I understand the concern, so let me try to offer some facts and see if we can make progress from there. Omid has been around for some time now, and its initial design appeared in a couple of research papers that I actually co-authored. The architecture is based on the idea of having a centrali

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

Those are great observations, Nick. Merging projects is often hard even if the developers are willing to do it, though. The projects could be already running in production and major changes could be disruptive to the point of making the merged project not viable. Attempting to merge projects th

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

Proposal looks very good and clear. This project should be a good addition. +1 (non-binding) Regards, Uma On 3/17/16, 1:17 PM, "Daniel Dai" wrote: >Hi, > >I would like to propose Omid as an Apache Incubator project: > >https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OmidProposal > >I've posted posted the te

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

Thanks for the great explanation, Flavio. As many have mentioned before, it is definitely ok to have similar projects in ASF. We have prior acts before and I didn't expect incubator to reject good projects coming in. My intention was to avoid split of resources where both projects have very simil

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

Apache Phoenix just released version 4.7.0 with big news: transactions support, using Tephra. There's some interest in a successful Tephra incubation beyond the podling already. That said, that new code in Phoenix can be made pluggable to support more than one transaction oracle. Omid might be a

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Regards JB On 03/17/2016 09:17 PM, Daniel Dai wrote: Hi, I would like to propose Omid as an Apache Incubator project: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OmidProposal I've posted posted the text of the proposal below: Thanks, Daniel = Omid Proposal = === Abstract === Omid is a

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) --Chris Nauroth On 3/17/16, 1:17 PM, "Daniel Dai" wrote: >Hi, > >I would like to propose Omid as an Apache Incubator project: > >https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OmidProposal > >I've posted posted the text of the proposal below: > >Thanks, >Daniel > >= Omid Proposal = > >=== Ab

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

That seems be a good approach for Apache Phoenix to enable possible different transaction engine. - Henry On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > Apache Phoenix just released version 4.7.0 with big news: transactions > support, using Tephra. There's some interest in a successfu

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

Hi Henry, It seems you (and several others) are forgetting the Trafodion, which also privides transactions on N*SQL solutions, see http trafodion.apache.org Best regards, Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM OFBiz based solutions & services OFBiz Extensions Marketplace http://oem.of

RE: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

. HBASE-11447 Proposal for a generic transaction API for HBase Regards, Atanu -Original Message- From: Pierre Smits [mailto:pierre.sm...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2016 1:35 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator Hi Henry

RE: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

ng Omid (non binding) Regards, Sean -Original Message- From: Pierre Smits [mailto:pierre.sm...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2016 1:35 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator Hi Henry, It seems you (and several others) are forg

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

+1 -C On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 7:26 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote: > I understand the concern, so let me try to offer some facts and see if we can > make progress from there. > > Omid has been around for some time now, and its initial design appeared in a > couple of research papers that I actual

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

Hi Pierre, Thanks for your reply. Yes, I remember Trafodion, but since it is more complete solution of SQL + Transaction, I did not mention it as comparisons. But the comment is valid, meaning there were already prior acts about Transaction support for NoSQL in Apache, so no reason to "reject" or

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

That'd be great to allow different transaction frameworks to plug into Phoenix. I suspect that transactions are in the same boat as secondary indexing with a one-size-fits-all approach not being feasible across the variety of use cases we see. Having a pluggable mechanism would be a good solution.

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

Thanks for the comments. Though there are already lots of +1s, this thread is not intended for voting. I will send out the voting email shortly. Daniel On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 1:08 PM, James Taylor wrote: > That'd be great to allow different transaction frameworks to plug into > Phoenix. I suspe

RE: [MARKETING] [Caution: Suspicious URL]: Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator Apache Phoenix just released version 4.7.0 with big news: transactions support, using Tephra. There's some interest in a successful Tephra incubation beyond the podling already. That said, that new code in Phoenix can be made pluggable to su