Re: [DISCUSS] Incubation Proposal of MesaTEE

2019-08-15 Thread Mingshen Sun
Thanks, Stian. Welcome! - Mingshen On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 2:16 AM Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > On Sat, 10 Aug 2019 10:12:59 -0500, Matt Sicker wrote: > > I’d most likely be interested in mentoring this project, but I’m not that > > experienced in incubator mentorship. If we have another more

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubation Proposal of MesaTEE

2019-08-14 Thread Stian Soiland-Reyes
On Sat, 10 Aug 2019 10:12:59 -0500, Matt Sicker wrote: > I’d most likely be interested in mentoring this project, but I’m not that > experienced in incubator mentorship. If we have another more experienced > mentor to work with us, I’d be happy to mentor as well. I can also join as mentor.

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubation Proposal of MesaTEE

2019-08-12 Thread Mingshen Sun
Hi Matt, thanks. We’re glad to have you as a mentor. -- Mingshen On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 8:13 AM Matt Sicker wrote: > I’d most likely be interested in mentoring this project, but I’m not that > experienced in incubator mentorship. If we have another more experienced > mentor to work with us,

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubation Proposal of MesaTEE

2019-08-10 Thread Luciano Resende
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 2:13 AM Mingshen Sun wrote: > > > > == Continuous Integration Service == > > > > > > MesaTEE currently uses self-hosted continuous integration (CI) service > > > which can > > > help developers to automatically test commits. The CI service involves > > > several > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubation Proposal of MesaTEE

2019-08-10 Thread Matt Sicker
I’d most likely be interested in mentoring this project, but I’m not that experienced in incubator mentorship. If we have another more experienced mentor to work with us, I’d be happy to mentor as well. On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 04:13, Mingshen Sun wrote: > Thanks Justin, regarding to your

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubation Proposal of MesaTEE

2019-08-10 Thread Mingshen Sun
Thanks Justin, regarding to your questions: On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 2:46 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks for the proposal, it sound like a really interesting project. > > > == Core Developers == > > > > Current core developers work at Baidu. We are confident that incubation will > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubation Proposal of MesaTEE

2019-08-08 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Thanks for the proposal, it sound like a really interesting project. > == Core Developers == > > Current core developers work at Baidu. We are confident that incubation will > help us grow a diverse community in an open and collaborative way. > > The risk of abandonment of MesaTEE is low.

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubation Proposal of MesaTEE

2019-08-07 Thread Mingshen Sun
Thanks Antoine. Feel free to discuss anything about the MesaTEE project. I’m glad to answer all questions and concerns. - Mingshen > On Aug 5, 2019, at 11:48 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > I support this proposal and would like to be listed in the interested parties. > > Cheers, > > Antoine

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubation Proposal of MesaTEE

2019-08-05 Thread Antoine Toulme
I support this proposal and would like to be listed in the interested parties. Cheers, Antoine Toulme > On Aug 5, 2019, at 8:14 PM, Zhijie Shen wrote: > > BTW, I saw MSR has an interesting research work to integrate MapReduce with > SGX to analyze big data in an privacy-preserved way: >

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubation Proposal of MesaTEE

2019-08-05 Thread Zhijie Shen
BTW, I saw MSR has an interesting research work to integrate MapReduce with SGX to analyze big data in an privacy-preserved way: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/vc3-oakland2015.pdf. I'm looking forward to the potential integration between this project with a few

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubation Proposal of MesaTEE

2019-08-04 Thread Mingshen Sun
Thanks for your interests. Regarding to you question, no, you cannot use it to sandbox arbitrary code. Trusted computing/confidential computing is not just about isolation and sandbox. For the SGX setup, because lots of sources (e.g., system calls, IO functions, etc.) are not trusted, which

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubation Proposal of MesaTEE

2019-08-04 Thread Matt Sicker
I’ve read through a bit of the site and blog posts. I’m pretty interested in the project, especially any efforts to support more programming languages. Is it possible to use this to sandbox arbitrary code? On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 17:22, Mingshen Sun wrote: > Yes, this project can be used for

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubation Proposal of MesaTEE

2019-08-03 Thread Mingshen Sun
Yes, this project can be used for securing general computations. You can simply use the `mesatee_core` library to write an SGX encalve. In addition, MesaTEE provides others features like function as a service. That’s why we call it a universal securing computing framework. Best, Mingshen Sun On

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubation Proposal of MesaTEE

2019-08-03 Thread Ted Dunning
This sounds very similar to the stuff used by Signal Foundation for securing some of their work to do with contact discovery. https://signal.org/blog/private-contact-discovery/ I would expect it to be very useful for some things. On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 8:27 AM Matt Sicker wrote: > Would

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubation Proposal of MesaTEE

2019-08-03 Thread Matt Sicker
Would this project be useful in securing general computations? You mention big data and AI a lot, though I’m wondering if this is also usable for things like, say, general multi tenant applications? On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 03:27, Mingshen Sun wrote: > Hi, > > This is Mingshen Sun from Baidu

[DISCUSS] Incubation Proposal of MesaTEE

2019-08-03 Thread Mingshen Sun
Hi, This is Mingshen Sun from Baidu X-Lab. Recently, we have open-sourced a universal secure computing framework called MesaTEE (https://mesatee.org/). The MesaTEE project enables general computing service for security-critical scenarios, which attracts many attentions from academia and