Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed resolution to graduate the PredictionIO podling

Thank you Shane! On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Donald Szeto wrote: > Awesome. Thanks for your clarification Shane! > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 4:44 PM Shane Curcuru wrote: > > > Andrew Purtell wrote on 10/3/17 5:59 PM: > > > I think we can proceed to

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed resolution to graduate the PredictionIO podling

Awesome. Thanks for your clarification Shane! On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 4:44 PM Shane Curcuru wrote: > Andrew Purtell wrote on 10/3/17 5:59 PM: > > I think we can proceed to a vote as soon as Shane confirms we are good on > > the PredictionIO trademark transfer. Should we

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed resolution to graduate the PredictionIO podling

Andrew Purtell wrote on 10/3/17 5:59 PM: > I think we can proceed to a vote as soon as Shane confirms we are good on > the PredictionIO trademark transfer. Should we ping him? The trademark assignment is signed, so you're all set to vote for graduation recommendation! Note that the ownership of

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed resolution to graduate the PredictionIO podling

Yes Andrew. That would be great. On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 3:00 PM Andrew Purtell wrote: > I think we can proceed to a vote as soon as Shane confirms we are good on > the PredictionIO trademark transfer. Should we ping him? > > > On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Donald Szeto

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed resolution to graduate the PredictionIO podling

I think we can proceed to a vote as soon as Shane confirms we are good on the PredictionIO trademark transfer. Should we ping him? On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Donald Szeto wrote: > Thanks everyone for input! Should we wait for more comments, or is this a > good time to

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed resolution to graduate the PredictionIO podling

Thanks everyone for input! Should we wait for more comments, or is this a good time to move to a recommendation vote? Regards, Donald On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz < bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Andrew Purtell >

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed resolution to graduate the PredictionIO podling

oh, nm I found it. Pasted below, there were no dissenters to Donald’s detailed assessment. On Sep 29, 2017, at 3:27 PM, Pat Ferrel wrote: Actually we did go over the maturity checklist ourselves. Donald, maybe you can forwards the thread here. pasted

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed resolution to graduate the PredictionIO podling

Actually we did go over the maturity checklist ourselves. Donald, maybe you can forwards the thread here. On Sep 29, 2017, at 2:04 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Hi John, On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 2:59 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > ...I

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed resolution to graduate the PredictionIO podling

Hi John, On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 2:59 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > ...I wouldn't conflate lack of mentor engagement with a project's readiness to > graduate, though I do agree with just hearing from them... Yes, what I was asking for is a clear statement from the mentors

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed resolution to graduate the PredictionIO podling

Hi Andrew, On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > ...I think they are ready to graduate... Thank you very much for your comments, with this I'm +1 for graduation. The resolution looks good to me. -Bertrand

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed resolution to graduate the PredictionIO podling

I am mentor and champion. I've made some comment on the incubator reports to the board about readiness, in the past few reports. PredictionIO has gotten the hang of making releases, is reliably following ASF policies and practice (I lurk on all the lists), has grown their PPMC, and on their

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed resolution to graduate the PredictionIO podling

On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 4:35 AM Bertrand Delacretaz < bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Donald Szeto wrote: > > ...Please provide your feedback on this proposed graduation resolution > by the > > PredictionIO community below... > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed resolution to graduate the PredictionIO podling

Hi, On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Donald Szeto wrote: > ...Please provide your feedback on this proposed graduation resolution by the > PredictionIO community below... Maybe I missed something but looking at the links below, that you provided before, I see very few

[DISCUSS] Proposed resolution to graduate the PredictionIO podling

Hi all, Please provide your feedback on this proposed graduation resolution by the PredictionIO community below. We are hoping to reach a consensus here before we start a recommendation vote. Thanks! Regards, Donald - X. Establish the Apache PredictionIO Project WHEREAS, the