Ok its been nearly a week and there is overwhelming support for doing
this so I have gone ahead and made an update to the PPMC guide to
reflect this [policy change].
Let's remember to add this to next month's Board report.
--- Noel
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:20 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to propose that the process for Incubator poddlings to make
someone a new committer is simplified so that all that is needed are
votes from poddling committers and that there is no longer any need
for votes from
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Craig L Russell
craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote:
Assuming that no one comes forward with a significant reason to disallow
this, I'd just request that you not call a VOTE until you have an update to
the incubator page that describes the process.
In other words,
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 8:20 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to propose that the process for Incubator poddlings to make
someone a new committer is simplified so that all that is needed are
votes from poddling committers and that there is no longer any need
for votes from
+1 to the proposal.
What makes me uneasy about this is that, notwithstanding the one
mentor vote, we are basically saying that the bar for ASF
committership can now be defined solely by a group of people who might
have no knowledge, as yet, of the Apache way in general and the way
+1 @ Benson, so if that only one vote is not there, the vote is not accepted.
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 to the proposal.
What makes me uneasy about this is that, notwithstanding the one
mentor vote, we are basically saying that the bar
+1 (with the one required mentor/IPMC vote and notifying private@)
david jencks
On Nov 12, 2010, at 7:41 AM, Glen Daniels wrote:
+1 from me.
I also agree with Bertrand's point about notifying private@, and would be OK
with requiring a (single) mentor/IPMC vote to ensure that someone is
Assuming that no one comes forward with a significant reason to
disallow this, I'd just request that you not call a VOTE until you
have an update to the incubator page that describes the process.
In other words, let's DISCUSS and then VOTE on the change to the
process page.
Craig
On Nov
Hi Craig...
I think this is not a formal vote, it is like an acceptance vote
before going into the formality of a real vote, so the voting thread
is not full of a lot of *dicussion* e-mails which can drift the voting
thread away from its purpose :).
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Craig L
Hi Mohammad Nour El-Din,
On Nov 17, 2010, at 4:01 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
Hi Craig...
I think this is not a formal vote,
no disagreement
it is like an acceptance vote
no disagreement
before going into the formality of a real vote,
and before we go into a real vote we need
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 8:20 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to propose that the process for Incubator poddlings to make
someone a new committer is simplified so that all that is needed are
votes from poddling committers and that there is no longer any need
for votes from
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:20 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
As Bertrand said, I'm ok with requiring at least one mentor voting and
notice sent to private@ *afterwards*. -- justin
+1 to the combined proposal
On Nov 12, 2010, at 2:20 AM, ant elder wrote:
I'd like to propose that the process for Incubator poddlings to make
someone a new committer is simplified so that all that is needed are
votes from poddling committers and that there is no longer any need
for votes from Incubator PMC members or
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:20 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to propose that the process for Incubator poddlings to make
someone a new committer is simplified so that all that is needed are
votes from poddling committers and that there is no longer any need
for votes from
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Martin Cooper mart...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:20 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to propose that the process for Incubator poddlings to make
someone a new committer is simplified so that all that is needed are
votes from
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:20 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to propose that the process for Incubator poddlings to make
someone a new committer is simplified so that all that is needed are
votes from poddling committers and that there is no longer any need
for votes from
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:20 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to propose that the process for Incubator poddlings to make
someone a new committer is simplified so that all that is needed are
votes from
I'd like to propose that the process for Incubator poddlings to make
someone a new committer is simplified so that all that is needed are
votes from poddling committers and that there is no longer any need
for votes from Incubator PMC members or a separate Incubator PMC vote.
As justification,
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 9:20 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to propose that the process for Incubator poddlings to make
someone a new committer is simplified so that all that is needed are
votes from poddling committers and that there is no longer any need
for votes
+1 from me...
Cheers,
Chris
On 11/12/10 12:20 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to propose that the process for Incubator poddlings to make
someone a new committer is simplified so that all that is needed are
votes from poddling committers and that there is no longer any need
+1 from me.
I also agree with Bertrand's point about notifying private@, and would be OK
with requiring a (single) mentor/IPMC vote to ensure that someone is paying
attention... but it would be nice if we didn't need two.
--Glen
On 11/12/2010 3:20 AM, ant elder wrote:
I'd like to propose that
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Glen Daniels g...@thoughtcraft.com wrote:
...I also agree with Bertrand's point about notifying private@, and would be
OK
with requiring a (single) mentor/IPMC vote to ensure that someone is paying
attention... but it would be nice if we didn't need two
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:20 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to propose that the process for Incubator poddlings to make
someone a new committer is simplified so that all that is needed are
votes from poddling committers and that there is no longer any need
for votes from
23 matches
Mail list logo
